Incremental Extractive Opinion Summarization Using Cover Trees
0
👀
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents an efficient algorithm called CoverSumm for performing extractive opinion summarization in an incremental setting, where new reviews are continuously added over time.
- Extractive opinion summarization involves automatically generating a summary of text (such as product reviews) by selecting representative sentences that capture the prevalent opinions in the data.
- Many existing state-of-the-art approaches, like CentroidRank, are centrality-based, but struggle to operate efficiently in an incremental setting where reviews arrive one at a time.
- CoverSumm addresses this challenge by leveraging a cover tree data structure to quickly compute the CentroidRank summaries as new reviews are added.
Plain English Explanation
Online marketplaces often have thousands of user reviews for various products. Summarizing these reviews in a concise and informative way can be very helpful for customers. Extractive opinion summarization is the process of automatically selecting a few key sentences from the reviews that capture the most common opinions and sentiments.
Many existing techniques for extractive opinion summarization work well when you have the full set of reviews all at once. However, in real-world scenarios, reviews are constantly being added over time. Trying to recompute the summary every time a new review comes in can be very slow and inefficient.
The researchers in this paper developed an algorithm called CoverSumm that can efficiently update the opinion summary as new reviews are added. CoverSumm uses a special data structure called a cover tree to quickly identify the most representative review sentences, without having to reprocess the entire set of reviews from scratch.
By using this incremental approach, CoverSumm is able to generate high-quality summaries much faster than previous methods - up to 36 times faster in some cases. This makes it practical to provide customers with up-to-date summaries that reflect the latest opinions, even as new reviews continuously arrive.
Technical Explanation
The core idea behind CoverSumm is to maintain a reservoir of candidate summary sentences and incrementally update this reservoir as new reviews come in. To do this efficiently, CoverSumm uses a cover tree data structure to index the representations of the review sentences.
A cover tree is a hierarchical data structure that allows for fast nearest neighbor search. This enables CoverSumm to quickly identify the review sentences that are closest to the centroid, or central point, of the entire set of reviews. These sentences are the most representative and are selected to be part of the summary.
As new reviews arrive, CoverSumm updates the cover tree and the reservoir of candidate summary sentences. It can then efficiently recompute the CentroidRank summary without having to process the entire review set from scratch.
The researchers provide a theoretical analysis showing that CoverSumm has significantly better time complexity compared to baseline methods. Empirically, they demonstrate that CoverSumm is able to generate high-quality summaries that are consistent with the underlying review data, while being up to 36 times faster than previous approaches.
Critical Analysis
The paper addresses an important practical challenge in opinion summarization - the need to efficiently update summaries as new data arrives. The CoverSumm algorithm seems like a clever and effective solution to this problem.
That said, the paper does not delve into potential limitations or areas for further research. For example, it would be interesting to understand how CoverSumm performs on very large or rapidly changing review datasets, or how it handles emerging topics and opinions that may not be well-represented in the existing summary.
Additionally, the human evaluation of the summaries is relatively limited in scope. It would be helpful to see more detailed analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the summaries produced by CoverSumm compared to other methods.
Overall, this research presents a valuable contribution to the field of extractive opinion summarization and demonstrates the potential benefits of leveraging contextual information to improve efficiency. Further exploration of the limitations and real-world deployment considerations could strengthen the work even further.
Conclusion
This paper introduces an efficient algorithm called CoverSumm for performing extractive opinion summarization in an incremental setting. By using a cover tree data structure to quickly identify the most representative review sentences, CoverSumm is able to update summaries as new reviews arrive, without having to reprocess the entire dataset.
Empirical results show that CoverSumm can generate high-quality summaries that are up to 36 times faster than previous methods. This makes it practical to provide customers with continuously updated, informative summaries of product reviews, even in dynamic, real-world scenarios.
Overall, this research demonstrates the value of developing specialized algorithms to tackle the challenges of opinion summarization in a scalable and efficient manner. The techniques introduced in this paper could have broader applications in text summarization and other areas where incrementally updating models is crucial.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
👀
0
Incremental Extractive Opinion Summarization Using Cover Trees
Somnath Basu Roy Chowdhury, Nicholas Monath, Avinava Dubey, Manzil Zaheer, Andrew McCallum, Amr Ahmed, Snigdha Chaturvedi
Extractive opinion summarization involves automatically producing a summary of text about an entity (e.g., a product's reviews) by extracting representative sentences that capture prevalent opinions in the review set. Typically, in online marketplaces user reviews accumulate over time, and opinion summaries need to be updated periodically to provide customers with up-to-date information. In this work, we study the task of extractive opinion summarization in an incremental setting, where the underlying review set evolves over time. Many of the state-of-the-art extractive opinion summarization approaches are centrality-based, such as CentroidRank (Radev et al., 2004; Chowdhury et al., 2022). CentroidRank performs extractive summarization by selecting a subset of review sentences closest to the centroid in the representation space as the summary. However, these methods are not capable of operating efficiently in an incremental setting, where reviews arrive one at a time. In this paper, we present an efficient algorithm for accurately computing the CentroidRank summaries in an incremental setting. Our approach, CoverSumm, relies on indexing review representations in a cover tree and maintaining a reservoir of candidate summary review sentences. CoverSumm's efficacy is supported by a theoretical and empirical analysis of running time. Empirically, on a diverse collection of data (both real and synthetically created to illustrate scaling considerations), we demonstrate that CoverSumm is up to 36x faster than baseline methods, and capable of adapting to nuanced changes in data distribution. We also conduct human evaluations of the generated summaries and find that CoverSumm is capable of producing informative summaries consistent with the underlying review set.
Read more4/15/2024
0
Hierarchical Indexing for Retrieval-Augmented Opinion Summarization
Tom Hosking, Hao Tang, Mirella Lapata
We propose a method for unsupervised abstractive opinion summarization, that combines the attributability and scalability of extractive approaches with the coherence and fluency of Large Language Models (LLMs). Our method, HIRO, learns an index structure that maps sentences to a path through a semantically organized discrete hierarchy. At inference time, we populate the index and use it to identify and retrieve clusters of sentences containing popular opinions from input reviews. Then, we use a pretrained LLM to generate a readable summary that is grounded in these extracted evidential clusters. The modularity of our approach allows us to evaluate its efficacy at each stage. We show that HIRO learns an encoding space that is more semantically structured than prior work, and generates summaries that are more representative of the opinions in the input reviews. Human evaluation confirms that HIRO generates significantly more coherent, detailed and accurate summaries.
Read more7/18/2024
⛏️
0
Thesis: Document Summarization with applications to Keyword extraction and Image Retrieval
Jayaprakash Sundararaj
Automatic summarization is the process of reducing a text document in order to generate a summary that retains the most important points of the original document. In this work, we study two problems - i) summarizing a text document as set of keywords/caption, for image recommedation, ii) generating opinion summary which good mix of relevancy and sentiment with the text document. Intially, we present our work on an recommending images for enhancing a substantial amount of existing plain text news articles. We use probabilistic models and word similarity heuristics to generate captions and extract Key-phrases which are re-ranked using a rank aggregation framework with relevance feedback mechanism. We show that such rank aggregation and relevant feedback which are typically used in Tagging Documents, Text Information Retrieval also helps in improving image retrieval. These queries are fed to the Yahoo Search Engine to obtain relevant images 1. Our proposed method is observed to perform better than all existing baselines. Additonally, We propose a set of submodular functions for opinion summarization. Opinion summarization has built in it the tasks of summarization and sentiment detection. However, it is not easy to detect sentiment and simultaneously extract summary. The two tasks conflict in the sense that the demand of compression may drop sentiment bearing sentences, and the demand of sentiment detection may bring in redundant sentences. However, using submodularity we show how to strike a balance between the two requirements. Our functions generate summaries such that there is good correlation between document sentiment and summary sentiment along with good ROUGE score. We also compare the performances of the proposed submodular functions.
Read more6/4/2024
0
Distilling Opinions at Scale: Incremental Opinion Summarization using XL-OPSUMM
Sri Raghava Muddu, Rupasai Rangaraju, Tejpalsingh Siledar, Swaroop Nath, Pushpak Bhattacharyya, Swaprava Nath, Suman Banerjee, Amey Patil, Muthusamy Chelliah, Sudhanshu Shekhar Singh, Nikesh Garera
Opinion summarization in e-commerce encapsulates the collective views of numerous users about a product based on their reviews. Typically, a product on an e-commerce platform has thousands of reviews, each review comprising around 10-15 words. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown proficiency in summarization tasks, they struggle to handle such a large volume of reviews due to context limitations. To mitigate, we propose a scalable framework called Xl-OpSumm that generates summaries incrementally. However, the existing test set, AMASUM has only 560 reviews per product on average. Due to the lack of a test set with thousands of reviews, we created a new test set called Xl-Flipkart by gathering data from the Flipkart website and generating summaries using GPT-4. Through various automatic evaluations and extensive analysis, we evaluated the framework's efficiency on two datasets, AMASUM and Xl-Flipkart. Experimental results show that our framework, Xl-OpSumm powered by Llama-3-8B-8k, achieves an average ROUGE-1 F1 gain of 4.38% and a ROUGE-L F1 gain of 3.70% over the next best-performing model.
Read more6/18/2024