Individual Fairness under Varied Notions of Group Fairness in Bipartite Matching - One Framework to Approximate Them All
0
🤔
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores a probabilistic approach to assigning items to platforms while satisfying both group and individual fairness constraints.
- Each item belongs to specific groups and has a preference ordering over platforms.
- Platforms enforce group fairness by limiting the number of items per group that can be assigned to them.
- The goal is to find a "best of both worlds fairness" solution that is ex-ante individually fair and ex-post group-fair.
Plain English Explanation
The paper tackles the challenge of fairly assigning items (e.g., job applicants, college admissions, etc.) to platforms (e.g., employers, universities) while considering both group-level and individual-level fairness. Each item belongs to one or more groups (e.g., gender, ethnicity) and has preferences over the available platforms.
Platforms want to enforce group fairness by limiting the number of items from each group they accept. However, this alone ignores the individual preferences of the items. The researchers' approach explores a "probabilistic individually fair" distribution over "group-fair" matchings, where each item has a high chance of being matched to one of its top choices. This distribution also maintains ex-ante group fairness.
Users can customize the fairness constraints to fit their specific requirements. The researchers provide several algorithms that can efficiently compute such fair distributions, offering a balance between group fairness and individual fairness.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a polynomial-time algorithm that computes a distribution over "group-fair" matchings, where the individual fairness constraints are approximately satisfied, and the expected size of the matching is close to the optimal (OPT) solution. The researchers also introduce two additional polynomial-time bi-criteria approximation algorithms that allow users to balance the trade-offs between group fairness and individual fairness.
For the case of disjoint groups, the researchers provide an exact polynomial-time algorithm that can be adapted to handle additional lower "group fairness" bounds. They also extend their model to encompass "maxmin group fairness" (amplifying underrepresented groups) and "mindom group fairness" (reducing the representation of dominant groups).
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a comprehensive approach to addressing the challenge of achieving both group and individual fairness in item-to-platform assignments. The researchers have provided several practical algorithms that can be customized to suit various fairness requirements.
One potential limitation of the research is the assumption that items have complete preference orderings over platforms. In real-world scenarios, this may not always be the case, and the researchers may need to explore alternative approaches to handle incomplete preferences.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential societal implications of the proposed fairness models. Further research could investigate how these fairness definitions and algorithms might impact different stakeholders and whether they lead to unintended consequences.
Conclusion
This paper offers a novel and practical solution to the challenging problem of achieving both group and individual fairness in item-to-platform assignments. By providing a range of customizable algorithms, the researchers have made significant progress in bridging the gap between these two important fairness considerations.
The findings of this work could have wide-ranging applications in areas such as job hiring, college admissions, and online marketplaces, where balancing group and individual fairness is crucial for procedural fairness and inclusive decision-making.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤔
0
Individual Fairness under Varied Notions of Group Fairness in Bipartite Matching - One Framework to Approximate Them All
Atasi Panda, Anand Louis, Prajakta Nimbhorkar
We study the probabilistic assignment of items to platforms that satisfies both group and individual fairness constraints. Each item belongs to specific groups and has a preference ordering over platforms. Each platform enforces group fairness by limiting the number of items per group that can be assigned to it. There could be multiple optimal solutions that satisfy the group fairness constraints, but this alone ignores item preferences. Our approach explores a `best of both worlds fairness' solution to get a randomized matching, which is ex-ante individually fair and ex-post group-fair. Thus, we seek a `probabilistic individually fair' distribution over `group-fair' matchings where each item has a `high' probability of matching to one of its top choices. This distribution is also ex-ante group-fair. Users can customize fairness constraints to suit their requirements. Our first result is a polynomial-time algorithm that computes a distribution over `group-fair' matchings such that the individual fairness constraints are approximately satisfied and the expected size of a matching is close to OPT. We empirically test this on real-world datasets. We present two additional polynomial-time bi-criteria approximation algorithms that users can choose from to balance group fairness and individual fairness trade-offs. For disjoint groups, we provide an exact polynomial-time algorithm adaptable to additional lower `group fairness' bounds. Extending our model, we encompass `maxmin group fairness,' amplifying underrepresented groups, and `mindom group fairness,' reducing the representation of dominant groups.'
Read more5/13/2024
0
A Unified View of Group Fairness Tradeoffs Using Partial Information Decomposition
Faisal Hamman, Sanghamitra Dutta
This paper introduces a novel information-theoretic perspective on the relationship between prominent group fairness notions in machine learning, namely statistical parity, equalized odds, and predictive parity. It is well known that simultaneous satisfiability of these three fairness notions is usually impossible, motivating practitioners to resort to approximate fairness solutions rather than stringent satisfiability of these definitions. However, a comprehensive analysis of their interrelations, particularly when they are not exactly satisfied, remains largely unexplored. Our main contribution lies in elucidating an exact relationship between these three measures of (un)fairness by leveraging a body of work in information theory called partial information decomposition (PID). In this work, we leverage PID to identify the granular regions where these three measures of (un)fairness overlap and where they disagree with each other leading to potential tradeoffs. We also include numerical simulations to complement our results.
Read more6/10/2024
🧠
0
Bridging the Fairness Divide: Achieving Group and Individual Fairness in Graph Neural Networks
Duna Zhan, Dongliang Guo, Pengsheng Ji, Sheng Li
Graph neural networks (GNNs) have emerged as a powerful tool for analyzing and learning from complex data structured as graphs, demonstrating remarkable effectiveness in various applications, such as social network analysis, recommendation systems, and drug discovery. However, despite their impressive performance, the fairness problem has increasingly gained attention as a crucial aspect to consider. Existing research in graph learning focuses on either group fairness or individual fairness. However, since each concept provides unique insights into fairness from distinct perspectives, integrating them into a fair graph neural network system is crucial. To the best of our knowledge, no study has yet to comprehensively tackle both individual and group fairness simultaneously. In this paper, we propose a new concept of individual fairness within groups and a novel framework named Fairness for Group and Individual (FairGI), which considers both group fairness and individual fairness within groups in the context of graph learning. FairGI employs the similarity matrix of individuals to achieve individual fairness within groups, while leveraging adversarial learning to address group fairness in terms of both Equal Opportunity and Statistical Parity. The experimental results demonstrate that our approach not only outperforms other state-of-the-art models in terms of group fairness and individual fairness within groups, but also exhibits excellent performance in population-level individual fairness, while maintaining comparable prediction accuracy.
Read more4/29/2024
📊
0
A Canonical Data Transformation for Achieving Inter- and Within-group Fairness
Zachary McBride Lazri, Ivan Brugere, Xin Tian, Dana Dachman-Soled, Antigoni Polychroniadou, Danial Dervovic, Min Wu
Increases in the deployment of machine learning algorithms for applications that deal with sensitive data have brought attention to the issue of fairness in machine learning. Many works have been devoted to applications that require different demographic groups to be treated fairly. However, algorithms that aim to satisfy inter-group fairness (also called group fairness) may inadvertently treat individuals within the same demographic group unfairly. To address this issue, we introduce a formal definition of within-group fairness that maintains fairness among individuals from within the same group. We propose a pre-processing framework to meet both inter- and within-group fairness criteria with little compromise in accuracy. The framework maps the feature vectors of members from different groups to an inter-group-fair canonical domain before feeding them into a scoring function. The mapping is constructed to preserve the relative relationship between the scores obtained from the unprocessed feature vectors of individuals from the same demographic group, guaranteeing within-group fairness. We apply this framework to the COMPAS risk assessment and Law School datasets and compare its performance in achieving inter-group and within-group fairness to two regularization-based methods.
Read more7/9/2024