Infrared Adversarial Car Stickers

Read original: arXiv:2405.09924 - Published 5/17/2024 by Xiaopei Zhu, Yuqiu Liu, Zhanhao Hu, Jianmin Li, Xiaolin Hu
Total Score

0

Infrared Adversarial Car Stickers

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces a novel method for creating adversarial car stickers that can fool infrared-based object detection systems used in autonomous vehicles.
  • The authors demonstrate that by carefully designing these stickers, they can cause target vehicles to become invisible or misclassified to the vehicle's sensors.
  • This research highlights the potential vulnerabilities of current autonomous driving systems to physical world attacks.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a technique for creating special stickers that can trick the sensors in self-driving cars. These stickers are designed to confuse the car's infrared cameras and object detection algorithms, causing it to either not see the car with the sticker or misidentify it.

The key idea is that by carefully engineering the patterns and colors on the stickers, the researchers were able to generate "adversarial" inputs that fool the AI systems in autonomous vehicles. This means a car with these special stickers could potentially avoid being detected by self-driving cars, potentially creating dangerous situations on the road.

The research demonstrates how current autonomous driving technology can be vulnerable to physical-world attacks. Even if the self-driving car's algorithms work well in normal conditions, specially crafted objects like these stickers can disrupt their functioning in the real world. This highlights an important security challenge that needs to be addressed as self-driving cars become more common.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a novel method for generating infrared adversarial car stickers that can fool object detection systems used in autonomous vehicles. The authors leverage recent advances in adversarial attacks to design sticker patterns that are invisible to the car's infrared cameras but still noticeable to human eyes.

Through a series of experiments, the researchers demonstrate that these adversarial stickers can cause target vehicles to either become completely undetected or be misclassified by the autonomous vehicle's perception systems. They also show that these attacks can be dynamic and context-aware, adapting to different lighting conditions and camera angles.

The authors argue that this work highlights the potential vulnerabilities of current autonomous driving systems to physical world attacks. Even if the underlying object detection algorithms perform well in controlled test environments, the introduction of carefully crafted adversarial inputs can disrupt their performance in the real world.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a compelling demonstration of how adversarial attacks can be applied to the physical world in the context of autonomous driving. The authors' approach of using infrared-based adversarial stickers is novel and highlights an interesting attack surface that may not have been widely considered before.

However, the paper does not fully explore the practical limitations and challenges of deploying such attacks in the real world. For example, the stickers would need to be precisely manufactured and applied to target vehicles, which may not be feasible in many scenarios. Additionally, the authors do not address potential countermeasures that autonomous vehicle manufacturers could implement to detect and mitigate such attacks.

Further research is needed to understand the broader implications and scalability of this type of attack. The paper also does not discuss the ethical considerations and potential misuse of this technology, which is an important aspect that should be carefully examined.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel technique for creating adversarial car stickers that can fool the infrared-based object detection systems used in autonomous vehicles. The authors demonstrate that by carefully designing the patterns and colors of these stickers, they can cause target vehicles to become invisible or misclassified to the self-driving car's sensors.

The research highlights the potential vulnerabilities of current autonomous driving technology to physical-world attacks, which is an important security challenge that needs to be addressed as these systems become more widespread. While the paper provides a compelling proof-of-concept, further work is needed to fully understand the practical limitations and broader implications of this type of attack.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Infrared Adversarial Car Stickers
Total Score

0

Infrared Adversarial Car Stickers

Xiaopei Zhu, Yuqiu Liu, Zhanhao Hu, Jianmin Li, Xiaolin Hu

Infrared physical adversarial examples are of great significance for studying the security of infrared AI systems that are widely used in our lives such as autonomous driving. Previous infrared physical attacks mainly focused on 2D infrared pedestrian detection which may not fully manifest its destructiveness to AI systems. In this work, we propose a physical attack method against infrared detectors based on 3D modeling, which is applied to a real car. The goal is to design a set of infrared adversarial stickers to make cars invisible to infrared detectors at various viewing angles, distances, and scenes. We build a 3D infrared car model with real infrared characteristics and propose an infrared adversarial pattern generation method based on 3D mesh shadow. We propose a 3D control points-based mesh smoothing algorithm and use a set of smoothness loss functions to enhance the smoothness of adversarial meshes and facilitate the sticker implementation. Besides, We designed the aluminum stickers and conducted physical experiments on two real Mercedes-Benz A200L cars. Our adversarial stickers hid the cars from Faster RCNN, an object detector, at various viewing angles, distances, and scenes. The attack success rate (ASR) was 91.49% for real cars. In comparison, the ASRs of random stickers and no sticker were only 6.21% and 0.66%, respectively. In addition, the ASRs of the designed stickers against six unseen object detectors such as YOLOv3 and Deformable DETR were between 73.35%-95.80%, showing good transferability of the attack performance across detectors.

Read more

5/17/2024

🎯

Total Score

0

Multi-View Black-Box Physical Attacks on Infrared Pedestrian Detectors Using Adversarial Infrared Grid

Kalibinuer Tiliwalidi, Chengyin Hu, Weiwen Shi

While extensive research exists on physical adversarial attacks within the visible spectrum, studies on such techniques in the infrared spectrum are limited. Infrared object detectors are vital in modern technological applications but are susceptible to adversarial attacks, posing significant security threats. Previous studies using physical perturbations like light bulb arrays and aerogels for white-box attacks, or hot and cold patches for black-box attacks, have proven impractical or limited in multi-view support. To address these issues, we propose the Adversarial Infrared Grid (AdvGrid), which models perturbations in a grid format and uses a genetic algorithm for black-box optimization. These perturbations are cyclically applied to various parts of a pedestrian's clothing to facilitate multi-view black-box physical attacks on infrared pedestrian detectors. Extensive experiments validate AdvGrid's effectiveness, stealthiness, and robustness. The method achieves attack success rates of 80.00% in digital environments and 91.86% in physical environments, outperforming baseline methods. Additionally, the average attack success rate exceeds 50% against mainstream detectors, demonstrating AdvGrid's robustness. Our analyses include ablation studies, transfer attacks, and adversarial defenses, confirming the method's superiority.

Read more

7/9/2024

Invisible Optical Adversarial Stripes on Traffic Sign against Autonomous Vehicles
Total Score

0

Invisible Optical Adversarial Stripes on Traffic Sign against Autonomous Vehicles

Dongfang Guo, Yuting Wu, Yimin Dai, Pengfei Zhou, Xin Lou, Rui Tan

Camera-based computer vision is essential to autonomous vehicle's perception. This paper presents an attack that uses light-emitting diodes and exploits the camera's rolling shutter effect to create adversarial stripes in the captured images to mislead traffic sign recognition. The attack is stealthy because the stripes on the traffic sign are invisible to human. For the attack to be threatening, the recognition results need to be stable over consecutive image frames. To achieve this, we design and implement GhostStripe, an attack system that controls the timing of the modulated light emission to adapt to camera operations and victim vehicle movements. Evaluated on real testbeds, GhostStripe can stably spoof the traffic sign recognition results for up to 94% of frames to a wrong class when the victim vehicle passes the road section. In reality, such attack effect may fool victim vehicles into life-threatening incidents. We discuss the countermeasures at the levels of camera sensor, perception model, and autonomous driving system.

Read more

7/11/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

Defending Against Physical Adversarial Patch Attacks on Infrared Human Detection

Lukas Strack, Futa Waseda, Huy H. Nguyen, Yinqiang Zheng, Isao Echizen

Infrared detection is an emerging technique for safety-critical tasks owing to its remarkable anti-interference capability. However, recent studies have revealed that it is vulnerable to physically-realizable adversarial patches, posing risks in its real-world applications. To address this problem, we are the first to investigate defense strategies against adversarial patch attacks on infrared detection, especially human detection. We propose a straightforward defense strategy, patch-based occlusion-aware detection (POD), which efficiently augments training samples with random patches and subsequently detects them. POD not only robustly detects people but also identifies adversarial patch locations. Surprisingly, while being extremely computationally efficient, POD easily generalizes to state-of-the-art adversarial patch attacks that are unseen during training. Furthermore, POD improves detection precision even in a clean (i.e., no-attack) situation due to the data augmentation effect. Our evaluation demonstrates that POD is robust to adversarial patches of various shapes and sizes. The effectiveness of our baseline approach is shown to be a viable defense mechanism for real-world infrared human detection systems, paving the way for exploring future research directions.

Read more

6/11/2024