Initialization is Critical to Whether Transformers Fit Composite Functions by Inference or Memorizing

Overview

• This paper investigates how the initial parameters ("initialization") of Transformer models can impact whether they fit a given composite function by inference or by memorization.
• The authors conduct experiments to understand how initialization affects the Transformer's ability to generalize and compose functions.
• They find that the Transformer's behavior critically depends on its initialization, with some initializations leading to inference-based generalization and others leading to memorization.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at how the starting point, or "initialization", of a Transformer machine learning model can affect whether the model tries to

the underlying function from the data, or simply the examples it has seen. Transformers are a type of neural network that have become very popular for tasks like language processing and generation.

The key idea is that the initialization of the model's parameters (the starting numbers used before training) can lead the model down different paths - one where it tries to figure out the general rules and patterns in the data, versus one where it just remembers the specific examples it has seen. This has important implications for how well the model can generalize to new situations it hasn't seen before.

The researchers ran experiments to explore this phenomenon in more depth. They found that Transformers' behavior can indeed critically depend on their initialization - some initializations lead to inference-based generalization, while others lead to mere memorization. This helps explain why Transformers can sometimes struggle to compose or generalize functions, and shows the importance of carefully choosing the initialization when training these models.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates how the initialization of Transformer models affects their ability to fit a given composite function, either through

(discovering the underlying rules) or (remembering specific examples).

The authors design experiments where Transformers are trained to fit a composite function f(g(x)), where f and g are simple functions. They explore how the Transformer's behavior changes based on the initialization of its parameters.

The key finding is that the Transformer's approach - either inference or memorization - is highly sensitive to the initialization. Some initializations lead the Transformer to discover the underlying f and g functions and generalize to new compositions. Other initializations cause the Transformer to simply memorize the training examples, failing to generalize.

This suggests that the inductive biases encoded in the Transformer's initialization play a critical role in whether it can learn to compose functions. Initializations that preserve the modular structure of the problem seem to facilitate inference-based generalization, while other initializations lead to memorization.

The paper provides important insights into the factors that impact the Transformer's ability to learn and compose functions, with implications for designing more compositional and generalizable language models.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a detailed and thoughtful investigation into an important issue with Transformer models - their tendency to memorize rather than truly understand and generalize composite functions. The authors' experimental setup and analysis are rigorous, and their findings have clear relevance for the development of more compositional and generalizable language models.

That said, the paper does not delve into some potential limitations or caveats. For example, it's unclear how these results would scale to more complex, realistic composite functions beyond the simple examples used in the experiments. Additionally, the authors don't explore the precise mechanisms by which different initializations lead to memorization versus inference-based generalization.

Further research could investigate these issues in more depth, as well as explore techniques for encouraging Transformers to adopt more inference-based approaches by design, perhaps through specialized architectures or training regimes. Exploring methods like iterated learning or activating hidden spatial invariance may help address the memorization tendencies highlighted in this paper.

Conclusion

This paper makes an important contribution by demonstrating the critical role that initialization plays in whether Transformer models fit a composite function through inference or memorization. The authors' experimental findings reveal fundamental limitations in the Transformer's ability to compose functions, with significant implications for the development of more compositional and generalizable language models.

While the paper does not explore all possible angles, it provides a solid foundation for future research into techniques that can encourage Transformers to adopt more inference-based approaches. Addressing the memorization tendencies highlighted in this work could unlock substantial advances in the field of compositional machine learning.