Local to Global: Learning Dynamics and Effect of Initialization for Transformers

Read original: arXiv:2406.03072 - Published 6/28/2024 by Ashok Vardhan Makkuva, Marco Bondaschi, Chanakya Ekbote, Adway Girish, Alliot Nagle, Hyeji Kim, Michael Gastpar
Total Score

0

🏷️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Transformers have revolutionized deep learning, particularly in sequence modeling.
  • Researchers are using Markov input processes to study transformers, but our understanding in this area is limited.
  • This paper focuses on first-order Markov chains and single-layer transformers, providing a comprehensive characterization of the learning dynamics in this context.

Plain English Explanation

Transformer-based models have become incredibly powerful and widely used in deep learning, especially for tasks involving sequences of data, like language processing. Researchers are increasingly interested in using Markov processes, which are mathematical models of sequences, to better understand how transformers learn and work. However, there are still many unanswered questions about this relationship.

This paper takes a close look at a specific type of Markov process, called a first-order Markov chain, and how it interacts with a simple transformer model with a single layer. The researchers provide a detailed analysis of how the transformer's parameters (the values that determine its behavior) can either converge to a global minimum, which is the best possible solution, or get stuck in a local minimum, which is a pretty good but not perfect solution. Crucially, they show that whether the transformer reaches a global or local minimum depends on how the parameters are initialized, or set up at the beginning.

To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first time research has highlighted the important role that initialization plays in how transformers learn from Markov chain data. The paper also provides evidence from experiments that supports these theoretical findings. Based on these insights, the researchers offer guidelines for how to initialize transformer parameters to get the best results.

Technical Explanation

The paper focuses on studying the learning dynamics of single-layer transformer models trained on next-token prediction tasks using first-order Markov chain data. The authors prove that the transformer parameters can converge to either global or local minima of the loss function, depending on the initialization and properties of the Markov chain.

Specifically, they show that if the initial transformer parameters are "close enough" to the global minimum, the model will converge to that global minimum. However, if the initialization is not close enough, the model may get stuck in a local minimum instead. The authors precisely characterize the conditions under which global or local convergence will occur.

This is the first result of its kind to highlight the crucial role of parameter initialization in how transformers learn from Markov chain data. The authors corroborate their theoretical findings through empirical experiments and provide guidelines for initializing transformer parameters to achieve global convergence.

The paper also outlines several open problems in this area, such as extending the analysis to deeper transformer architectures and more complex Markov processes. Understanding how transformers learn from sequential data is an important step towards developing better theory for tokenization in large language models and characterizing the nonlinear feature learning capabilities of transformers.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable theoretical insights into how transformer parameters converge when trained on Markov chain data. The authors' characterization of the conditions for global versus local convergence is an important contribution, as it highlights the sensitivity of transformer learning to initialization.

However, the analysis is limited to single-layer transformers and first-order Markov chains. Extending these results to deeper transformer architectures and more complex Markov processes remains an open challenge, as mentioned by the authors. It would be helpful to see further research exploring the dynamics of multi-head transformer models and how transformers learn and generalize in nonconvex settings.

Additionally, the paper does not address the practical implications of these findings for real-world applications of transformer models. It would be useful to see discussions on how the initialization guidelines could be applied to improve the performance of transformers in tasks like language modeling or text generation.

Overall, this paper provides a solid theoretical foundation for understanding the learning dynamics of transformers in the context of Markov chain data. The insights presented here can inform future research and the development of more robust and reliable transformer-based models.

Conclusion

This paper offers a comprehensive characterization of how single-layer transformer models learn from first-order Markov chain data. The key finding is that the transformer parameters can converge to either global or local minima of the loss function, depending on the initialization and properties of the Markov chain.

This is an important contribution, as it highlights the crucial role of parameter initialization in transformer learning, an aspect that has not been well-studied before. The authors provide guidelines for initializing transformer parameters to achieve global convergence, which can be valuable for practitioners.

The paper also outlines several open problems, suggesting directions for future research in this area. Extending the analysis to deeper transformer architectures and more complex Markov processes, as well as exploring the practical implications for real-world applications, are promising avenues for further investigation.

Overall, this work advances our understanding of how transformers learn from sequential data and lays the groundwork for developing more robust and reliable transformer-based models.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🏷️

Total Score

0

Local to Global: Learning Dynamics and Effect of Initialization for Transformers

Ashok Vardhan Makkuva, Marco Bondaschi, Chanakya Ekbote, Adway Girish, Alliot Nagle, Hyeji Kim, Michael Gastpar

In recent years, transformer-based models have revolutionized deep learning, particularly in sequence modeling. To better understand this phenomenon, there is a growing interest in using Markov input processes to study transformers. However, our current understanding in this regard remains limited with many fundamental questions about how transformers learn Markov chains still unanswered. In this paper, we address this by focusing on first-order Markov chains and single-layer transformers, providing a comprehensive characterization of the learning dynamics in this context. Specifically, we prove that transformer parameters trained on next-token prediction loss can either converge to global or local minima, contingent on the initialization and the Markovian data properties, and we characterize the precise conditions under which this occurs. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first result of its kind highlighting the role of initialization. We further demonstrate that our theoretical findings are corroborated by empirical evidence. Based on these insights, we provide guidelines for the initialization of transformer parameters and demonstrate their effectiveness. Finally, we outline several open problems in this arena. Code is available at: https://github.com/Bond1995/Markov.

Read more

6/28/2024

Transformers on Markov Data: Constant Depth Suffices
Total Score

0

Transformers on Markov Data: Constant Depth Suffices

Nived Rajaraman, Marco Bondaschi, Kannan Ramchandran, Michael Gastpar, Ashok Vardhan Makkuva

Attention-based transformers have been remarkably successful at modeling generative processes across various domains and modalities. In this paper, we study the behavior of transformers on data drawn from kth Markov processes, where the conditional distribution of the next symbol in a sequence depends on the previous $k$ symbols observed. We observe a surprising phenomenon empirically which contradicts previous findings: when trained for sufficiently long, a transformer with a fixed depth and $1$ head per layer is able to achieve low test loss on sequences drawn from kth Markov sources, even as $k$ grows. Furthermore, this low test loss is achieved by the transformer's ability to represent and learn the in-context conditional empirical distribution. On the theoretical side, our main result is that a transformer with a single head and three layers can represent the in-context conditional empirical distribution for kth Markov sources, concurring with our empirical observations. Along the way, we prove that textit{attention-only} transformers with $O(log_2(k))$ layers can represent the in-context conditional empirical distribution by composing induction heads to track the previous $k$ symbols in the sequence. These results provide more insight into our current understanding of the mechanisms by which transformers learn to capture context, by understanding their behavior on Markov sources.

Read more

7/26/2024

👀

Total Score

0

How do Transformers perform In-Context Autoregressive Learning?

Michael E. Sander, Raja Giryes, Taiji Suzuki, Mathieu Blondel, Gabriel Peyr'e

Transformers have achieved state-of-the-art performance in language modeling tasks. However, the reasons behind their tremendous success are still unclear. In this paper, towards a better understanding, we train a Transformer model on a simple next token prediction task, where sequences are generated as a first-order autoregressive process $s_{t+1} = W s_t$. We show how a trained Transformer predicts the next token by first learning $W$ in-context, then applying a prediction mapping. We call the resulting procedure in-context autoregressive learning. More precisely, focusing on commuting orthogonal matrices $W$, we first show that a trained one-layer linear Transformer implements one step of gradient descent for the minimization of an inner objective function, when considering augmented tokens. When the tokens are not augmented, we characterize the global minima of a one-layer diagonal linear multi-head Transformer. Importantly, we exhibit orthogonality between heads and show that positional encoding captures trigonometric relations in the data. On the experimental side, we consider the general case of non-commuting orthogonal matrices and generalize our theoretical findings.

Read more

6/6/2024

🏋️

Total Score

0

Unveiling Induction Heads: Provable Training Dynamics and Feature Learning in Transformers

Siyu Chen, Heejune Sheen, Tianhao Wang, Zhuoran Yang

In-context learning (ICL) is a cornerstone of large language model (LLM) functionality, yet its theoretical foundations remain elusive due to the complexity of transformer architectures. In particular, most existing work only theoretically explains how the attention mechanism facilitates ICL under certain data models. It remains unclear how the other building blocks of the transformer contribute to ICL. To address this question, we study how a two-attention-layer transformer is trained to perform ICL on $n$-gram Markov chain data, where each token in the Markov chain statistically depends on the previous $n$ tokens. We analyze a sophisticated transformer model featuring relative positional embedding, multi-head softmax attention, and a feed-forward layer with normalization. We prove that the gradient flow with respect to a cross-entropy ICL loss converges to a limiting model that performs a generalized version of the induction head mechanism with a learned feature, resulting from the congruous contribution of all the building blocks. In the limiting model, the first attention layer acts as a $mathit{copier}$, copying past tokens within a given window to each position, and the feed-forward network with normalization acts as a $mathit{selector}$ that generates a feature vector by only looking at informationally relevant parents from the window. Finally, the second attention layer is a $mathit{classifier}$ that compares these features with the feature at the output position, and uses the resulting similarity scores to generate the desired output. Our theory is further validated by experiments.

Read more

9/18/2024