Innovation Resistance Theory in Action: Unveiling Barriers to Open Government Data Adoption by Public Organizations to Unlock Open Data Innovation

Overview

• This study explores the factors that prevent public organizations from openly sharing government data (OGD).
• It develops an Innovation Resistance Theory (IRT) model tailored to the OGD context to identify the predictors of resistance among public agencies.
• The researchers conducted interviews with 21 public agencies across six countries to refine the initial model.
• The final model describes 39 barriers related to usage, value, risks, tradition, and image that public agencies face in adopting OGD.

Plain English Explanation

Governments around the world are collecting and storing vast amounts of data that could be valuable for businesses, researchers, and the public. Making this Open Government Data (OGD) openly available has the potential to drive data-driven innovation and sustainability across many sectors. However, many public organizations are hesitant to share their data publicly.

This study aimed to understand the reasons why public agencies are resistant to adopting OGD. The researchers developed a model based on Innovation Resistance Theory (IRT), which is typically used to study people's resistance to adopting new technologies or ideas. They refined this model through interviews with 21 public agencies in six countries.

The final IRT model for OGD identified 39 different barriers that public agencies face. These barriers fall into five main categories:

1. Usage: Concerns about how the data will be used or misused
2. Value: Uncertainty about the benefits or value of sharing the data
3. Risks: Worries about potential risks, such as privacy or security issues
4. Tradition: Resistance to changing established practices and traditions
5. Image: Concerns about how sharing the data may affect the organization's public image

By understanding these barriers, policymakers can work to address the challenges and create data ecosystems that encourage public agencies to be more open with their data.

Technical Explanation

The researchers developed an Innovation Resistance Theory (IRT) model tailored to the context of Open Government Data (OGD) to identify the predictors of resistance among public agencies. They started with an initial model based on a review of relevant literature and then refined it through semi-structured interviews with 21 public agencies across six countries (Australia, Canada, Germany, India, the Netherlands, and the United States).

The final IRT model for OGD describes 39 barriers that public agencies face, categorized into five main factors:

1. Usage: Concerns about how the data will be used or misused, such as fears of the data being used for political purposes or to criticize the agency.
2. Value: Uncertainty about the benefits or value of sharing the data, including a lack of understanding of how the data could be used or a perception that the data is not valuable enough to share.
3. Risks: Worries about potential risks, such as privacy or security issues, data quality problems, or legal and regulatory challenges.
4. Tradition: Resistance to changing established practices and traditions, including a preference for maintaining control over the data and a lack of experience with open data initiatives.
5. Image: Concerns about how sharing the data may affect the organization's public image, such as fears of being criticized or losing credibility.

The findings contribute to the literature by adapting IRT to the specific context of OGD, an area where its application has been limited. The study also provides practical insights for policymakers to help create data ecosystems that encourage data openness and address the challenges in OGD adoption.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several limitations of the study. First, the sample size of 21 public agencies, while providing valuable insights, may not be representative of all public organizations. Additionally, the study focused on agencies in six countries, so the barriers identified may not apply equally to all contexts.

Furthermore, the study relied on self-reported data from the public agencies, which may not fully capture the complex and multifaceted nature of the barriers to OGD adoption. There may be additional factors or nuances that were not uncovered through the interview process.

While the IRT model provides a useful framework for understanding resistance to OGD, the researchers note that it may not capture all the potential drivers of resistance. Other theoretical models, such as those focused on organizational change or user acceptance of technology, could potentially offer additional insights.

Future research could explore the relative importance of the different barriers identified, as well as how they may vary across different types of public agencies or cultural contexts. Longitudinal studies could also shed light on how barriers to OGD adoption may evolve over time as the technology and data ecosystems mature.

Conclusion

This study provides a valuable contribution to the understanding of the factors that prevent public organizations from openly sharing government data (OGD). By developing an Innovation Resistance Theory (IRT) model tailored to the OGD context, the researchers have identified a comprehensive set of 39 barriers that public agencies face in adopting OGD.

The findings from this research can help policymakers and stakeholders in the public data ecosystems to better understand the challenges and develop strategies to address them. By creating data-sharing environments that mitigate the identified barriers, governments can unlock the potential of OGD to drive data-driven innovation and sustainability across various sectors.