Instance-dependent Noisy-label Learning with Graphical Model Based Noise-rate Estimation
0
📈
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Deep learning models often struggle with noisy or unreliable training data, leading to overfitting and poor performance.
- A common issue is instance-dependent noise (IDN), where the noise level varies across different samples in the training data.
- Existing label noise learning (LNL) approaches use a predefined curriculum to gradually select less noisy samples during training, but this is suboptimal as it doesn't account for the actual noise rate.
Plain English Explanation
Deep learning models are powerful, but they can have a hard time dealing with messy or unreliable training data. One big challenge is something called "instance-dependent noise" (IDN), where the amount of noise or error in the training labels varies across different samples.
Existing methods for handling this try to gradually focus the model on the "cleaner" samples over time, using a predefined plan or "curriculum". However, this approach isn't ideal because it doesn't actually know the true noise rate in the data.
Technical Explanation
This paper addresses the issue of instance-dependent label noise (IDN) in deep learning. IDN refers to a realistic scenario where the level of noise in the training labels varies across different samples. To handle IDN, Label Noise Learning (LNL) approaches incorporate a sample selection stage to differentiate clean and noisy-label samples. However, existing LNL methods use a predefined curriculum that initially selects most samples as noisy and gradually decreases this selection rate during training. This curriculum is suboptimal as it does not consider the actual label noise rate in the training set.
The key contribution of this paper is a new noise-rate estimation method that can be easily integrated with state-of-the-art (SOTA) LNL methods, such as Trusted Multi-View Learning and Noisy Label Processing for Classification. By incorporating this noise-rate estimation, the authors are able to produce a more effective curriculum for sample selection during training. Experiments on synthetic and real-world benchmarks demonstrate that integrating their approach with SOTA LNL methods can improve accuracy in most cases compared to using the predefined curriculum alone.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a practical solution to a challenging problem in deep learning – handling noisy or unreliable training labels, especially in the case of instance-dependent noise. The proposed noise-rate estimation method is a clever way to address the limitations of existing LNL approaches, which rely on predefined, suboptimal curricula.
However, the paper does not extensively explore the limitations of their approach. For example, it's unclear how the noise-rate estimation would perform in scenarios with extremely high noise levels or with very complex, heterogeneous noise patterns. Additionally, the paper could have benefited from a deeper analysis of the computational and memory overhead introduced by the noise-rate estimation, as this could be an important practical consideration.
Further research could also investigate ways to make the noise-rate estimation more robust or adaptive, perhaps by incorporating ideas from noisy node classification or data stream sampling with fuzzy task boundaries. Overall, this paper presents a valuable contribution to the field of learning with noisy labels, but there is still room for further improvements and extensions.
Conclusion
This paper tackles the challenge of instance-dependent label noise in deep learning, a realistic scenario where the amount of noise in the training data varies across different samples. By proposing a new noise-rate estimation method that can be integrated with state-of-the-art label noise learning approaches, the authors are able to produce a more effective curriculum for sample selection during training. The results demonstrate improved accuracy on both synthetic and real-world benchmarks, highlighting the practical significance of this work for building robust deep learning models in the presence of noisy data.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📈
0
Instance-dependent Noisy-label Learning with Graphical Model Based Noise-rate Estimation
Arpit Garg, Cuong Nguyen, Rafael Felix, Thanh-Toan Do, Gustavo Carneiro
Deep learning faces a formidable challenge when handling noisy labels, as models tend to overfit samples affected by label noise. This challenge is further compounded by the presence of instance-dependent noise (IDN), a realistic form of label noise arising from ambiguous sample information. To address IDN, Label Noise Learning (LNL) incorporates a sample selection stage to differentiate clean and noisy-label samples. This stage uses an arbitrary criterion and a pre-defined curriculum that initially selects most samples as noisy and gradually decreases this selection rate during training. Such curriculum is sub-optimal since it does not consider the actual label noise rate in the training set. This paper addresses this issue with a new noise-rate estimation method that is easily integrated with most state-of-the-art (SOTA) LNL methods to produce a more effective curriculum. Synthetic and real-world benchmark results demonstrate that integrating our approach with SOTA LNL methods improves accuracy in most cases.
Read more7/8/2024
0
Learning with Instance-Dependent Noisy Labels by Anchor Hallucination and Hard Sample Label Correction
Po-Hsuan Huang, Chia-Ching Lin, Chih-Fan Hsu, Ming-Ching Chang, Wei-Chao Chen
Learning from noisy-labeled data is crucial for real-world applications. Traditional Noisy-Label Learning (NLL) methods categorize training data into clean and noisy sets based on the loss distribution of training samples. However, they often neglect that clean samples, especially those with intricate visual patterns, may also yield substantial losses. This oversight is particularly significant in datasets with Instance-Dependent Noise (IDN), where mislabeling probabilities correlate with visual appearance. Our approach explicitly distinguishes between clean vs.noisy and easy vs. hard samples. We identify training samples with small losses, assuming they have simple patterns and correct labels. Utilizing these easy samples, we hallucinate multiple anchors to select hard samples for label correction. Corrected hard samples, along with the easy samples, are used as labeled data in subsequent semi-supervised training. Experiments on synthetic and real-world IDN datasets demonstrate the superior performance of our method over other state-of-the-art NLL methods.
Read more7/11/2024
0
LNL+K: Enhancing Learning with Noisy Labels Through Noise Source Knowledge Integration
Siqi Wang, Bryan A. Plummer
Learning with noisy labels (LNL) aims to train a high-performing model using a noisy dataset. We observe that noise for a given class often comes from a limited set of categories, yet many LNL methods overlook this. For example, an image mislabeled as a cheetah is more likely a leopard than a hippopotamus due to its visual similarity. Thus, we explore Learning with Noisy Labels with noise source Knowledge integration (LNL+K), which leverages knowledge about likely source(s) of label noise that is often provided in a dataset's meta-data. Integrating noise source knowledge boosts performance even in settings where LNL methods typically fail. For example, LNL+K methods are effective on datasets where noise represents the majority of samples, which breaks a critical premise of most methods developed for LNL. Our LNL+K methods can boost performance even when noise sources are estimated rather than extracted from meta-data. We provide several baseline LNL+K methods that integrate noise source knowledge into state-of-the-art LNL models that are evaluated across six diverse datasets and two types of noise, where we report gains of up to 23% compared to the unadapted methods. Critically, we show that LNL methods fail to generalize on some real-world datasets, even when adapted to integrate noise source knowledge, highlighting the importance of directly exploring LNL+K.
Read more7/16/2024
🏋️
0
PASS: Peer-Agreement based Sample Selection for training with Noisy Labels
Arpit Garg, Cuong Nguyen, Rafael Felix, Thanh-Toan Do, Gustavo Carneiro
The prevalence of noisy-label samples poses a significant challenge in deep learning, inducing overfitting effects. This has, therefore, motivated the emergence of learning with noisy-label (LNL) techniques that focus on separating noisy- and clean-label samples to apply different learning strategies to each group of samples. Current methodologies often rely on the small-loss hypothesis or feature-based selection to separate noisy- and clean-label samples, yet our empirical observations reveal their limitations, especially for labels with instance dependent noise (IDN). An important characteristic of IDN is the difficulty to distinguish the clean-label samples that lie near the decision boundary (i.e., the hard samples) from the noisy-label samples. We, therefore, propose a new noisy-label detection method, termed Peer-Agreement based Sample Selection (PASS), to address this problem. Utilising a trio of classifiers, PASS employs consensus-driven peer-based agreement of two models to select the samples to train the remaining model. PASS is easily integrated into existing LNL models, enabling the improvement of the detection accuracy of noisy- and clean-label samples, which increases the classification accuracy across various LNL benchmarks.
Read more5/1/2024