Instigating Cooperation among LLM Agents Using Adaptive Information Modulation

Read original: arXiv:2409.10372 - Published 9/17/2024 by Qiliang Chen (Sepehr), Alireza (Sepehr), Ilami, Nunzio Lore, Babak Heydari
Total Score

0

Instigating Cooperation among LLM Agents Using Adaptive Information Modulation

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores techniques for instigating cooperation among large language model (LLM) agents.
  • The key ideas involve adaptive information modulation to encourage cooperative behavior.
  • Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach in fostering collaboration between LLM agents.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses ways to get large language model (LLM) agents to work together cooperatively. The main idea is to use adaptive information modulation, which means adjusting how much information the agents can access or share with each other.

By controlling the flow of information, the researchers were able to incentivize the LLM agents to cooperate and coordinate their actions, rather than acting selfishly or in competition with each other. The experiments showed this approach was effective at fostering collaboration between the agents.

This is an important area of research, as developing techniques for multi-agent cooperation is crucial for building AI systems that can work together to solve complex problems. The ability of LLMs to engage in cooperative behavior could have many applications, such as in social simulations or collaborative task completion in the real world.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a novel approach for instigating cooperation among LLM agents through the use of adaptive information modulation. The key idea is to dynamically control the amount of information available to each agent, incentivizing them to collaborate rather than act selfishly.

The researchers designed an experimental setup where multiple LLM agents were tasked with cooperatively solving a problem. By adaptively adjusting the information each agent could access, the authors were able to steer the agents towards more cooperative behavior. This was achieved through a feedback loop that monitored the agents' actions and adjusted the information flow accordingly.

The experiments demonstrated that this adaptive information modulation technique was effective at promoting cooperation, with the LLM agents exhibiting increased coordination and joint problem-solving capabilities compared to a control group. The authors also explored how factors such as the agents' initial knowledge and the problem's complexity influenced the effectiveness of their approach.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach for encouraging cooperation among LLM agents, which is an important challenge in the field of multi-agent systems. The use of adaptive information modulation is a novel and interesting concept, and the experimental results suggest it can be an effective technique for fostering collaboration.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations or caveats of this approach. For example, it is unclear how well the technique would scale to larger numbers of agents or more complex problem-solving scenarios. Additionally, the paper does not explore the long-term stability of the cooperative behavior or whether the agents might eventually revert to more selfish strategies.

Further research could also investigate the ethical implications of this type of information control, as well as the potential for unintended consequences or manipulation of the agents' behavior. It would be valuable to see the researchers address these types of concerns in future work.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach for instigating cooperation among LLM agents using adaptive information modulation. The key idea is to dynamically control the flow of information available to each agent, incentivizing them to collaborate rather than act selfishly.

The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of this technique in promoting coordination and joint problem-solving among the LLM agents. This research represents an important step forward in developing AI systems that can work together cooperatively to tackle complex challenges.

While the paper raises some interesting questions about the long-term stability and potential ethical implications of this approach, the authors have made a valuable contribution to the field of multi-agent systems. Further exploration of these ideas could lead to significant advancements in the ability of AI agents to collaborate and solve problems in the real world.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Instigating Cooperation among LLM Agents Using Adaptive Information Modulation
Total Score

0

New!Instigating Cooperation among LLM Agents Using Adaptive Information Modulation

Qiliang Chen (Sepehr), Alireza (Sepehr), Ilami, Nunzio Lore, Babak Heydari

This paper introduces a novel framework combining LLM agents as proxies for human strategic behavior with reinforcement learning (RL) to engage these agents in evolving strategic interactions within team environments. Our approach extends traditional agent-based simulations by using strategic LLM agents (SLA) and introducing dynamic and adaptive governance through a pro-social promoting RL agent (PPA) that modulates information access across agents in a network, optimizing social welfare and promoting pro-social behavior. Through validation in iterative games, including the prisoner dilemma, we demonstrate that SLA agents exhibit nuanced strategic adaptations. The PPA agent effectively learns to adjust information transparency, resulting in enhanced cooperation rates. This framework offers significant insights into AI-mediated social dynamics, contributing to the deployment of AI in real-world team settings.

Read more

9/17/2024

Embodied LLM Agents Learn to Cooperate in Organized Teams
Total Score

0

Embodied LLM Agents Learn to Cooperate in Organized Teams

Xudong Guo, Kaixuan Huang, Jiale Liu, Wenhui Fan, Natalia V'elez, Qingyun Wu, Huazheng Wang, Thomas L. Griffiths, Mengdi Wang

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as integral tools for reasoning, planning, and decision-making, drawing upon their extensive world knowledge and proficiency in language-related tasks. LLMs thus hold tremendous potential for natural language interaction within multi-agent systems to foster cooperation. However, LLM agents tend to over-report and comply with any instruction, which may result in information redundancy and confusion in multi-agent cooperation. Inspired by human organizations, this paper introduces a framework that imposes prompt-based organization structures on LLM agents to mitigate these problems. Through a series of experiments with embodied LLM agents and human-agent collaboration, our results highlight the impact of designated leadership on team efficiency, shedding light on the leadership qualities displayed by LLM agents and their spontaneous cooperative behaviors. Further, we harness the potential of LLMs to propose enhanced organizational prompts, via a Criticize-Reflect process, resulting in novel organization structures that reduce communication costs and enhance team efficiency.

Read more

5/24/2024

Exploring Collaboration Mechanisms for LLM Agents: A Social Psychology View
Total Score

0

Exploring Collaboration Mechanisms for LLM Agents: A Social Psychology View

Jintian Zhang, Xin Xu, Ningyu Zhang, Ruibo Liu, Bryan Hooi, Shumin Deng

As Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems are increasingly employed in intricate social environments, a pressing query emerges: Can these NLP systems mirror human-esque collaborative intelligence, in a multi-agent society consisting of multiple large language models (LLMs)? This paper probes the collaboration mechanisms among contemporary NLP systems by melding practical experiments with theoretical insights. We fabricate four unique `societies' comprised of LLM agents, where each agent is characterized by a specific `trait' (easy-going or overconfident) and engages in collaboration with a distinct `thinking pattern' (debate or reflection). Through evaluating these multi-agent societies on three benchmark datasets, we discern that certain collaborative strategies not only outshine previous top-tier approaches, but also optimize efficiency (using fewer API tokens). Moreover, our results further illustrate that LLM agents manifest human-like social behaviors, such as conformity and consensus reaching, mirroring foundational social psychology theories. In conclusion, we integrate insights from social psychology to contextualize the collaboration of LLM agents, inspiring further investigations into the collaboration mechanism for LLMs. We commit to sharing our code and datasetsfootnote{url{https://github.com/zjunlp/MachineSoM}.}, hoping to catalyze further research in this promising avenue.

Read more

5/28/2024

Autonomous Agents for Collaborative Task under Information Asymmetry
Total Score

0

Autonomous Agents for Collaborative Task under Information Asymmetry

Wei Liu, Chenxi Wang, Yifei Wang, Zihao Xie, Rennai Qiu, Yufan Dang, Zhuoyun Du, Weize Chen, Cheng Yang, Chen Qian

Large Language Model Multi-Agent Systems (LLM-MAS) have achieved great progress in solving complex tasks. It performs communication among agents within the system to collaboratively solve tasks, under the premise of shared information. However, when agents' communication is leveraged to enhance human cooperation, a new challenge arises due to information asymmetry, since each agent can only access the information of its human user. Previous MAS struggle to complete tasks under this condition. To address this, we propose a new MAS paradigm termed iAgents, which denotes Informative Multi-Agent Systems. In iAgents, the human social network is mirrored in the agent network, where agents proactively exchange human information necessary for task resolution, thereby overcoming information asymmetry. iAgents employs a novel agent reasoning mechanism, InfoNav, to navigate agents' communication towards effective information exchange. Together with InfoNav, iAgents organizes human information in a mixed memory to provide agents with accurate and comprehensive information for exchange. Additionally, we introduce InformativeBench, the first benchmark tailored for evaluating LLM agents' task-solving ability under information asymmetry. Experimental results show that iAgents can collaborate within a social network of 140 individuals and 588 relationships, autonomously communicate over 30 turns, and retrieve information from nearly 70,000 messages to complete tasks within 3 minutes.

Read more

6/24/2024