Instruct, Not Assist: LLM-based Multi-Turn Planning and Hierarchical Questioning for Socratic Code Debugging
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel approach for Socratic code debugging using large language models (LLMs) that can engage in multi-turn planning and hierarchical questioning.
- The proposed system, called "Instruct, Not Assist," aims to guide developers through the debugging process by actively instructing them, rather than simply providing solutions or assistance.
- The system leverages LLM capabilities to generate targeted questions and prompts that help developers reason about their code, identify issues, and arrive at solutions on their own.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new way to debug code using large language models (LLMs) – AI systems trained on vast amounts of text data. The key idea is to have the LLM act as a "Socratic" tutor, asking thoughtful questions to guide the developer through the debugging process, rather than just giving them the answers.
The system, called "Instruct, Not Assist," is designed to help developers understand their code better and figure out issues on their own. Instead of simply providing solutions, the LLM generates a series of targeted questions and prompts that make the developer think critically about their code. This "Socratic" approach is intended to foster deeper learning and problem-solving skills, rather than just handing over the fix.
For example, if a developer is trying to debug a piece of code, the LLM might ask questions like "What is the expected behavior of this function?" or "Can you walk me through the control flow of your code?" These questions are aimed at getting the developer to reflect on their own understanding and identify potential problem areas, rather than just telling them what's wrong.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a novel Socratic Planner architecture that leverages the multi-turn planning and hierarchical questioning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) to guide developers through the code debugging process.
The system first prompts the developer to describe the problem they are facing, and then uses this input to generate a series of clarifying questions and debugging prompts. These prompts are designed to elicit responses from the developer that help the system build a deeper understanding of the issue, identify potential root causes, and formulate a step-by-step plan to guide the developer towards a solution.
The authors draw inspiration from techniques like data augmentation and multi-round dialogue to enhance the system's ability to engage in targeted, hierarchical questioning and maintain a coherent, goal-oriented interaction. Additionally, the system incorporates chain-of-thought techniques to improve the reliability and trustworthiness of the generated debugging guidance.
Critical Analysis
The authors acknowledge that their approach requires the LLM to have a deep understanding of programming concepts and debugging strategies, which may be challenging to achieve in practice. There are also potential issues around the system's ability to handle open-ended or complex coding problems, as well as its reliability and consistency in generating high-quality guidance.
Additionally, the paper does not address the potential for the system to inadvertently introduce or reinforce biases or misconceptions in the developer's understanding, which could be a concern if the system is not carefully designed and evaluated.
Further research is needed to fully understand the limitations and potential negative impacts of this approach, as well as to explore ways to enhance the system's capabilities and ensure its robust and beneficial deployment in real-world software development workflows.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach for using large language models to guide developers through the code debugging process in a Socratic, instructive manner, rather than simply providing solutions or assistance. The proposed "Instruct, Not Assist" system leverages the multi-turn planning and hierarchical questioning capabilities of LLMs to engage developers in a targeted, goal-oriented dialogue aimed at fostering deeper understanding and problem-solving skills.
While the approach shows promise, the authors acknowledge several technical and practical challenges that will need to be addressed through further research and development. Nonetheless, this work represents an exciting step towards the integration of advanced AI technologies into the software engineering workflow, with the potential to enhance developer productivity, learning, and problem-solving abilities.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Instruct, Not Assist: LLM-based Multi-Turn Planning and Hierarchical Questioning for Socratic Code Debugging
Priyanka Kargupta, Ishika Agarwal, Dilek Hakkani-Tur, Jiawei Han
Socratic questioning is an effective teaching strategy, encouraging critical thinking and problem-solving. The conversational capabilities of large language models (LLMs) show great potential for providing scalable, real-time student guidance. However, current LLMs often give away solutions directly, making them ineffective instructors. We tackle this issue in the code debugging domain with TreeInstruct, an Instructor agent guided by a novel state space-based planning algorithm. TreeInstruct asks probing questions to help students independently identify and resolve errors. It estimates a student's conceptual and syntactical knowledge to dynamically construct a question tree based on their responses and current knowledge state, effectively addressing both independent and dependent mistakes concurrently in a multi-turn interaction setting. In addition to using an existing single-bug debugging benchmark, we construct a more challenging multi-bug dataset of 150 coding problems, incorrect solutions, and bug fixes -- all carefully constructed and annotated by experts. Extensive evaluation shows TreeInstruct's state-of-the-art performance on both datasets, proving it to be a more effective instructor than baselines. Furthermore, a real-world case study with five students of varying skill levels further demonstrates TreeInstruct's ability to guide students to debug their code efficiently with minimal turns and highly Socratic questioning. We provide our code and datasets at http://github.com/agarwalishika/TreeInstruct .
Read more8/21/2024
0
Boosting Large Language Models with Socratic Method for Conversational Mathematics Teaching
Yuyang Ding, Hanglei Hu, Jie Zhou, Qin Chen, Bo Jiang, Liang He
With the introduction of large language models (LLMs), automatic math reasoning has seen tremendous success. However, current methods primarily focus on providing solutions or using techniques like Chain-of-Thought to enhance problem-solving accuracy. In this paper, we focus on improving the capability of mathematics teaching via a Socratic teaching-based LLM (texttt{SocraticLLM}), which guides learners toward profound thinking with clarity and self-discovery via conversation. We collect and release a high-quality mathematical teaching dataset, named texttt{SocraticMATH}, which provides Socratic-style conversations of problems with extra knowledge. Also, we propose a knowledge-enhanced LLM as a strong baseline to generate reliable responses with review, guidance/heuristic, rectification, and summarization. Experimental results show the great advantages of texttt{SocraticLLM} by comparing it with several strong generative models. The codes and datasets are available on url{https://github.com/ECNU-ICALK/SocraticMath}.
Read more7/25/2024
0
Improving Socratic Question Generation using Data Augmentation and Preference Optimization
Nischal Ashok Kumar, Andrew Lan
The Socratic method is a way of guiding students toward solving a problem independently without directly revealing the solution to the problem. Although this method has been shown to significantly improve student learning outcomes, it remains a complex labor-intensive task for instructors. Large language models (LLMs) can be used to augment human effort by automatically generating Socratic questions for students. However, existing methods that involve prompting these LLMs sometimes produce invalid outputs, e.g., those that directly reveal the solution to the problem or provide irrelevant or premature questions. To alleviate this problem, inspired by reinforcement learning with AI feedback (RLAIF), we first propose a data augmentation method to enrich existing Socratic questioning datasets with questions that are invalid in specific ways. Next, we propose a method to optimize open-source LLMs such as LLama 2 to prefer ground-truth questions over generated invalid ones, using direct preference optimization (DPO). Our experiments on a Socratic questions dataset for student code debugging show that a DPO-optimized 7B LLama 2 model can effectively avoid generating invalid questions, and as a result, outperforms existing state-of-the-art prompting methods.
Read more4/22/2024
0
SPL: A Socratic Playground for Learning Powered by Large Language Mode
Liang Zhang, Jionghao Lin, Ziyi Kuang, Sheng Xu, Mohammed Yeasin, Xiangen Hu
Dialogue-based Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs) have significantly advanced adaptive and personalized learning by automating sophisticated human tutoring strategies within interactive dialogues. However, replicating the nuanced patterns of expert human communication remains a challenge in Natural Language Processing (NLP). Recent advancements in NLP, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs) such as OpenAI's GPT-4, offer promising solutions by providing human-like and context-aware responses based on extensive pre-trained knowledge. Motivated by the effectiveness of LLMs in various educational tasks (e.g., content creation and summarization, problem-solving, and automated feedback provision), our study introduces the Socratic Playground for Learning (SPL), a dialogue-based ITS powered by the GPT-4 model, which employs the Socratic teaching method to foster critical thinking among learners. Through extensive prompt engineering, SPL can generate specific learning scenarios and facilitates efficient multi-turn tutoring dialogues. The SPL system aims to enhance personalized and adaptive learning experiences tailored to individual needs, specifically focusing on improving critical thinking skills. Our pilot experimental results from essay writing tasks demonstrate SPL has the potential to improve tutoring interactions and further enhance dialogue-based ITS functionalities. Our study, exemplified by SPL, demonstrates how LLMs enhance dialogue-based ITSs and expand the accessibility and efficacy of educational technologies.
Read more6/24/2024