Instruction Finetuning for Leaderboard Generation from Empirical AI Research

Read original: arXiv:2408.10141 - Published 8/20/2024 by Salomon Kabongo, Jennifer D'Souza
Total Score

0

🛸

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The provided paper discusses a novel approach to fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) for leaderboard generation using instruction-based learning.
  • The key idea is to leverage empirical AI research papers as a source of diverse task-specific instructions, which are then used to fine-tune the LLM.
  • The fine-tuned model can then be used to generate leaderboard-style output for new AI tasks, without the need for manually curated training data.

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a way to train large language models to become better at generating leaderboard-style output for various AI tasks. The researchers found that they could fine-tune these models by using the instructions and descriptions from empirical AI research papers as a source of training data.

The idea is that the language used in these research papers, which outline specific AI tasks and how to approach them, can be leveraged to teach the language model how to generate high-quality leaderboard output. This is valuable because it can be difficult and time-consuming to create large, manually curated datasets for training models to do this type of task.

By using the existing research papers as a source of training data, the researchers were able to fine-tune the language model to perform well on generating leaderboard-style output for a variety of AI tasks, without having to build those datasets from scratch.

Technical Explanation

The key technical contribution of the paper is the Instruction Finetuning approach, where the researchers use the instructions and descriptions from empirical AI research papers as a source of training data to fine-tune a large language model.

The high-level process is as follows:

  1. The researchers first mined a large corpus of AI research papers and extracted the task descriptions and instructions from the text.
  2. They then used this extracted "instruction data" to fine-tune a pre-trained language model, such as GPT-3, through a process called instruction finetuning.
  3. The fine-tuned model was then evaluated on its ability to generate leaderboard-style output for new AI tasks, without any additional training on those specific tasks.

The key insight is that the language used to describe AI tasks in research papers can serve as a rich source of training data to imbue the language model with the necessary skills to generate high-quality leaderboard output. This avoids the need for manually curating large datasets for each new task.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research in their paper:

  • The quality and consistency of the generated leaderboard output is still an area for improvement, as the fine-tuned models sometimes produce incoherent or low-quality results.
  • The approach is heavily dependent on the quality and coverage of the research paper corpus used for instruction finetuning, which may not be comprehensive for all possible AI tasks.
  • There is a need for more automated methods to extract high-quality instructions from research papers, as the current extraction process is still quite manual.

Additionally, while the paper demonstrates the potential of instruction finetuning for leaderboard generation, further research is needed to understand the broader applicability of this approach to other types of AI task generation and benchmarking.

Conclusion

The key takeaway from this paper is the idea of leveraging empirical AI research as a source of training data for fine-tuning large language models. By extracting the task instructions and descriptions from research papers, the researchers were able to imbue their language model with the necessary skills to generate leaderboard-style output for a variety of AI tasks.

This approach has the potential to streamline the process of creating high-quality benchmarks and leaderboards for the AI research community, as it reduces the need for manually curated training datasets. As the field of AI continues to evolve rapidly, techniques like instruction finetuning may become increasingly important for managing the growing complexity of AI systems and tasks.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🛸

Total Score

0

Instruction Finetuning for Leaderboard Generation from Empirical AI Research

Salomon Kabongo, Jennifer D'Souza

This study demonstrates the application of instruction finetuning of pretrained Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate the generation of AI research leaderboards, extracting (Task, Dataset, Metric, Score) quadruples from articles. It aims to streamline the dissemination of advancements in AI research by transitioning from traditional, manual community curation, or otherwise taxonomy-constrained natural language inference (NLI) models, to an automated, generative LLM-based approach. Utilizing the FLAN-T5 model, this research enhances LLMs' adaptability and reliability in information extraction, offering a novel method for structured knowledge representation.

Read more

8/20/2024

Exploring the Latest LLMs for Leaderboard Extraction
Total Score

0

Exploring the Latest LLMs for Leaderboard Extraction

Salomon Kabongo, Jennifer D'Souza, Soren Auer

The rapid advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have opened new avenues for automating complex tasks in AI research. This paper investigates the efficacy of different LLMs-Mistral 7B, Llama-2, GPT-4-Turbo and GPT-4.o in extracting leaderboard information from empirical AI research articles. We explore three types of contextual inputs to the models: DocTAET (Document Title, Abstract, Experimental Setup, and Tabular Information), DocREC (Results, Experiments, and Conclusions), and DocFULL (entire document). Our comprehensive study evaluates the performance of these models in generating (Task, Dataset, Metric, Score) quadruples from research papers. The findings reveal significant insights into the strengths and limitations of each model and context type, providing valuable guidance for future AI research automation efforts.

Read more

7/10/2024

Efficient Performance Tracking: Leveraging Large Language Models for Automated Construction of Scientific Leaderboards
Total Score

0

Efficient Performance Tracking: Leveraging Large Language Models for Automated Construction of Scientific Leaderboards

Furkan c{S}ahinuc{c}, Thy Thy Tran, Yulia Grishina, Yufang Hou, Bei Chen, Iryna Gurevych

Scientific leaderboards are standardized ranking systems that facilitate evaluating and comparing competitive methods. Typically, a leaderboard is defined by a task, dataset, and evaluation metric (TDM) triple, allowing objective performance assessment and fostering innovation through benchmarking. However, the exponential increase in publications has made it infeasible to construct and maintain these leaderboards manually. Automatic leaderboard construction has emerged as a solution to reduce manual labor. Existing datasets for this task are based on the community-contributed leaderboards without additional curation. Our analysis shows that a large portion of these leaderboards are incomplete, and some of them contain incorrect information. In this work, we present SciLead, a manually-curated Scientific Leaderboard dataset that overcomes the aforementioned problems. Building on this dataset, we propose three experimental settings that simulate real-world scenarios where TDM triples are fully defined, partially defined, or undefined during leaderboard construction. While previous research has only explored the first setting, the latter two are more representative of real-world applications. To address these diverse settings, we develop a comprehensive LLM-based framework for constructing leaderboards. Our experiments and analysis reveal that various LLMs often correctly identify TDM triples while struggling to extract result values from publications. We make our code and data publicly available.

Read more

9/20/2024

Knowledge AI: Fine-tuning NLP Models for Facilitating Scientific Knowledge Extraction and Understanding
Total Score

0

Knowledge AI: Fine-tuning NLP Models for Facilitating Scientific Knowledge Extraction and Understanding

Balaji Muralidharan, Hayden Beadles, Reza Marzban, Kalyan Sashank Mupparaju

This project investigates the efficacy of Large Language Models (LLMs) in understanding and extracting scientific knowledge across specific domains and to create a deep learning framework: Knowledge AI. As a part of this framework, we employ pre-trained models and fine-tune them on datasets in the scientific domain. The models are adapted for four key Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks: summarization, text generation, question answering, and named entity recognition. Our results indicate that domain-specific fine-tuning significantly enhances model performance in each of these tasks, thereby improving their applicability for scientific contexts. This adaptation enables non-experts to efficiently query and extract information within targeted scientific fields, demonstrating the potential of fine-tuned LLMs as a tool for knowledge discovery in the sciences.

Read more

8/12/2024