Instruction Tuning for Secure Code Generation
0
🛸
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Modern language models (LMs) have become widely used in programming and other contexts
- A key technique enabling this is instruction tuning, which trains LMs to follow user instructions and preferences
- However, existing instruction tuning approaches often overlook the security of the generated code, leading to unsafe outputs and security risks
- This paper introduces SafeCoder, a technique that performs security-focused fine-tuning of LMs to improve the safety of generated code while preserving utility
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 have become incredibly powerful and are now used in all sorts of everyday and professional applications, including programming. A key reason for this is a technique called "instruction tuning," which trains the models to follow human instructions and preferences.
However, the existing instruction tuning approaches have a major flaw - they don't consider the security of the code that the models generate. As a result, even the latest instruction-tuned LLMs can sometimes produce code that has security vulnerabilities, which could lead to serious problems.
To address this gap, the researchers created a new system called SafeCoder. SafeCoder uses a specialized training dataset and process to fine-tune LLMs not just for general usefulness, but specifically for generating secure code. The goal is to get the best of both worlds - code that is both helpful and safe.
The key idea behind SafeCoder is to combine the standard instruction tuning approach with an additional step focused on security. The researchers show that this simple but effective technique can significantly improve the security of code generated by LLMs, while still preserving the models' overall utility and usefulness.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces SafeCoder, a technique that enhances language models' (LMs) instruction-following capabilities with a focus on generating secure code. Existing instruction tuning approaches, such as InverseCodeR and Constrained Decoding, overlook the crucial aspect of security, leading to LMs producing unsafe code with significant security risks.
SafeCoder addresses this gap by integrating security-centric fine-tuning with standard instruction tuning. The researchers collected a diverse, high-quality dataset using an automated pipeline, and used this to fine-tune LMs with a focus on security properties, in addition to the standard instruction tuning.
The authors show that this simple yet effective approach is able to substantially improve the security of generated code (by around 30%) across a variety of popular LMs and datasets, while preserving the overall utility of the models. This is a significant advancement, as prior work like From Symbolic Tasks to Code Generation: Diversification and Contrastive Instruction Tuning has struggled to jointly optimize security and utility.
Critical Analysis
The key strength of SafeCoder is its ability to enhance the security of generated code without compromising overall utility, which is a critical limitation of prior work. The authors provide a thoughtful discussion of the potential limitations and areas for further research.
One limitation mentioned is the reliance on a specific security-focused dataset, which may not fully capture the breadth of security considerations in real-world code. Additionally, the evaluation is primarily focused on code generation, and the security implications for other language model applications are not explored.
Another potential issue is the scalability of the security fine-tuning approach. As language models continue to grow in size and complexity, the computational and data requirements for this specialized fine-tuning may become increasingly challenging.
Further research could explore ways to make the security fine-tuning more efficient, or to incorporate security considerations more deeply into the core language model architecture, rather than as a separate fine-tuning step. Investigating the security implications of instruction-tuned models in other domains, such as text generation or dialogue, could also be a fruitful area of study.
Overall, the SafeCoder approach represents a significant step forward in addressing the critical security challenges posed by the widespread adoption of language models, and the paper provides a solid foundation for future work in this important area.
Conclusion
This paper introduces SafeCoder, a technique that enhances language models' instruction-following capabilities with a focus on generating secure code. By integrating security-centric fine-tuning with standard instruction tuning, SafeCoder is able to substantially improve the security of generated code while preserving overall utility.
The key contribution of this work is addressing a crucial gap in existing instruction tuning approaches, which have overlooked the crucial aspect of security. SafeCoder's simple but effective approach demonstrates the potential to make language models more secure and trustworthy in a wide range of programming and software development applications.
As language models continue to become more prominent in everyday and professional contexts, ensuring their safe and responsible use will be of paramount importance. The insights and techniques presented in this paper represent an important step forward in this direction, and could have significant implications for the future of language model-powered systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🛸
0
Instruction Tuning for Secure Code Generation
Jingxuan He, Mark Vero, Gabriela Krasnopolska, Martin Vechev
Modern language models (LMs) have gained widespread acceptance in everyday and professional contexts, particularly in programming. An essential procedure enabling this adoption is instruction tuning, which substantially enhances LMs' practical utility by training them to follow user instructions and human preferences. However, existing instruction tuning schemes overlook a crucial aspect: the security of generated code. As a result, even the state-of-the-art instruction-tuned LMs frequently produce unsafe code, posing significant security risks. In this work, we introduce SafeCoder to address this gap. SafeCoder performs security-centric fine-tuning using a diverse and high-quality dataset that we collected using an automated pipeline. We integrate the security fine-tuning with standard instruction tuning, to facilitate a joint optimization of both security and utility. Despite its simplicity, we show that SafeCoder is effective across a variety of popular LMs and datasets. It is able to drastically improve security (by about 30%), while preserving utility.
Read more7/15/2024
0
How Do Your Code LLMs Perform? Empowering Code Instruction Tuning with High-Quality Data
Yejie Wang, Keqing He, Dayuan Fu, Zhuoma Gongque, Heyang Xu, Yanxu Chen, Zhexu Wang, Yujia Fu, Guanting Dong, Muxi Diao, Jingang Wang, Mengdi Zhang, Xunliang Cai, Weiran Xu
Recently, there has been a growing interest in studying how to construct better code instruction tuning data. However, we observe Code models trained with these datasets exhibit high performance on HumanEval but perform worse on other benchmarks such as LiveCodeBench. Upon further investigation, we find that many datasets suffer from severe data leakage. After cleaning up most of the leaked data, some well-known high-quality datasets perform poorly. This discovery reveals a new challenge: identifying which dataset genuinely qualify as high-quality code instruction data. To address this, we propose an efficient code data pruning strategy for selecting good samples. Our approach is based on three dimensions: instruction complexity, response quality, and instruction diversity. Based on our selected data, we present XCoder, a family of models finetuned from LLaMA3. Our experiments show XCoder achieves new state-of-the-art performance using fewer training data, which verify the effectiveness of our data strategy. Moreover, we perform a comprehensive analysis on the data composition and find existing code datasets have different characteristics according to their construction methods, which provide new insights for future code LLMs. Our models and dataset are released in https://github.com/banksy23/XCoder
Read more9/9/2024
18
WaveCoder: Widespread And Versatile Enhancement For Code Large Language Models By Instruction Tuning
Zhaojian Yu, Xin Zhang, Ning Shang, Yangyu Huang, Can Xu, Yishujie Zhao, Wenxiang Hu, Qiufeng Yin
Recent work demonstrates that, after instruction tuning, Code Large Language Models (Code LLMs) can obtain impressive capabilities to address a wide range of code-related tasks. However, current instruction tuning methods for Code LLMs mainly focus on the traditional code generation task, resulting in poor performance in complex multi-task scenarios. In this paper, we concentrate on multiple code-related tasks and present WaveCoder, a series of Code LLMs trained with Widespread And Versatile Enhanced instruction data. To enable the models to tackle complex code-related tasks, we propose a method to stably generate diverse, high-quality instruction data from open source code dataset in multi-task scenarios and obtain CodeSeaXDataset, a dataset comprising 19,915 instruction instances across 4 code-related tasks, which is aimed at improving the generalization ability of Code LLM. Our experiments demonstrate that WaveCoder models significantly outperform other open-source models in terms of the generalization ability across different code-related tasks. Moreover, WaveCoder-Ultra-6.7B presents the state-of-the-art generalization abilities on a wide range of code-related tasks.
Read more6/10/2024
0
Constrained Decoding for Secure Code Generation
Yanjun Fu, Ethan Baker, Yu Ding, Yizheng Chen
Code Large Language Models (Code LLMs) have been increasingly used by developers to boost productivity, but they often generate vulnerable code. Thus, there is an urgent need to ensure that code generated by Code LLMs is correct and secure. Previous research has primarily focused on generating secure code, overlooking the fact that secure code also needs to be correct. This oversight can lead to a false sense of security. Currently, the community lacks a method to measure actual progress in this area, and we need solutions that address both security and correctness of code generation. This paper introduces a new benchmark, CodeGuard+, along with two new metrics, to measure Code LLMs' ability to generate both secure and correct code. Using our new evaluation methods, we show that the state-of-the-art defense technique, prefix tuning, may not be as strong as previously believed, since it generates secure code but sacrifices functional correctness. We also demonstrate that different decoding methods significantly affect the security of Code LLMs. Furthermore, we explore a new defense direction: constrained decoding for secure code generation. We propose new constrained decoding techniques to generate secure code. Our results reveal that constrained decoding is more effective than prefix tuning to improve the security of Code LLMs, without requiring a specialized training dataset. Moreover, our evaluations over eight state-of-the-art Code LLMs show that constrained decoding has strong performance to improve the security of Code LLMs, and our technique outperforms GPT-4.
Read more7/23/2024