InstructTA: Instruction-Tuned Targeted Attack for Large Vision-Language Models

Overview

• Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have impressive capabilities in understanding images and generating responses, but are vulnerable to adversarial attacks.
• This paper proposes a novel and practical targeted attack scenario where the adversary only knows the vision encoder of the victim LVLM, but not the proprietary prompts or underlying language model.
• To address the challenges of cross-prompt and cross-model transferability in this setting, the paper introduces an instruction-tuned targeted attack (InstructTA) approach.

Plain English Explanation

Large vision-language models are AI systems that can both understand images and generate text in response. These models have become incredibly capable, but they also have a weakness - they can be "tricked" by adversarial examples. Adversarial examples are slightly modified inputs (like images) that cause the model to make mistakes, even though the changes may be imperceptible to a human.

In this paper, the researchers present a new type of adversarial attack that is particularly challenging. The attacker only knows part of the victim model - the vision encoder that processes the images. They don't know the rest of the model, including the language model that generates the text responses, or the specific prompts (instructions) used to get the model to produce a desired output.

To overcome this, the researchers developed a technique called InstructTA. The key ideas are:

1. Reverse engineering the target response: First, they use a publicly available text-to-image model to try to figure out what kind of image would produce the target response they want the victim model to give.
2. Inferring the instruction: They then use a large language model (GPT-4) to guess what kind of instruction or prompt would lead the victim model to generate that target response.
3. Optimizing the adversarial example: With this information, they can build a "local surrogate model" that shares the vision encoder with the victim model. They then optimize an adversarial image that will make the surrogate model produce features similar to the target image, in the hopes that this will also trick the victim model.
4. Improving transferability: To further improve the chances of the attack working on the actual victim model, they augment the instruction with paraphrased versions generated by GPT-4.

The researchers show that this approach outperforms other adversarial attack methods in terms of both attack success and the ability to transfer the attack to different models and prompts.

Technical Explanation

The key technical components of the InstructTA approach are:

1. Reverse Image Generation: The researchers use a publicly available text-to-image generative model to convert the target response text into a corresponding target image.
2. Instruction Inference: They then employ the large language model GPT-4 to infer a reasonable instruction $\boldsymbol{p}'$ that could lead the victim LVLM to generate the target response.
3. Local Surrogate Model: To overcome the lack of knowledge about the victim LVLM's prompts and underlying language model, the researchers form a local surrogate model that shares the same vision encoder as the victim LVLM. This allows them to extract instruction-aware features of the adversarial image example and the target image.
4. Optimization: They then minimize the distance between these two sets of features to optimize the adversarial example.
5. Instruction Tuning: To further improve transferability, the researchers augment the inferred instruction $\boldsymbol{p}'$ with additional instructions paraphrased by GPT-4.

The researchers evaluate their InstructTA approach through extensive experiments and demonstrate its superiority in targeted attack performance and transferability compared to other methods.

Critical Analysis

The researchers address an important and practical challenge in securing large vision-language models against adversarial attacks. Their InstructTA approach is novel and shows promising results, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

1. Dependence on Proxy Models: The approach relies on the availability of a public text-to-image model and GPT-4 to reverse engineer the target response and infer the instruction. The performance may be affected if these proxy models are not sufficiently accurate or transferable.
2. Scalability: The need to build a local surrogate model may limit the scalability of the approach, especially for very large victim models.
3. Real-World Applicability: The paper focuses on a specific targeted attack scenario, but the practicality and effectiveness of the approach in real-world settings with diverse adversarial goals and constraints remains to be explored.

Overall, the InstructTA approach represents an interesting and valuable contribution to the field of adversarial attacks on large vision-language models. The researchers have identified an important practical challenge and proposed a novel solution, which opens up avenues for further research and development in this area.

Conclusion

This paper proposes a novel InstructTA approach to deliver targeted adversarial attacks on large vision-language models (LVLMs) in a practical setting where the attacker only has access to the victim's vision encoder. The key ideas involve reverse engineering the target response, inferring the instruction, and optimizing an adversarial example using a local surrogate model.

The researchers demonstrate the superiority of their approach in terms of attack performance and transferability, highlighting the importance of addressing practical adversarial challenges in the deployment of powerful AI models. While the approach has some limitations, it represents an important step forward in securing LVLMs against malicious attacks and paves the way for further research in this critical area.