Rethinking the Integration of Prediction and Planning in Deep Learning-Based Automated Driving Systems: A Review
0
🔮
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Automated driving has the potential to revolutionize personal, public, and freight mobility.
- Accurately perceiving the environment and planning a safe, comfortable, and efficient motion trajectory are critical for automated vehicles.
- Many works rely on modules that predict the future motion of surrounding traffic to promote safety and progress.
- Modular automated driving systems commonly handle prediction and planning as sequential, separate tasks.
- Recent models increasingly integrate prediction and planning in a joint or interdependent step to model bi-directional interactions.
Plain English Explanation
Automated driving, or self-driving technology, has the potential to completely transform the way we move around, whether it's for personal, public, or commercial transportation. For these vehicles to work effectively, they need to be able to accurately perceive and understand their surroundings, and then plan a safe, comfortable, and efficient way to travel from one point to another.
To help ensure the safety and progress of automated driving, many researchers have developed systems that can predict the future movements of other vehicles and objects around the automated vehicle. These prediction modules are often separate from the planning modules that actually control the vehicle's motion. While this approach accounts for the influence of surrounding traffic, it fails to anticipate how other vehicles might react to the automated vehicle's own behavior.
More recently, researchers have started to integrate the prediction and planning components into a single, interconnected system. This allows the automated vehicle to model the back-and-forth interactions between its own actions and the responses of other traffic participants. By considering these bidirectional interactions, the vehicle can make more informed and safer decisions about how to navigate its environment.
Technical Explanation
The paper provides a comprehensive review of state-of-the-art deep learning-based prediction and planning models for automated driving systems. It focuses on the integration of prediction and planning, examining different approaches to combining these two key components.
Traditionally, automated driving systems have handled prediction and planning as separate, sequential tasks. While this accounts for the influence of surrounding traffic on the ego vehicle, it fails to anticipate the reactions of other traffic participants to the ego vehicle's own behavior. To address this limitation, recent models have increasingly integrated prediction and planning in a joint or interdependent step, allowing for the modeling of bi-directional interactions.
The paper systematically examines various facets of the integration, including model architecture, model design, and behavioral aspects. It discusses the implications, strengths, and limitations of different integration principles, and identifies promising directions for future research in this area.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable and thorough overview of the current state of research on integrated prediction and planning for automated driving systems. By highlighting the limitations of traditional modular approaches and the potential benefits of more integrated models, the authors make a compelling case for the importance of this line of inquiry.
One area that could use further exploration is the practical implementation and real-world performance of these integrated models. The paper focuses primarily on the theoretical and architectural aspects, but more empirical evidence on the practical advantages and challenges of deploying such systems would be helpful for understanding their true potential and limitations.
Additionally, the paper could delve deeper into the ethical and societal implications of these advanced automated driving systems. As these technologies become more sophisticated and integrated, it will be crucial to consider their impact on issues like safety, equity, and the future of transportation.
Overall, the paper provides a valuable contribution to the field and identifies promising directions for future research, such as enhancing planning with physics-informed safety controllers, addressing the challenges and frontiers of end-to-end autonomous driving, and developing scalable and efficient interaction-aware planning for autonomy.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art in deep learning-based prediction and planning for automated driving systems. It highlights the importance of integrating these two key components to better model the bidirectional interactions between the automated vehicle and its surrounding traffic participants.
By examining different integration principles and their implications, the authors provide valuable insights into the current research landscape and identify promising directions for future work, such as generative learning for HD map-free autonomous driving and planning with adaptive world models for autonomous driving. As automated driving technology continues to advance, this integrated approach to prediction and planning will be crucial for ensuring the safety, comfort, and efficiency of these systems in the real world.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔮
0
Rethinking the Integration of Prediction and Planning in Deep Learning-Based Automated Driving Systems: A Review
Steffen Hagedorn, Marcel Hallgarten, Martin Stoll, Alexandru Condurache
Automated driving has the potential to revolutionize personal, public, and freight mobility. Beside accurately perceiving the environment, automated vehicles must plan a safe, comfortable, and efficient motion trajectory. To promote safety and progress, many works rely on modules that predict the future motion of surrounding traffic. Modular automated driving systems commonly handle prediction and planning as sequential, separate tasks. While this accounts for the influence of surrounding traffic on the ego vehicle, it fails to anticipate the reactions of traffic participants to the ego vehicle's behavior. Recent methods increasingly integrate prediction and planning in a joint or interdependent step to model bidirectional interactions. To date, a comprehensive overview of different integration principles is lacking. We systematically review state-of-the-art deep learning-based planning systems, and focus on how they integrate prediction. Different facets of the integration ranging from system architecture to high-level behavioral aspects are considered and related to each other. Moreover, we discuss the implications, strengths, and limitations of different integration principles. By pointing out research gaps, describing relevant future challenges, and highlighting trends in the research field, we identify promising directions for future research.
Read more9/12/2024
🤖
0
Enhance Planning with Physics-informed Safety Controllor for End-to-end Autonomous Driving
Hang Zhou, Haichao Liu, Hongliang Lu, Dan Xu, Jun Ma, Yiding Ji
Recent years have seen a growing research interest in applications of Deep Neural Networks (DNN) on autonomous vehicle technology. The trend started with perception and prediction a few years ago and it is gradually being applied to motion planning tasks. Despite the performance of networks improve over time, DNN planners inherit the natural drawbacks of Deep Learning. Learning-based planners have limitations in achieving perfect accuracy on the training dataset and network performance can be affected by out-of-distribution problem. In this paper, we propose FusionAssurance, a novel trajectory-based end-to-end driving fusion framework which combines physics-informed control for safety assurance. By incorporating Potential Field into Model Predictive Control, FusionAssurance is capable of navigating through scenarios that are not included in the training dataset and scenarios where neural network fail to generalize. The effectiveness of the approach is demonstrated by extensive experiments under various scenarios on the CARLA benchmark.
Read more5/7/2024
0
End-to-end Autonomous Driving: Challenges and Frontiers
Li Chen, Penghao Wu, Kashyap Chitta, Bernhard Jaeger, Andreas Geiger, Hongyang Li
The autonomous driving community has witnessed a rapid growth in approaches that embrace an end-to-end algorithm framework, utilizing raw sensor input to generate vehicle motion plans, instead of concentrating on individual tasks such as detection and motion prediction. End-to-end systems, in comparison to modular pipelines, benefit from joint feature optimization for perception and planning. This field has flourished due to the availability of large-scale datasets, closed-loop evaluation, and the increasing need for autonomous driving algorithms to perform effectively in challenging scenarios. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive analysis of more than 270 papers, covering the motivation, roadmap, methodology, challenges, and future trends in end-to-end autonomous driving. We delve into several critical challenges, including multi-modality, interpretability, causal confusion, robustness, and world models, amongst others. Additionally, we discuss current advancements in foundation models and visual pre-training, as well as how to incorporate these techniques within the end-to-end driving framework. we maintain an active repository that contains up-to-date literature and open-source projects at https://github.com/OpenDriveLab/End-to-end-Autonomous-Driving.
Read more8/16/2024
0
GAD-Generative Learning for HD Map-Free Autonomous Driving
Weijian Sun, Yanbo Jia, Qi Zeng, Zihao Liu, Jiang Liao, Yue Li, Xianfeng Li
Deep-learning-based techniques have been widely adopted for autonomous driving software stacks for mass production in recent years, focusing primarily on perception modules, with some work extending this method to prediction modules. However, the downstream planning and control modules are still designed with hefty handcrafted rules, dominated by optimization-based methods such as quadratic programming or model predictive control. This results in a performance bottleneck for autonomous driving systems in that corner cases simply cannot be solved by enumerating hand-crafted rules. We present a deep-learning-based approach that brings prediction, decision, and planning modules together with the attempt to overcome the rule-based methods' deficiency in real-world applications of autonomous driving, especially for urban scenes. The DNN model we proposed is solely trained with 10 hours of human driver data, and it supports all mass-production ADAS features available on the market to date. This method is deployed onto a Jiyue test car with no modification to its factory-ready sensor set and compute platform. the feasibility, usability, and commercial potential are demonstrated in this article.
Read more6/3/2024