An Enhanced Prompt-Based LLM Reasoning Scheme via Knowledge Graph-Integrated Collaboration
2402.04978
0
0
🌀
Abstract
While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional performance in a multitude of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, they encounter challenges in practical applications, including issues with hallucinations, inadequate knowledge updating, and limited transparency in the reasoning process. To overcome these limitations, this study innovatively proposes a collaborative training-free reasoning scheme involving tight cooperation between Knowledge Graph (KG) and LLMs. This scheme first involves using LLMs to iteratively explore KG, selectively retrieving a task-relevant knowledge subgraph to support reasoning. The LLMs are then guided to further combine inherent implicit knowledge to reason on the subgraph while explicitly elucidating the reasoning process. Through such a cooperative approach, our scheme achieves more reliable knowledge-based reasoning and facilitates the tracing of the reasoning results. Experimental results show that our scheme significantly progressed across multiple datasets, notably achieving over a 10% improvement on the QALD10 dataset compared to the best baseline and the fine-tuned state-of-the-art (SOTA) work. Building on this success, this study hopes to offer a valuable reference for future research in the fusion of KG and LLMs, thereby enhancing LLMs' proficiency in solving complex issues.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Large language models (LLMs) excel at many natural language processing tasks, but face challenges like hallucinations, limited knowledge updating, and opaque reasoning.
- This study proposes a collaborative training-free reasoning scheme that combines LLMs with knowledge graphs (KGs) to address these limitations.
- The scheme uses LLMs to explore KGs, retrieve relevant knowledge, and reason on the subgraph while explicating the reasoning process.
- Experiments show significant performance improvements, especially on the QALD10 dataset.
- This work aims to serve as a valuable reference for future research on the fusion of KGs and LLMs.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can handle a wide range of natural language tasks, like answering questions or generating text. However, they sometimes struggle with issues like hallucinating - producing plausible-sounding but factually incorrect information - or failing to update their knowledge over time. They can also be opaque, making it hard to understand how they arrived at their conclusions.
To address these limitations, the researchers in this study came up with a new approach that combines LLMs with knowledge graphs (KGs). KGs are structured databases of information that can be used to support reasoning.
The key idea is to have the LLM explore the KG, selectively retrieving the most relevant information to help it reason about a specific task. The LLM then uses this information, along with its own inherent knowledge, to come up with an answer. Importantly, the system also explains the reasoning process, making it more transparent.
Through experiments, the researchers showed that this collaborative approach significantly improved the LLM's performance, especially on a challenging question-answering dataset called QALD10. The results suggest that combining LLMs with structured knowledge can be a powerful way to enhance their abilities and make them more reliable.
Overall, this work offers a promising direction for future research on how to build more capable and trustworthy AI systems by fusing large language models with other knowledge sources.
Technical Explanation
The proposed scheme involves a tight cooperation between knowledge graphs (KGs) and large language models (LLMs). First, the LLM is used to iteratively explore the KG, selectively retrieving a task-relevant knowledge subgraph that can support reasoning.
The LLM is then guided to further combine its inherent implicit knowledge with the information from the subgraph to reason about the task at hand. Crucially, the system also explicitly elucidates the LLM's reasoning process, making it more transparent.
Through this cooperative approach, the scheme aims to achieve more reliable knowledge-based reasoning and facilitate the tracing of reasoning results. Experimental evaluations across multiple datasets show that this approach significantly outperformed baselines and state-of-the-art fine-tuned models, achieving over a 10% improvement on the QALD10 question-answering dataset.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several limitations of their work that merit further investigation. For example, the scheme relies on the availability of a high-quality KG, which may not always be the case in practice. Additionally, the process of selectively retrieving the relevant subgraph from the KG could be further optimized to improve efficiency.
Another potential concern is the generalizability of the approach. While the experiments demonstrate strong performance on specific datasets, it's unclear how well the scheme would scale or transfer to other types of tasks or domains.
Furthermore, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential biases or shortcomings of the underlying LLM. As with many AI systems, there may be inherent biases or limitations that could affect the reliability of the reasoning process.
Overall, this work presents a promising step towards enhancing the reasoning capabilities of LLMs through the integration of structured knowledge. However, further research is needed to address the identified limitations and explore the broader applicability of this collaborative approach.
Conclusion
This study proposes an innovative collaborative training-free reasoning scheme that combines large language models (LLMs) and knowledge graphs (KGs) to address key challenges faced by LLMs, such as hallucinations, inadequate knowledge updating, and limited transparency in the reasoning process.
By having the LLM iteratively explore the KG, retrieve relevant knowledge, and reason on the subgraph while explicating its reasoning, the scheme achieves more reliable knowledge-based reasoning and facilitates the tracing of reasoning results. The experimental results demonstrate significant performance improvements, particularly on the QALD10 dataset.
This work offers a valuable reference for future research on the fusion of KGs and LLMs, with the potential to enhance the proficiency of LLMs in solving complex issues and increasing the transparency and trustworthiness of their reasoning. As the field of AI continues to evolve, such collaborative approaches that combine the strengths of different technologies may hold the key to building more capable and reliable intelligent systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
CuriousLLM: Elevating Multi-Document QA with Reasoning-Infused Knowledge Graph Prompting
Zukang Yang, Zixuan Zhu
0
0
In the field of Question Answering (QA), unifying large language models (LLMs) with external databases has shown great success. However, these methods often fall short in providing the advanced reasoning needed for complex QA tasks. To address these issues, we improve over a novel approach called Knowledge Graph Prompting (KGP), which combines knowledge graphs with a LLM-based agent to improve reasoning and search accuracy. Nevertheless, the original KGP framework necessitates costly fine-tuning with large datasets yet still suffers from LLM hallucination. Therefore, we propose a reasoning-infused LLM agent to enhance this framework. This agent mimics human curiosity to ask follow-up questions to more efficiently navigate the search. This simple modification significantly boosts the LLM performance in QA tasks without the high costs and latency associated with the initial KGP framework. Our ultimate goal is to further develop this approach, leading to more accurate, faster, and cost-effective solutions in the QA domain.
4/16/2024
Reasoning on Efficient Knowledge Paths:Knowledge Graph Guides Large Language Model for Domain Question Answering
Yuqi Wang, Boran Jiang, Yi Luo, Dawei He, Peng Cheng, Liangcai Gao
0
0
Large language models (LLMs), such as GPT3.5, GPT4 and LLAMA2 perform surprisingly well and outperform human experts on many tasks. However, in many domain-specific evaluations, these LLMs often suffer from hallucination problems due to insufficient training of relevant corpus. Furthermore, fine-tuning large models may face problems such as the LLMs are not open source or the construction of high-quality domain instruction is difficult. Therefore, structured knowledge databases such as knowledge graph can better provide domain back- ground knowledge for LLMs and make full use of the reasoning and analysis capabilities of LLMs. In some previous works, LLM was called multiple times to determine whether the current triplet was suitable for inclusion in the subgraph when retrieving subgraphs through a question. Especially for the question that require a multi-hop reasoning path, frequent calls to LLM will consume a lot of computing power. Moreover, when choosing the reasoning path, LLM will be called once for each step, and if one of the steps is selected incorrectly, it will lead to the accumulation of errors in the following steps. In this paper, we integrated and optimized a pipeline for selecting reasoning paths from KG based on LLM, which can reduce the dependency on LLM. In addition, we propose a simple and effective subgraph retrieval method based on chain of thought (CoT) and page rank which can returns the paths most likely to contain the answer. We conduct experiments on three datasets: GenMedGPT-5k [14], WebQuestions [2], and CMCQA [21]. Finally, RoK can demonstrate that using fewer LLM calls can achieve the same results as previous SOTAs models.
4/17/2024
💬
Logic Query of Thoughts: Guiding Large Language Models to Answer Complex Logic Queries with Knowledge Graphs
Lihui Liu, Zihao Wang, Ruizhong Qiu, Yikun Ban, Eunice Chan, Yangqiu Song, Jingrui He, Hanghang Tong
0
0
Despite the superb performance in many tasks, large language models (LLMs) bear the risk of generating hallucination or even wrong answers when confronted with tasks that demand the accuracy of knowledge. The issue becomes even more noticeable when addressing logic queries that require multiple logic reasoning steps. On the other hand, knowledge graph (KG) based question answering methods are capable of accurately identifying the correct answers with the help of knowledge graph, yet its accuracy could quickly deteriorate when the knowledge graph itself is sparse and incomplete. It remains a critical challenge on how to integrate knowledge graph reasoning with LLMs in a mutually beneficial way so as to mitigate both the hallucination problem of LLMs as well as the incompleteness issue of knowledge graphs. In this paper, we propose 'Logic-Query-of-Thoughts' (LGOT) which is the first of its kind to combine LLMs with knowledge graph based logic query reasoning. LGOT seamlessly combines knowledge graph reasoning and LLMs, effectively breaking down complex logic queries into easy to answer subquestions. Through the utilization of both knowledge graph reasoning and LLMs, it successfully derives answers for each subquestion. By aggregating these results and selecting the highest quality candidate answers for each step, LGOT achieves accurate results to complex questions. Our experimental findings demonstrate substantial performance enhancements, with up to 20% improvement over ChatGPT.
4/16/2024
Counter-intuitive: Large Language Models Can Better Understand Knowledge Graphs Than We Thought
Xinbang Dai, Yuncheng Hua, Tongtong Wu, Yang Sheng, Qiu Ji, Guilin Qi
0
0
As the parameter scale of large language models (LLMs) grows, jointly training knowledge graph (KG) embeddings with model parameters to enhance LLM capabilities becomes increasingly costly. Consequently, the community has shown interest in developing prompt strategies that effectively integrate KG information into LLMs. However, the format for incorporating KGs into LLMs lacks standardization; for instance, KGs can be transformed into linearized triples or natural language (NL) text. Current prompting methods often rely on a trial-and-error approach, leaving researchers with an incomplete understanding of which KG input format best facilitates LLM comprehension of KG content. To elucidate this, we design a series of experiments to explore LLMs' understanding of different KG input formats within the context of prompt engineering. Our analysis examines both literal and attention distribution levels. Through extensive experiments, we indicate a counter-intuitive phenomenon: when addressing fact-related questions, unordered linearized triples are more effective for LLMs' understanding of KGs compared to fluent NL text. Furthermore, noisy, incomplete, or marginally relevant subgraphs can still enhance LLM performance. Finally, different LLMs have distinct preferences for different formats of organizing unordered triples.
6/18/2024