An invitation to the sample complexity of quantum hypothesis testing
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Investigates the sample complexity of quantum hypothesis testing
- Analyzes the minimum number of samples required to distinguish between two quantum states with a given error probability
- Provides lower bounds on the sample complexity for different classes of quantum states
Plain English Explanation
This research paper explores a fundamental question in quantum computing: how many measurements or "samples" are needed to reliably distinguish between two quantum states? This is an important problem in quantum hypothesis testing, where the goal is to determine which of two possible quantum states a system is in.
The researchers derive mathematical lower bounds on the sample complexity - the minimum number of samples required - for different classes of quantum states. This gives us a better understanding of the inherent difficulty of quantum hypothesis testing problems and the resources needed to solve them.
For example, the paper shows that for certifying almost all quantum states with few single-qubit measurements, the sample complexity can be much lower than for general quantum states. This highlights how the structure of the quantum states can significantly impact the difficulty of the testing problem.
Understanding these sample complexity bounds is crucial for the design and analysis of practical quantum algorithms, as it tells us the minimum number of measurements required to reliably distinguish between quantum states. This has important implications for applications like quantum machine learning and the estimation of properties of quantum systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper formally defines the quantum hypothesis testing problem and introduces key information-theoretic quantities, such as the quantum Chernoff bound and the quantum relative entropy, that characterize the distinguishability of quantum states.
Using these concepts, the researchers derive lower bounds on the sample complexity for several classes of quantum states:
- General quantum states: The sample complexity is lower bounded by a term involving the quantum relative entropy between the two states.
- Pure states: For distinguishing between pure quantum states, the sample complexity is lower bounded by a term involving the angle between the state vectors.
- Quantum Gaussian states: For Gaussian quantum states, the sample complexity is lower bounded by a term involving the statistical complexity of the underlying classical Gaussian distributions.
These lower bounds provide fundamental limits on the efficiency of quantum hypothesis testing and have implications for the statistical complexity of quantum learning and the complexity of estimating partition functions in quantum systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous mathematical analysis of the sample complexity in quantum hypothesis testing, building on well-established information-theoretic concepts. The derived lower bounds are tight in the sense that matching upper bounds can be achieved in certain cases.
However, the analysis is mostly focused on the asymptotic regime, i.e., the behavior of the sample complexity as the error probability goes to zero. The paper does not extensively discuss the finite-sample performance or the practical implications of the derived bounds.
Additionally, the paper assumes that the quantum states are known a priori, which may not always be the case in realistic scenarios. Extending the analysis to the case of unknown quantum states could be an interesting direction for future research.
Conclusion
This research paper provides fundamental insights into the sample complexity of quantum hypothesis testing, which is a crucial problem in the field of quantum information science. The derived lower bounds on the minimum number of samples required to reliably distinguish between quantum states have important implications for the design and analysis of quantum algorithms, as well as for our understanding of the inherent complexity of quantum systems.
By characterizing the sample complexity in terms of information-theoretic quantities, the paper advances our theoretical understanding of the resources needed for quantum state discrimination and offers a new perspective on the estimation of properties of quantum systems and the statistical complexity of quantum learning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
An invitation to the sample complexity of quantum hypothesis testing
Hao-Chung Cheng, Nilanjana Datta, Nana Liu, Theshani Nuradha, Robert Salzmann, Mark M. Wilde
Quantum hypothesis testing (QHT) has been traditionally studied from the information-theoretic perspective, wherein one is interested in the optimal decay rate of error probabilities as a function of the number of samples of an unknown state. In this paper, we study the sample complexity of QHT, wherein the goal is to determine the minimum number of samples needed to reach a desired error probability. By making use of the wealth of knowledge that already exists in the literature on QHT, we characterize the sample complexity of binary QHT in the symmetric and asymmetric settings, and we provide bounds on the sample complexity of multiple QHT. In more detail, we prove that the sample complexity of symmetric binary QHT depends logarithmically on the inverse error probability and inversely on the negative logarithm of the fidelity. As a counterpart of the quantum Stein's lemma, we also find that the sample complexity of asymmetric binary QHT depends logarithmically on the inverse type II error probability and inversely on the quantum relative entropy, provided that the type II error probability is sufficiently small. We then provide lower and upper bounds on the sample complexity of multiple QHT, with it remaining an intriguing open question to improve these bounds. The final part of our paper outlines and reviews how sample complexity of QHT is relevant to a broad swathe of research areas and can enhance understanding of many fundamental concepts, including quantum algorithms for simulation and search, quantum learning and classification, and foundations of quantum mechanics. As such, we view our paper as an invitation to researchers coming from different communities to study and contribute to the problem of sample complexity of QHT, and we outline a number of open directions for future research.
Read more5/17/2024
0
New Bounds on Quantum Sample Complexity of Measurement Classes
Mohsen Heidari, Wojciech Szpankowski
This paper studies quantum supervised learning for classical inference from quantum states. In this model, a learner has access to a set of labeled quantum samples as the training set. The objective is to find a quantum measurement that predicts the label of the unseen samples. The hardness of learning is measured via sample complexity under a quantum counterpart of the well-known probably approximately correct (PAC). Quantum sample complexity is expected to be higher than classical one, because of the measurement incompatibility and state collapse. Recent efforts showed that the sample complexity of learning a finite quantum concept class $mathcal{C}$ scales as $O(|mathcal{C}|)$. This is significantly higher than the classical sample complexity that grows logarithmically with the class size. This work improves the sample complexity bound to $O(V_{mathcal{C}^*} log |mathcal{C}^*|)$, where $mathcal{C}^*$ is the set of extreme points of the convex closure of $mathcal{C}$ and $V_{mathcal{C}^*}$ is the shadow-norm of this set. We show the tightness of our bound for the class of bounded Hilbert-Schmidt norm, scaling as $O(log |mathcal{C}^*|)$. Our approach is based on a new quantum empirical risk minimization (ERM) algorithm equipped with a shadow tomography method.
Read more8/26/2024
📉
0
A simple lower bound for the complexity of estimating partition functions on a quantum computer
Zherui Chen, Giacomo Nannicini
We study the complexity of estimating the partition function ${mathsf{Z}}(beta)=sum_{xinchi} e^{-beta H(x)}$ for a Gibbs distribution characterized by the Hamiltonian $H(x)$. We provide a simple and natural lower bound for quantum algorithms that solve this task by relying on reflections through the coherent encoding of Gibbs states. Our primary contribution is a $Omega(1/epsilon)$ lower bound for the number of reflections needed to estimate the partition function with a quantum algorithm. We also prove a $Omega(1/epsilon^2)$ query lower bound for classical algorithms. The proofs are based on a reduction from the problem of estimating the Hamming weight of an unknown binary string.
Read more4/4/2024
🐍
0
Certifying almost all quantum states with few single-qubit measurements
Hsin-Yuan Huang, John Preskill, Mehdi Soleimanifar
Certifying that an n-qubit state synthesized in the lab is close to the target state is a fundamental task in quantum information science. However, existing rigorous protocols either require deep quantum circuits or exponentially many single-qubit measurements. In this work, we prove that almost all n-qubit target states, including those with exponential circuit complexity, can be certified from only O(n^2) single-qubit measurements. This result is established by a new technique that relates certification to the mixing time of a random walk. Our protocol has applications for benchmarking quantum systems, for optimizing quantum circuits to generate a desired target state, and for learning and verifying neural networks, tensor networks, and various other representations of quantum states using only single-qubit measurements. We show that such verified representations can be used to efficiently predict highly non-local properties that would otherwise require an exponential number of measurements. We demonstrate these applications in numerical experiments with up to 120 qubits, and observe advantage over existing methods such as cross-entropy benchmarking (XEB).
Read more4/12/2024