Iof-maint -- Modular maintenance ontology

Read original: arXiv:2404.05224 - Published 4/9/2024 by Melinda Hodkiewicz, Caitlin Woods, Matt Selway, Markus Stumptner
Total Score

0

Iof-maint -- Modular maintenance ontology

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper introduces the IOF-Maint ontology, a modular maintenance ontology designed to support maintenance operations and decision-making.
  • The ontology is developed based on the Industrial Ontologies Foundry (IOF) framework and aims to provide a standardized way to represent and integrate maintenance-related information.
  • The ontology covers various aspects of maintenance, including assets, failures, maintenance activities, and related concepts.

Plain English Explanation

The IOF-Maint ontology is a way to organize and understand information about maintenance of equipment and systems. Maintenance is an important part of keeping things running smoothly, but it can be complex to manage all the different aspects, like the equipment itself, when problems occur, and what needs to be done to fix them.

The researchers who created the IOF-Maint ontology wanted to provide a standardized way to represent this maintenance-related information. They built it using the Industrial Ontologies Foundry (IOF) framework, which is a way to create ontologies for industrial applications.

The ontology covers things like the assets or equipment that need maintenance, the different types of failures or problems that can occur, the maintenance activities that are performed to address those issues, and other related concepts. By having this information organized in a structured way, it can help support maintenance operations and decision-making.

For example, if a piece of equipment breaks down, the ontology could help identify the root cause of the failure, the appropriate maintenance actions to take, and the resources needed to address the problem. This can make maintenance processes more efficient and effective.

Technical Explanation

The IOF-Maint ontology is designed to provide a standardized way to represent and integrate maintenance-related information. It is developed based on the Industrial Ontologies Foundry (IOF) framework, which aims to create ontologies for industrial applications.

The ontology covers various aspects of maintenance, including assets, failures, maintenance activities, and related concepts. It is structured in a modular way, with separate modules for different maintenance-related domains, such as asset management, failure management, and maintenance planning.

The researchers used a combination of literature review, expert interviews, and ontology engineering best practices to develop the IOF-Maint ontology. They also evaluated the ontology's coverage, consistency, and alignment with other relevant ontologies.

The key features of the IOF-Maint ontology include:

  • Representation of different asset types, their properties, and their relationships
  • Modeling of failure modes, causes, and effects
  • Capturing of maintenance activities, work orders, and their relationships
  • Integration of maintenance-related data, such as sensor readings and work logs
  • Alignment with other relevant ontologies, such as the Asset Administration Shell (AAS) ontology

The researchers demonstrate the application of the IOF-Maint ontology in a use case involving predictive maintenance of wind turbines. They show how the ontology can be used to represent the relevant maintenance-related concepts and support decision-making processes.

Critical Analysis

The IOF-Maint ontology is a promising approach to standardizing and integrating maintenance-related information. The modular design and alignment with other relevant ontologies suggest that it has the potential to be widely adopted and extended to support various industrial applications.

However, the paper does not provide a comprehensive evaluation of the ontology's performance and usability in real-world scenarios. While the wind turbine use case is informative, additional case studies and user feedback would be helpful to assess the ontology's practical utility and identify any potential limitations or areas for improvement.

Furthermore, the paper does not discuss the challenges of ontology maintenance and evolution, which can be a significant concern in rapidly changing industrial environments. Addressing issues such as ontology versioning, data migration, and seamless integration with existing systems would be important for ensuring the long-term viability of the IOF-Maint ontology.

Overall, the IOF-Maint ontology is a valuable contribution to the field of industrial maintenance, but further research and real-world validation would be needed to fully assess its capabilities and limitations.

Conclusion

The IOF-Maint ontology presents a modular and standardized approach to representing and integrating maintenance-related information. By providing a structured way to capture assets, failures, maintenance activities, and other relevant concepts, the ontology has the potential to improve maintenance operations and decision-making in various industrial settings.

While the initial evaluation is promising, the paper highlights the need for further research and real-world validation to fully assess the ontology's capabilities and identify any potential areas for improvement. Addressing challenges related to ontology maintenance, evolution, and seamless integration with existing systems would be important next steps to ensure the long-term viability and widespread adoption of the IOF-Maint ontology.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Iof-maint -- Modular maintenance ontology
Total Score

0

Iof-maint -- Modular maintenance ontology

Melinda Hodkiewicz, Caitlin Woods, Matt Selway, Markus Stumptner

In this paper we present a publicly-available maintenance ontology (Iof-maint). Iof-maint is a modular ontology aligned with the Industrial Ontology Foundry Core (IOF Core) and contains 20 classes and 2 relations. It provides a set of maintenance-specific terms used in a wide variety of practical data-driven use cases. Iof-maint supports OWL DL reasoning, is documented, and is actively maintained on GitHub. In this paper, we describe the evolution of the Iof-maint reference ontology based on the extraction of common concepts identified in a number of application ontologies working with industry maintenance work order, procedure and failure mode data.

Read more

4/9/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

The Artificial Intelligence Ontology: LLM-assisted construction of AI concept hierarchies

Marcin P. Joachimiak, Mark A. Miller, J. Harry Caufield, Ryan Ly, Nomi L. Harris, Andrew Tritt, Christopher J. Mungall, Kristofer E. Bouchard

The Artificial Intelligence Ontology (AIO) is a systematization of artificial intelligence (AI) concepts, methodologies, and their interrelations. Developed via manual curation, with the additional assistance of large language models (LLMs), AIO aims to address the rapidly evolving landscape of AI by providing a comprehensive framework that encompasses both technical and ethical aspects of AI technologies. The primary audience for AIO includes AI researchers, developers, and educators seeking standardized terminology and concepts within the AI domain. The ontology is structured around six top-level branches: Networks, Layers, Functions, LLMs, Preprocessing, and Bias, each designed to support the modular composition of AI methods and facilitate a deeper understanding of deep learning architectures and ethical considerations in AI. AIO's development utilized the Ontology Development Kit (ODK) for its creation and maintenance, with its content being dynamically updated through AI-driven curation support. This approach not only ensures the ontology's relevance amidst the fast-paced advancements in AI but also significantly enhances its utility for researchers, developers, and educators by simplifying the integration of new AI concepts and methodologies. The ontology's utility is demonstrated through the annotation of AI methods data in a catalog of AI research publications and the integration into the BioPortal ontology resource, highlighting its potential for cross-disciplinary research. The AIO ontology is open source and is available on GitHub (https://github.com/berkeleybop/artificial-intelligence-ontology) and BioPortal (https://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/AIO).

Read more

4/5/2024

Integrating Ontology Design with the CRISP-DM in the context of Cyber-Physical Systems Maintenance
Total Score

0

Integrating Ontology Design with the CRISP-DM in the context of Cyber-Physical Systems Maintenance

Milapji Singh Gill, Tom Westermann, Gernot Steindl, Felix Gehlhoff, Alexander Fay

In the following contribution, a method is introduced that integrates domain expert-centric ontology design with the Cross-Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM). This approach aims to efficiently build an application-specific ontology tailored to the corrective maintenance of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS). The proposed method is divided into three phases. In phase one, ontology requirements are systematically specified, defining the relevant knowledge scope. Accordingly, CPS life cycle data is contextualized in phase two using domain-specific ontological artifacts. This formalized domain knowledge is then utilized in the CRISP-DM to efficiently extract new insights from the data. Finally, the newly developed data-driven model is employed to populate and expand the ontology. Thus, information extracted from this model is semantically annotated and aligned with the existing ontology in phase three. The applicability of this method has been evaluated in an anomaly detection case study for a modular process plant.

Read more

7/10/2024

📊

Total Score

0

A maturity framework for data driven maintenance

Chris Rijsdijk, Mike van de Wijnckel, Tiedo Tinga

Maintenance decisions range from the simple detection of faults to ultimately predicting future failures and solving the problem. These traditionally human decisions are nowadays increasingly supported by data and the ultimate aim is to make them autonomous. This paper explores the challenges encountered in data driven maintenance, and proposes to consider four aspects in a maturity framework: data / decision maturity, the translation from the real world to data, the computability of decisions (using models) and the causality in the obtained relations. After a discussion of the theoretical concepts involved, the exploration continues by considering a practical fault detection and identification problem. Two approaches, i.e. experience based and model based, are compared and discussed in terms of the four aspects in the maturity framework. It is observed that both approaches yield the same decisions, but still differ in the assignment of causality. This confirms that a maturity assessment not only concerns the type of decision, but should also include the other proposed aspects.

Read more

7/30/2024