Is Value Functions Estimation with Classification Plug-and-play for Offline Reinforcement Learning?

Read original: arXiv:2406.06309 - Published 6/11/2024 by Denis Tarasov, Kirill Brilliantov, Dmitrii Kharlapenko

🏷️

Overview

The paper investigates an alternative approach to approximating value functions in deep reinforcement learning (RL) using a cross-entropy classification objective instead of the traditional mean squared error (MSE) regression.
The authors aim to empirically study the impact of this change in an offline RL setup and analyze the effects of different aspects on performance.
Through large-scale experiments across a diverse range of tasks and algorithms, the authors seek to gain deeper insights into the implications of this approach.

Plain English Explanation

In deep reinforcement learning, the computer programs that learn to make decisions are typically built using deep neural networks. These networks are trained to estimate the expected future rewards, known as the value function, by minimizing the mean squared error (MSE) between the predicted and true values.

Recent research has proposed an alternative approach that uses a cross-entropy classification objective instead of MSE regression. This classification-based method has shown improved performance and scalability of RL algorithms in some cases. However, the existing studies have not extensively tested this replacement across various domains.

The authors of this paper wanted to take a closer look at how well this classification-based approach works in an offline RL setup, where the computer program learns from pre-recorded data rather than interacting with the environment in real-time. They ran a large number of experiments using different RL algorithms and tasks to better understand the implications of this change.

Their results reveal that for some algorithms and tasks, the classification-based approach can lead to better performance than the traditional MSE-based methods. However, for other algorithms, this modification might result in a significant drop in performance. These findings are important for researchers and practitioners who are considering applying this classification-based approach in their work.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates the impact of replacing the typical mean squared error (MSE) regression objective with a cross-entropy classification objective for approximating value functions in deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms. This alternative approach has been proposed in recent research, such as UDQL, Exclusively Penalized Q-Learning, Diverse Randomized Value Functions, Tensor-Matrix Low-Rank Value Function Approximation, and Model Predictive Control-based Value Estimation, which have demonstrated improved performance and scalability of RL algorithms.

The authors conduct a large-scale empirical investigation to study the effects of this change in an offline RL setup, where the agent learns from pre-collected data instead of interacting with the environment in real-time. They evaluate the performance of different RL algorithms, such as Q-learning and policy gradient methods, across a diverse range of tasks to gain deeper insights into the implications of this approach.

The results show that incorporating the classification-based objective can lead to superior performance over state-of-the-art solutions for some algorithms in certain tasks, while maintaining comparable performance levels in other tasks. However, for other algorithms, this modification might result in a dramatic performance drop. These findings are crucial for researchers and practitioners who are considering applying the classification-based approach in their work, as they highlight the need for a careful evaluation of the trade-offs and the specific algorithm-task combinations where this approach may be beneficial.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive empirical investigation of the impact of using a cross-entropy classification objective instead of MSE regression for value function approximation in deep RL. The authors' decision to focus on an offline RL setup is particularly relevant, as this setting is becoming increasingly important in practical applications where data collection can be expensive or dangerous.

One potential limitation of the study is that it does not delve deeply into the underlying reasons for the observed performance differences between the two approaches. While the authors provide some high-level insights, a more detailed analysis of the factors contributing to the observed effects, such as the specific characteristics of the tasks and algorithms, could offer additional valuable insights.

Additionally, the paper does not discuss the potential computational and training efficiency implications of the classification-based approach compared to the traditional MSE regression. This information could be helpful for researchers and practitioners in weighing the trade-offs when deciding which approach to use in their specific applications.

Overall, the paper's findings are an important contribution to the field of deep RL, as they highlight the need for a careful evaluation of the performance implications when replacing the value function approximation objective. The authors' recommendation for further research and practical application of the classification-based approach is well-justified, as the results suggest that the benefits may be task and algorithm-dependent.

Conclusion

This paper presents a comprehensive empirical investigation into the impact of replacing the traditional mean squared error (MSE) regression objective with a cross-entropy classification objective for value function approximation in deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms. Through large-scale experiments across a diverse range of tasks and RL algorithms, the authors demonstrate that this alternative approach can lead to superior performance in some cases, while causing a dramatic drop in performance for other algorithms.

These findings are crucial for researchers and practitioners who are considering applying the classification-based approach in their work, as they highlight the need for a careful evaluation of the trade-offs and the specific algorithm-task combinations where this approach may be beneficial. The authors' recommendations for further research and practical application of the classification-based approach are well-justified, as the results suggest that the implications of this change can be highly dependent on the specific context.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🏷️

Is Value Functions Estimation with Classification Plug-and-play for Offline Reinforcement Learning?

Denis Tarasov, Kirill Brilliantov, Dmitrii Kharlapenko

In deep Reinforcement Learning (RL), value functions are typically approximated using deep neural networks and trained via mean squared error regression objectives to fit the true value functions. Recent research has proposed an alternative approach, utilizing the cross-entropy classification objective, which has demonstrated improved performance and scalability of RL algorithms. However, existing study have not extensively benchmarked the effects of this replacement across various domains, as the primary objective was to demonstrate the efficacy of the concept across a broad spectrum of tasks, without delving into in-depth analysis. Our work seeks to empirically investigate the impact of such a replacement in an offline RL setup and analyze the effects of different aspects on performance. Through large-scale experiments conducted across a diverse range of tasks using different algorithms, we aim to gain deeper insights into the implications of this approach. Our results reveal that incorporating this change can lead to superior performance over state-of-the-art solutions for some algorithms in certain tasks, while maintaining comparable performance levels in other tasks, however for other algorithms this modification might lead to the dramatic performance drop. This findings are crucial for further application of classification approach in research and practical tasks.

6/11/2024

Is Value Learning Really the Main Bottleneck in Offline RL?

Seohong Park, Kevin Frans, Sergey Levine, Aviral Kumar

While imitation learning requires access to high-quality data, offline reinforcement learning (RL) should, in principle, perform similarly or better with substantially lower data quality by using a value function. However, current results indicate that offline RL often performs worse than imitation learning, and it is often unclear what holds back the performance of offline RL. Motivated by this observation, we aim to understand the bottlenecks in current offline RL algorithms. While poor performance of offline RL is typically attributed to an imperfect value function, we ask: is the main bottleneck of offline RL indeed in learning the value function, or something else? To answer this question, we perform a systematic empirical study of (1) value learning, (2) policy extraction, and (3) policy generalization in offline RL problems, analyzing how these components affect performance. We make two surprising observations. First, we find that the choice of a policy extraction algorithm significantly affects the performance and scalability of offline RL, often more so than the value learning objective. For instance, we show that common value-weighted behavioral cloning objectives (e.g., AWR) do not fully leverage the learned value function, and switching to behavior-constrained policy gradient objectives (e.g., DDPG+BC) often leads to substantial improvements in performance and scalability. Second, we find that a big barrier to improving offline RL performance is often imperfect policy generalization on test-time states out of the support of the training data, rather than policy learning on in-distribution states. We then show that the use of suboptimal but high-coverage data or test-time policy training techniques can address this generalization issue in practice. Specifically, we propose two simple test-time policy improvement methods and show that these methods lead to better performance.

6/14/2024

🏅

UDQL: Bridging The Gap between MSE Loss and The Optimal Value Function in Offline Reinforcement Learning

Yu Zhang, Rui Yu, Zhipeng Yao, Wenyuan Zhang, Jun Wang, Liming Zhang

The Mean Square Error (MSE) is commonly utilized to estimate the solution of the optimal value function in the vast majority of offline reinforcement learning (RL) models and has achieved outstanding performance. However, we find that its principle can lead to overestimation phenomenon for the value function. In this paper, we first theoretically analyze overestimation phenomenon led by MSE and provide the theoretical upper bound of the overestimated error. Furthermore, to address it, we propose a novel Bellman underestimated operator to counteract overestimation phenomenon and then prove its contraction characteristics. At last, we propose the offline RL algorithm based on underestimated operator and diffusion policy model. Extensive experimental results on D4RL tasks show that our method can outperform state-of-the-art offline RL algorithms, which demonstrates that our theoretical analysis and underestimation way are effective for offline RL tasks.

6/6/2024

Diverse Randomized Value Functions: A Provably Pessimistic Approach for Offline Reinforcement Learning

Xudong Yu, Chenjia Bai, Hongyi Guo, Changhong Wang, Zhen Wang

Offline Reinforcement Learning (RL) faces distributional shift and unreliable value estimation, especially for out-of-distribution (OOD) actions. To address this, existing uncertainty-based methods penalize the value function with uncertainty quantification and demand numerous ensemble networks, posing computational challenges and suboptimal outcomes. In this paper, we introduce a novel strategy employing diverse randomized value functions to estimate the posterior distribution of $Q$-values. It provides robust uncertainty quantification and estimates lower confidence bounds (LCB) of $Q$-values. By applying moderate value penalties for OOD actions, our method fosters a provably pessimistic approach. We also emphasize on diversity within randomized value functions and enhance efficiency by introducing a diversity regularization method, reducing the requisite number of networks. These modules lead to reliable value estimation and efficient policy learning from offline data. Theoretical analysis shows that our method recovers the provably efficient LCB-penalty under linear MDP assumptions. Extensive empirical results also demonstrate that our proposed method significantly outperforms baseline methods in terms of performance and parametric efficiency.

4/10/2024