Exclusively Penalized Q-learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning

Read original: arXiv:2405.14082 - Published 5/24/2024 by Junghyuk Yeom, Yonghyeon Jo, Jungmo Kim, Sanghyeon Lee, Seungyul Han
Total Score

0

🏅

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper focuses on a limitation in existing offline reinforcement learning (RL) methods with penalized value functions, indicating the potential for underestimation bias due to unnecessary bias introduced in the value function.
  • To address this concern, the authors propose a new method called Exclusively Penalized Q-learning (EPQ), which reduces estimation bias in the value function by selectively penalizing states that are prone to inducing estimation errors.
  • The numerical results show that the EPQ method significantly reduces underestimation bias and improves performance in various offline control tasks compared to other offline RL methods.

Plain English Explanation

Reinforcement learning (RL) is a type of machine learning where an agent learns to make decisions by interacting with an environment and receiving rewards or penalties. In offline RL, the agent learns from a fixed dataset of past experiences, rather than actively exploring the environment.

One challenge in offline RL is the potential for overestimation errors, which can occur when the agent's value function (a measure of the expected future rewards) is affected by the distribution of the training data being different from the real-world distribution. To address this, some existing offline RL methods use policy constraints or penalize the value function.

However, the authors of this paper found that these methods can potentially lead to a different problem - underestimation bias. This means the agent's value function may be underestimating the true value of certain states, which could lead to suboptimal decision-making.

To address this, the researchers propose a new method called Exclusively Penalized Q-learning (EPQ). This method selectively penalizes only the states that are prone to causing estimation errors, rather than applying penalties across the board. This helps reduce the underestimation bias and improve the agent's performance on offline control tasks, as shown by the numerical results.

Technical Explanation

The paper starts by discussing the limitations of existing offline RL methods that use penalized value functions to mitigate overestimation errors caused by distributional shift. The authors argue that these methods can inadvertently introduce unnecessary bias into the value function, leading to underestimation bias.

To address this, the researchers propose the Exclusively Penalized Q-learning (EPQ) algorithm. EPQ selectively applies penalties to the value function, targeting only the states that are prone to inducing estimation errors. This is done by estimating the uncertainty of the value function for each state and applying penalties proportional to this uncertainty.

The authors evaluate EPQ on various offline control tasks and compare its performance to other offline RL methods, such as BRAC, BEAR, and CQL. The results show that EPQ significantly reduces underestimation bias and outperforms the other methods in terms of task performance.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable contribution by identifying and addressing the potential for underestimation bias in existing offline RL methods with penalized value functions. The authors' proposed EPQ algorithm appears to be a promising solution, as demonstrated by the numerical results.

However, the paper does not explore the limitations or potential issues of the EPQ method in depth. For example, it would be helpful to understand the computational overhead of estimating the uncertainty of the value function for each state, and how this might affect the scalability of the approach.

Additionally, the paper focuses on offline control tasks, but it would be interesting to see how the EPQ method performs in other offline RL scenarios, such as offline reinforcement learning on imbalanced datasets or model-based offline RL. Exploring these areas could provide further insights into the strengths and limitations of the EPQ method.

Conclusion

This paper highlights an important limitation in existing offline RL methods that use penalized value functions, identifying the potential for underestimation bias. The authors' proposed Exclusively Penalized Q-learning (EPQ) algorithm addresses this issue by selectively applying penalties to the value function, targeting only the states that are prone to causing estimation errors.

The numerical results demonstrate that EPQ can significantly reduce underestimation bias and improve performance in offline control tasks, compared to other offline RL methods. This work advances the understanding of the challenges in offline RL and provides a practical solution to mitigate the underestimation bias problem.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🏅

Total Score

0

Exclusively Penalized Q-learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning

Junghyuk Yeom, Yonghyeon Jo, Jungmo Kim, Sanghyeon Lee, Seungyul Han

Constraint-based offline reinforcement learning (RL) involves policy constraints or imposing penalties on the value function to mitigate overestimation errors caused by distributional shift. This paper focuses on a limitation in existing offline RL methods with penalized value function, indicating the potential for underestimation bias due to unnecessary bias introduced in the value function. To address this concern, we propose Exclusively Penalized Q-learning (EPQ), which reduces estimation bias in the value function by selectively penalizing states that are prone to inducing estimation errors. Numerical results show that our method significantly reduces underestimation bias and improves performance in various offline control tasks compared to other offline RL methods

Read more

5/24/2024

Strategically Conservative Q-Learning
Total Score

0

Strategically Conservative Q-Learning

Yutaka Shimizu, Joey Hong, Sergey Levine, Masayoshi Tomizuka

Offline reinforcement learning (RL) is a compelling paradigm to extend RL's practical utility by leveraging pre-collected, static datasets, thereby avoiding the limitations associated with collecting online interactions. The major difficulty in offline RL is mitigating the impact of approximation errors when encountering out-of-distribution (OOD) actions; doing so ineffectively will lead to policies that prefer OOD actions, which can lead to unexpected and potentially catastrophic results. Despite the variety of works proposed to address this issue, they tend to excessively suppress the value function in and around OOD regions, resulting in overly pessimistic value estimates. In this paper, we propose a novel framework called Strategically Conservative Q-Learning (SCQ) that distinguishes between OOD data that is easy and hard to estimate, ultimately resulting in less conservative value estimates. Our approach exploits the inherent strengths of neural networks to interpolate, while carefully navigating their limitations in extrapolation, to obtain pessimistic yet still property calibrated value estimates. Theoretical analysis also shows that the value function learned by SCQ is still conservative, but potentially much less so than that of Conservative Q-learning (CQL). Finally, extensive evaluation on the D4RL benchmark tasks shows our proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art methods. Our code is available through url{https://github.com/purewater0901/SCQ}.

Read more

6/10/2024

Diverse Randomized Value Functions: A Provably Pessimistic Approach for Offline Reinforcement Learning
Total Score

0

Diverse Randomized Value Functions: A Provably Pessimistic Approach for Offline Reinforcement Learning

Xudong Yu, Chenjia Bai, Hongyi Guo, Changhong Wang, Zhen Wang

Offline Reinforcement Learning (RL) faces distributional shift and unreliable value estimation, especially for out-of-distribution (OOD) actions. To address this, existing uncertainty-based methods penalize the value function with uncertainty quantification and demand numerous ensemble networks, posing computational challenges and suboptimal outcomes. In this paper, we introduce a novel strategy employing diverse randomized value functions to estimate the posterior distribution of $Q$-values. It provides robust uncertainty quantification and estimates lower confidence bounds (LCB) of $Q$-values. By applying moderate value penalties for OOD actions, our method fosters a provably pessimistic approach. We also emphasize on diversity within randomized value functions and enhance efficiency by introducing a diversity regularization method, reducing the requisite number of networks. These modules lead to reliable value estimation and efficient policy learning from offline data. Theoretical analysis shows that our method recovers the provably efficient LCB-penalty under linear MDP assumptions. Extensive empirical results also demonstrate that our proposed method significantly outperforms baseline methods in terms of performance and parametric efficiency.

Read more

4/10/2024

Is Value Learning Really the Main Bottleneck in Offline RL?
Total Score

0

Is Value Learning Really the Main Bottleneck in Offline RL?

Seohong Park, Kevin Frans, Sergey Levine, Aviral Kumar

While imitation learning requires access to high-quality data, offline reinforcement learning (RL) should, in principle, perform similarly or better with substantially lower data quality by using a value function. However, current results indicate that offline RL often performs worse than imitation learning, and it is often unclear what holds back the performance of offline RL. Motivated by this observation, we aim to understand the bottlenecks in current offline RL algorithms. While poor performance of offline RL is typically attributed to an imperfect value function, we ask: is the main bottleneck of offline RL indeed in learning the value function, or something else? To answer this question, we perform a systematic empirical study of (1) value learning, (2) policy extraction, and (3) policy generalization in offline RL problems, analyzing how these components affect performance. We make two surprising observations. First, we find that the choice of a policy extraction algorithm significantly affects the performance and scalability of offline RL, often more so than the value learning objective. For instance, we show that common value-weighted behavioral cloning objectives (e.g., AWR) do not fully leverage the learned value function, and switching to behavior-constrained policy gradient objectives (e.g., DDPG+BC) often leads to substantial improvements in performance and scalability. Second, we find that a big barrier to improving offline RL performance is often imperfect policy generalization on test-time states out of the support of the training data, rather than policy learning on in-distribution states. We then show that the use of suboptimal but high-coverage data or test-time policy training techniques can address this generalization issue in practice. Specifically, we propose two simple test-time policy improvement methods and show that these methods lead to better performance.

Read more

6/14/2024