Joint or Disjoint: Mixing Training Regimes for Early-Exit Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores different training regimes for early-exit models, which are neural networks that can stop inference at multiple points to save computation.
- The authors investigate whether it's better to train the early-exit branches jointly or separately (disjointly) from the main model.
- They conduct experiments on various vision and language tasks to understand the trade-offs between these two training approaches.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at a type of neural network called an "early-exit model." These models can stop making predictions at different points during the inference process, which can save a lot of computation time. The key question the authors explore is whether it's better to train the different exit points [object Object] or [object Object] from the main model.
Training the exits jointly means the whole model is trained together, while training disjointly means the exits are trained independently. The authors test these two approaches across several [object Object] and [object Object] tasks to see which one performs better. They look at factors like accuracy, inference time, and the overall efficiency of the models.
The key finding is that there's no one-size-fits-all answer - the best approach depends on the specific task and dataset. In some cases, joint training works better, while in others, disjoint training is preferable. The paper provides guidance on when to use each approach based on the characteristics of the problem at hand.
Technical Explanation
The authors explore two main training regimes for early-exit models:
- Joint Training: The entire model, including the main branch and all early-exit branches, is trained together in an end-to-end fashion.
- Disjoint Training: The main model is first trained, then the early-exit branches are trained separately, either from scratch or by fine-tuning the main model.
They conduct experiments on various vision and language tasks, including image classification, object detection, and natural language inference. The models are evaluated on metrics like accuracy, inference time, and overall efficiency (accuracy per unit of inference time).
The results show that there is no clear winner between joint and disjoint training. The best approach depends on the specific task and dataset characteristics. In some cases, joint training leads to better accuracy and efficiency, while in others, disjoint training performs better.
The authors provide insights into when each training regime is more appropriate. For example, joint training tends to work better when the early exits are closely related to the main task, while disjoint training is preferred when the early exits require more specialized knowledge.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough empirical evaluation of joint and disjoint training for early-exit models, which is a valuable contribution to the literature. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
- Architectural Variations: The authors only consider a single early-exit model architecture across all tasks. Exploring the interplay between training regime and architectural choices could yield additional insights.
- Compute and Memory Constraints: The paper focuses on overall efficiency but does not explicitly consider the computational and memory requirements of the different training regimes, which could be an important factor in practical deployments.
- Interpretability: The paper does not provide much insight into why joint or disjoint training may be preferable for certain tasks. Further analysis of the learned model representations could shed light on the underlying reasons.
Despite these minor caveats, the paper presents a thoughtful and well-executed study that advances our understanding of training early-exit models. Readers are encouraged to think critically about the trade-offs involved and consider how the findings might apply to their own use cases.
Conclusion
This paper provides a comprehensive investigation into the joint and disjoint training of early-exit neural network models. The key finding is that there is no one-size-fits-all approach - the best training regime depends on the specific task and dataset characteristics.
The insights from this research can help machine learning practitioners make more informed decisions when designing and training early-exit models for their applications. By understanding the trade-offs between joint and disjoint training, they can choose the approach that best meets their performance and efficiency requirements.
Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the growing body of work on efficient and adaptive neural network architectures, which have the potential to enable more deployable and resource-constrained AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Joint or Disjoint: Mixing Training Regimes for Early-Exit Models
Bart{l}omiej Krzepkowski, Monika Michaluk, Franciszek Szarwacki, Piotr Kubaty, Jary Pomponi, Tomasz Trzci'nski, Bartosz W'ojcik, Kamil Adamczewski
Early exits are an important efficiency mechanism integrated into deep neural networks that allows for the termination of the network's forward pass before processing through all its layers. By allowing early halting of the inference process for less complex inputs that reached high confidence, early exits significantly reduce the amount of computation required. Early exit methods add trainable internal classifiers which leads to more intricacy in the training process. However, there is no consistent verification of the approaches of training of early exit methods, and no unified scheme of training such models. Most early exit methods employ a training strategy that either simultaneously trains the backbone network and the exit heads or trains the exit heads separately. We propose a training approach where the backbone is initially trained on its own, followed by a phase where both the backbone and the exit heads are trained together. Thus, we advocate for organizing early-exit training strategies into three distinct categories, and then validate them for their performance and efficiency. In this benchmark, we perform both theoretical and empirical analysis of early-exit training regimes. We study the methods in terms of information flow, loss landscape and numerical rank of activations and gauge the suitability of regimes for various architectures and datasets.
Read more7/22/2024
🏋️
0
Hierarchical Training of Deep Neural Networks Using Early Exiting
Yamin Sepehri, Pedram Pad, Ahmet Caner Yuzuguler, Pascal Frossard, L. Andrea Dunbar
Deep neural networks provide state-of-the-art accuracy for vision tasks but they require significant resources for training. Thus, they are trained on cloud servers far from the edge devices that acquire the data. This issue increases communication cost, runtime and privacy concerns. In this study, a novel hierarchical training method for deep neural networks is proposed that uses early exits in a divided architecture between edge and cloud workers to reduce the communication cost, training runtime and privacy concerns. The method proposes a brand-new use case for early exits to separate the backward pass of neural networks between the edge and the cloud during the training phase. We address the issues of most available methods that due to the sequential nature of the training phase, cannot train the levels of hierarchy simultaneously or they do it with the cost of compromising privacy. In contrast, our method can use both edge and cloud workers simultaneously, does not share the raw input data with the cloud and does not require communication during the backward pass. Several simulations and on-device experiments for different neural network architectures demonstrate the effectiveness of this method. It is shown that the proposed method reduces the training runtime for VGG-16 and ResNet-18 architectures by 29% and 61% in CIFAR-10 classification and by 25% and 81% in Tiny ImageNet classification when the communication with the cloud is done over a low bit rate channel. This gain in the runtime is achieved whilst the accuracy drop is negligible. This method is advantageous for online learning of high-accuracy deep neural networks on sensor-holding low-resource devices such as mobile phones or robots as a part of an edge-cloud system, making them more flexible in facing new tasks and classes of data.
Read more5/22/2024
🤯
0
Jointly-Learned Exit and Inference for a Dynamic Neural Network : JEI-DNN
Florence Regol, Joud Chataoui, Mark Coates
Large pretrained models, coupled with fine-tuning, are slowly becoming established as the dominant architecture in machine learning. Even though these models offer impressive performance, their practical application is often limited by the prohibitive amount of resources required for every inference. Early-exiting dynamic neural networks (EDNN) circumvent this issue by allowing a model to make some of its predictions from intermediate layers (i.e., early-exit). Training an EDNN architecture is challenging as it consists of two intertwined components: the gating mechanism (GM) that controls early-exiting decisions and the intermediate inference modules (IMs) that perform inference from intermediate representations. As a result, most existing approaches rely on thresholding confidence metrics for the gating mechanism and strive to improve the underlying backbone network and the inference modules. Although successful, this approach has two fundamental shortcomings: 1) the GMs and the IMs are decoupled during training, leading to a train-test mismatch; and 2) the thresholding gating mechanism introduces a positive bias into the predictive probabilities, making it difficult to readily extract uncertainty information. We propose a novel architecture that connects these two modules. This leads to significant performance improvements on classification datasets and enables better uncertainty characterization capabilities.
Read more5/13/2024
0
Early-Exit meets Model-Distributed Inference at Edge Networks
Marco Colocrese, Erdem Koyuncu, Hulya Seferoglu
Distributed inference techniques can be broadly classified into data-distributed and model-distributed schemes. In data-distributed inference (DDI), each worker carries the entire deep neural network (DNN) model but processes only a subset of the data. However, feeding the data to workers results in high communication costs, especially when the data is large. An emerging paradigm is model-distributed inference (MDI), where each worker carries only a subset of DNN layers. In MDI, a source device that has data processes a few layers of DNN and sends the output to a neighboring device, i.e., offloads the rest of the layers. This process ends when all layers are processed in a distributed manner. In this paper, we investigate the design and development of MDI with early-exit, which advocates that there is no need to process all the layers of a model for some data to reach the desired accuracy, i.e., we can exit the model without processing all the layers if target accuracy is reached. We design a framework MDI-Exit that adaptively determines early-exit and offloading policies as well as data admission at the source. Experimental results on a real-life testbed of NVIDIA Nano edge devices show that MDI-Exit processes more data when accuracy is fixed and results in higher accuracy for the fixed data rate.
Read more8/13/2024