The Joint Weighted Average (JWA) Operator
0
👨🏫
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Information aggregation is a crucial tool for decision-making in the face of uncertainty, used by both humans and machines.
- Existing approaches to aggregation can be divided into two categories: those that assign worth or weight to information sources, and those that assign worth to the evidence from those sources.
- Prior work has identified the need to apply both approaches simultaneously, but has not yet conceptually integrated them or provided a semantic interpretation of the resulting aggregation approach.
Plain English Explanation
Information aggregation is the process of combining different pieces of information to make a decision or reach a conclusion. This is an important tool for both people and machines, especially when there is uncertainty or incomplete information involved.
Traditionally, there have been two main ways to approach information aggregation. The first is to assign a value or "weight" to the different sources of information, based on how reliable or trustworthy they are perceived to be. This is common in the social sciences, as it can provide useful insights into the credibility of the sources.
The second approach is to assign value or weight to the actual evidence or data coming from those sources, rather than the sources themselves. This is more common in the physical sciences, and it underlies techniques like linear order statistics and non-linear aggregation.
Previous research has recognized the need to use both of these approaches together, but hasn't yet developed a way to conceptually integrate them or explain the resulting aggregation method in a clear, semantic way.
Technical Explanation
This paper proposes a novel "joint weighted averaging operator" that conceptually integrates both the source-centric and evidence-centric approaches to information aggregation. The researchers leverage compositional geometry to provide a systematic basis for combining different weighted aggregation operators, which has not been done before in the literature.
The resulting operator allows for the systematic integration of a priori beliefs about the worth of both the information sources and the evidence arising from those sources. This reflects a semantic integration of the two weighting strategies, providing a more holistic approach to information aggregation.
The paper demonstrates how this operator can be applied across various disciplines, from machine learning to psychology, and highlights its potential usefulness in tackling unknown participation statistics in federated learning.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and theoretically grounded approach to information aggregation that addresses an important gap in the existing literature. By integrating the source-centric and evidence-centric weighting strategies, the proposed operator offers a more comprehensive way to handle uncertainty and make informed decisions.
However, the paper does not provide any empirical evaluation or real-world applications of the operator. It would be helpful to see how the operator performs in practical scenarios and how it compares to other aggregation methods. Additionally, the researchers do not discuss any potential limitations or challenges that may arise when implementing the operator in complex, high-stakes decision-making contexts.
Further research could explore the operator's performance in specific domains, such as federated learning or cooperative perception, and investigate ways to make the integration of source-centric and evidence-centric weighting more intuitive and interpretable for end-users.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to information aggregation that integrates two traditionally distinct strategies: weighting information sources and weighting the evidence from those sources. By leveraging compositional geometry, the researchers have developed a systematic operator that can combine these weighting approaches, providing a more holistic and semantically interpretable method for decision-making under uncertainty.
The potential applications of this operator span a wide range of disciplines, from machine learning to psychology, and it may prove particularly useful in areas like federated learning where handling unknown participation statistics is a significant challenge. While the paper does not provide empirical evaluation, it lays the groundwork for further research and development in this important area of information aggregation.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
👨🏫
0
The Joint Weighted Average (JWA) Operator
Stephen B. Broomell, Christian Wagner
Information aggregation is a vital tool for human and machine decision making in the presence of uncertainty. Traditionally, approaches to aggregation broadly diverge into two categories, those which attribute a worth or weight to information sources and those which attribute said worth to the evidence arising from said sources. The latter is pervasive in the physical sciences, underpinning linear order statistics and enabling non-linear aggregation. The former is popular in the social sciences, providing interpretable insight on the sources. While prior work has identified the need to apply both approaches simultaneously, it has yet to conceptually integrate both approaches and provide a semantic interpretation of the arising aggregation approach. Here, we conceptually integrate both approaches in a novel joint weighted averaging operator. We leverage compositional geometry to underpin this integration, showing how it provides a systematic basis for the combination of weighted aggregation operators--which has thus far not been considered in the literature. We proceed to show how the resulting operator systematically integrates a priori beliefs about the worth of both sources and evidence, reflecting the semantic integration of both weighting strategies. We conclude and highlight the potential of the operator across disciplines, from machine learning to psychology.
Read more5/6/2024
🏷️
0
Optimizing the Optimal Weighted Average: Efficient Distributed Sparse Classification
Fred Lu, Ryan R. Curtin, Edward Raff, Francis Ferraro, James Holt
While distributed training is often viewed as a solution to optimizing linear models on increasingly large datasets, inter-machine communication costs of popular distributed approaches can dominate as data dimensionality increases. Recent work on non-interactive algorithms shows that approximate solutions for linear models can be obtained efficiently with only a single round of communication among machines. However, this approximation often degenerates as the number of machines increases. In this paper, building on the recent optimal weighted average method, we introduce a new technique, ACOWA, that allows an extra round of communication to achieve noticeably better approximation quality with minor runtime increases. Results show that for sparse distributed logistic regression, ACOWA obtains solutions that are more faithful to the empirical risk minimizer and attain substantially higher accuracy than other distributed algorithms.
Read more6/5/2024
🐍
0
Adaptive Stochastic Weight Averaging
Caglar Demir, Arnab Sharma, Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo
Ensemble models often improve generalization performances in challenging tasks. Yet, traditional techniques based on prediction averaging incur three well-known disadvantages: the computational overhead of training multiple models, increased latency, and memory requirements at test time. To address these issues, the Stochastic Weight Averaging (SWA) technique maintains a running average of model parameters from a specific epoch onward. Despite its potential benefits, maintaining a running average of parameters can hinder generalization, as an underlying running model begins to overfit. Conversely, an inadequately chosen starting point can render SWA more susceptible to underfitting compared to an underlying running model. In this work, we propose Adaptive Stochastic Weight Averaging (ASWA) technique that updates a running average of model parameters, only when generalization performance is improved on the validation dataset. Hence, ASWA can be seen as a combination of SWA with the early stopping technique, where the former accepts all updates on a parameter ensemble model and the latter rejects any update on an underlying running model. We conducted extensive experiments ranging from image classification to multi-hop reasoning over knowledge graphs. Our experiments over 11 benchmark datasets with 7 baseline models suggest that ASWA leads to a statistically better generalization across models and datasets
Read more6/28/2024
0
Over-the-Air Federated Learning via Weighted Aggregation
Seyed Mohammad Azimi-Abarghouyi, Leandros Tassiulas
This paper introduces a new federated learning scheme that leverages over-the-air computation. A novel feature of this scheme is the proposal to employ adaptive weights during aggregation, a facet treated as predefined in other over-the-air schemes. This can mitigate the impact of wireless channel conditions on learning performance, without needing channel state information at transmitter side (CSIT). We provide a mathematical methodology to derive the convergence bound for the proposed scheme in the context of computational heterogeneity and general loss functions, supplemented with design insights. Accordingly, we propose aggregation cost metrics and efficient algorithms to find optimized weights for the aggregation. Finally, through numerical experiments, we validate the effectiveness of the proposed scheme. Even with the challenges posed by channel conditions and device heterogeneity, the proposed scheme surpasses other over-the-air strategies by an accuracy improvement of 15% over the scheme using CSIT and 30% compared to the one without CSIT.
Read more9/14/2024