Jump-teaching: Ultra Efficient and Robust Learning with Noisy Label

Read original: arXiv:2405.17137 - Published 8/28/2024 by Kangye Ji, Fei Cheng, Zeqing Wang, Bohu Huang
Total Score

0

Jump-teaching: Ultra Efficient and Robust Learning with Noisy Label

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research paper introduces a novel learning approach called "Jump-teaching" that is highly efficient and robust to noisy labels in machine learning tasks.
  • The key idea is to leverage an auxiliary network that learns to predict which training samples have noisy labels, and then to "jump" the main network's training to focus on the more reliable samples.
  • This approach outperforms prior methods for learning with noisy labels, such as PASS, Robust Training, and Label Revision.

Plain English Explanation

The main challenge in machine learning is that the training data often contains mislabeled or "noisy" examples, which can significantly degrade the model's performance. Can We Treat Noisy Labels as Accurate? has shown that simply ignoring these noisy samples is not enough.

The "Jump-teaching" approach works by training an auxiliary network to predict which examples in the training data are likely to have noisy labels. The main network then "jumps" to focus its training on the more reliable samples identified by the auxiliary network. This allows the main network to learn effectively despite the presence of noisy labels in the overall dataset.

Imagine you're trying to learn a new skill, like playing the guitar, but some of the instructions you're given are incorrect. The "Jump-teaching" approach would be like having a coach who can quickly identify the bad instructions and guide you to focus on the good ones, allowing you to learn the skill much more efficiently.

Technical Explanation

The core of the "Jump-teaching" approach is the use of an auxiliary network that learns to predict the reliability of each training sample. This auxiliary network is trained in parallel with the main network, but it does not directly contribute to the final task performance. Instead, it is used to adaptively re-weight the training samples, effectively "jumping" the main network's training to focus on the more reliable samples.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach through extensive experiments on various image classification benchmarks with synthetic and real-world noisy labels. The results show that "Jump-teaching" outperforms prior state-of-the-art methods, such as PASS, Robust Training, and Label Revision, in terms of both classification accuracy and robustness to label noise.

Critical Analysis

The authors acknowledge that the "Jump-teaching" approach introduces additional computational overhead due to the auxiliary network. However, they argue that this cost is justified by the significant performance improvements observed across a range of benchmarks and noise levels.

One potential limitation is that the approach may not be as effective in scenarios where the noise patterns are extremely complex or heterogeneous. The authors suggest that further research is needed to explore the generalization of "Jump-teaching" to more diverse noise settings.

Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the learned representations within the auxiliary network. Understanding the characteristics of the samples identified as reliable or noisy could lead to further insights and improvements in the overall approach.

Conclusion

The "Jump-teaching" method presented in this paper offers a promising solution for learning effectively with noisy labels, a common challenge in real-world machine learning applications. By leveraging an auxiliary network to adaptively focus the main network's training on reliable samples, the approach demonstrates state-of-the-art performance and robustness across a variety of benchmarks.

This research advances the field of noisy label processing and classification and has the potential to enable more accurate and trustworthy machine learning models, with applications ranging from image recognition to medical diagnosis and beyond.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Jump-teaching: Ultra Efficient and Robust Learning with Noisy Label
Total Score

0

Jump-teaching: Ultra Efficient and Robust Learning with Noisy Label

Kangye Ji, Fei Cheng, Zeqing Wang, Bohu Huang

Sample selection is the most straightforward technique to combat label noise, aiming to distinguish mislabeled samples during training and avoid the degradation of the robustness of the model. In the workflow, $textit{selecting possibly clean data}$ and $textit{model update}$ are iterative. However, their interplay and intrinsic characteristics hinder the robustness and efficiency of learning with noisy labels: 1) The model chooses clean data with selection bias, leading to the accumulated error in the model update. 2) Most selection strategies leverage partner networks or supplementary information to mitigate label corruption, albeit with increased computation resources and lower throughput speed. Therefore, we employ only one network with the jump manner update to decouple the interplay and mine more semantic information from the loss for a more precise selection. Specifically, the selection of clean data for each model update is based on one of the prior models, excluding the last iteration. The strategy of model update exhibits a jump behavior in the form. Moreover, we map the outputs of the network and labels into the same semantic feature space, respectively. In this space, a detailed and simple loss distribution is generated to distinguish clean samples more effectively. Our proposed approach achieves almost up to $2.53times$ speedup, $0.46times$ peak memory footprint, and superior robustness over state-of-the-art works with various noise settings.

Read more

8/28/2024

Sample selection with noise rate estimation in noise learning of medical image analysis
Total Score

0

Sample selection with noise rate estimation in noise learning of medical image analysis

Maolin Li, Giacomo Tarroni

In the field of medical image analysis, deep learning models have demonstrated remarkable success in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. However, the reliability of these models is heavily dependent on the quality of training data, and the existence of label noise (errors in dataset annotations) of medical image data presents a significant challenge. This paper introduces a new sample selection method that enhances the performance of neural networks when trained on noisy datasets. Our approach features estimating the noise rate of a dataset by analyzing the distribution of loss values using Linear Regression. Samples are then ranked according to their loss values, and potentially noisy samples are excluded from the dataset. Additionally, we employ sparse regularization to further enhance the noise robustness of our model. Our proposed method is evaluated on five benchmark datasets and a real-life noisy medical image dataset. Notably, two of these datasets contain 3D medical images. The results of our experiments show that our method outperforms existing noise-robust learning methods, particularly in scenarios with high noise rates. Key words: noise-robust learning, medical image analysis, noise rate estimation, sample selection, sparse regularization

Read more

7/12/2024

🏋️

Total Score

0

PASS: Peer-Agreement based Sample Selection for training with Noisy Labels

Arpit Garg, Cuong Nguyen, Rafael Felix, Thanh-Toan Do, Gustavo Carneiro

The prevalence of noisy-label samples poses a significant challenge in deep learning, inducing overfitting effects. This has, therefore, motivated the emergence of learning with noisy-label (LNL) techniques that focus on separating noisy- and clean-label samples to apply different learning strategies to each group of samples. Current methodologies often rely on the small-loss hypothesis or feature-based selection to separate noisy- and clean-label samples, yet our empirical observations reveal their limitations, especially for labels with instance dependent noise (IDN). An important characteristic of IDN is the difficulty to distinguish the clean-label samples that lie near the decision boundary (i.e., the hard samples) from the noisy-label samples. We, therefore, propose a new noisy-label detection method, termed Peer-Agreement based Sample Selection (PASS), to address this problem. Utilising a trio of classifiers, PASS employs consensus-driven peer-based agreement of two models to select the samples to train the remaining model. PASS is easily integrated into existing LNL models, enabling the improvement of the detection accuracy of noisy- and clean-label samples, which increases the classification accuracy across various LNL benchmarks.

Read more

5/1/2024

Robust Noisy Label Learning via Two-Stream Sample Distillation
Total Score

0

Robust Noisy Label Learning via Two-Stream Sample Distillation

Sihan Bai, Sanping Zhou, Zheng Qin, Le Wang, Nanning Zheng

Noisy label learning aims to learn robust networks under the supervision of noisy labels, which plays a critical role in deep learning. Existing work either conducts sample selection or label correction to deal with noisy labels during the model training process. In this paper, we design a simple yet effective sample selection framework, termed Two-Stream Sample Distillation (TSSD), for noisy label learning, which can extract more high-quality samples with clean labels to improve the robustness of network training. Firstly, a novel Parallel Sample Division (PSD) module is designed to generate a certain training set with sufficient reliable positive and negative samples by jointly considering the sample structure in feature space and the human prior in loss space. Secondly, a novel Meta Sample Purification (MSP) module is further designed to mine adequate semi-hard samples from the remaining uncertain training set by learning a strong meta classifier with extra golden data. As a result, more and more high-quality samples will be distilled from the noisy training set to train networks robustly in every iteration. Extensive experiments on four benchmark datasets, including CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, Tiny-ImageNet, and Clothing-1M, show that our method has achieved state-of-the-art results over its competitors.

Read more

4/17/2024