Sample selection with noise rate estimation in noise learning of medical image analysis

Read original: arXiv:2312.15233 - Published 7/12/2024 by Maolin Li, Giacomo Tarroni
Total Score

0

Sample selection with noise rate estimation in noise learning of medical image analysis

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a novel technique for sample selection with noise rate estimation in the context of medical image analysis.
  • The approach aims to address the challenge of learning with noisy labels, which is common in medical imaging datasets.
  • The proposed method leverages both sample selection and noise rate estimation to improve the robustness of the learning process.

Plain English Explanation

In the field of medical image analysis, it is common for the labels (or classifications) of the images to contain errors or noise. This can happen for various reasons, such as human annotation mistakes or inherent ambiguity in the images. This noise in the labels can negatively impact the performance of machine learning models trained on this data.

The researchers in this paper have developed a new technique to address this challenge. Their approach involves two key elements:

  1. Sample Selection: The method selectively chooses which samples (or images) to include in the training process, based on an assessment of the noise level. It prioritizes samples that are likely to have accurate labels and downweights or excludes samples with higher noise.

  2. Noise Rate Estimation: Alongside the sample selection, the method also estimates the overall noise rate in the dataset. This information can then be used to further improve the robustness of the learning process.

By combining these two components - selective sampling and noise rate estimation - the researchers aim to create a more effective and reliable machine learning system for medical image analysis, even in the presence of noisy labels. This could lead to more accurate diagnosis and better healthcare outcomes.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a novel technique called "link text," which addresses the problem of learning with noisy labels in medical image analysis tasks.

The method consists of two main components:

  1. Sample Selection: The researchers develop a sample selection strategy that evaluates the noise level of each training sample and selectively includes or excludes samples based on this assessment. This is done by training a noise-aware classifier that can estimate the noise rate for each sample.

  2. Noise Rate Estimation: Alongside the sample selection, the method also estimates the overall noise rate in the dataset. This global noise rate estimation is then used to further refine the training process and improve the robustness of the final model.

The sample selection and noise rate estimation components are tightly coupled, with each informing and improving the other. This synergistic approach is designed to enable more effective learning in the presence of noisy labels, a common challenge in medical image analysis tasks.

The researchers evaluate their proposed method on several medical image datasets and compare its performance to other state-of-the-art techniques, such as "link text," "link text," "link text," and "link text." The results demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach in improving the robustness and accuracy of medical image analysis models.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed and thorough approach to the problem of learning with noisy labels in medical image analysis. The combination of sample selection and noise rate estimation is a novel and promising solution that addresses a significant challenge in this field.

One potential limitation of the study is the reliance on synthetic noise injection to evaluate the method's performance. While this allows for controlled experiments, it may not fully capture the complexities of real-world noisy label scenarios, which can involve more nuanced and context-dependent sources of noise. Further validation on diverse real-world medical image datasets would help strengthen the generalizability of the findings.

Additionally, the paper could have explored more insights into the trade-offs and failure modes of the proposed approach. For example, it would be interesting to understand the scenarios where the sample selection and noise rate estimation techniques might struggle, and how this could impact the overall performance of the system.

Despite these minor concerns, the paper presents a solid and innovative contribution to the field of medical image analysis, with the potential to significantly improve the robustness and reliability of machine learning models in this critical domain.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel technique for sample selection with noise rate estimation, designed to address the challenge of learning with noisy labels in medical image analysis tasks. The method's dual focus on selective sampling and noise rate estimation allows it to effectively mitigate the negative impacts of label noise, leading to more robust and accurate machine learning models.

The results demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach compared to other state-of-the-art techniques, highlighting its potential to enhance the reliability and performance of medical image analysis systems. This work represents an important step forward in developing more robust and trustworthy AI-powered tools for healthcare, with the ultimate goal of improving patient outcomes and the quality of medical care.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Sample selection with noise rate estimation in noise learning of medical image analysis
Total Score

0

Sample selection with noise rate estimation in noise learning of medical image analysis

Maolin Li, Giacomo Tarroni

In the field of medical image analysis, deep learning models have demonstrated remarkable success in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. However, the reliability of these models is heavily dependent on the quality of training data, and the existence of label noise (errors in dataset annotations) of medical image data presents a significant challenge. This paper introduces a new sample selection method that enhances the performance of neural networks when trained on noisy datasets. Our approach features estimating the noise rate of a dataset by analyzing the distribution of loss values using Linear Regression. Samples are then ranked according to their loss values, and potentially noisy samples are excluded from the dataset. Additionally, we employ sparse regularization to further enhance the noise robustness of our model. Our proposed method is evaluated on five benchmark datasets and a real-life noisy medical image dataset. Notably, two of these datasets contain 3D medical images. The results of our experiments show that our method outperforms existing noise-robust learning methods, particularly in scenarios with high noise rates. Key words: noise-robust learning, medical image analysis, noise rate estimation, sample selection, sparse regularization

Read more

7/12/2024

QMix: Quality-aware Learning with Mixed Noise for Robust Retinal Disease Diagnosis
Total Score

0

QMix: Quality-aware Learning with Mixed Noise for Robust Retinal Disease Diagnosis

Junlin Hou, Jilan Xu, Rui Feng, Hao Chen

Due to the complexity of medical image acquisition and the difficulty of annotation, medical image datasets inevitably contain noise. Noisy data with wrong labels affects the robustness and generalization ability of deep neural networks. Previous noise learning methods mainly considered noise arising from images being mislabeled, i.e. label noise, assuming that all mislabeled images are of high image quality. However, medical images are prone to suffering extreme quality issues, i.e. data noise, where discriminative visual features are missing for disease diagnosis. In this paper, we propose a noise learning framework, termed as QMix, that learns a robust disease diagnosis model under mixed noise. QMix alternates between sample separation and quality-aware semisupervised training in each training epoch. In the sample separation phase, we design a joint uncertainty-loss criterion to effectively separate (1) correctly labeled images; (2) mislabeled images with high quality and (3) mislabeled images with low quality. In the semi-supervised training phase, we train a disease diagnosis model to learn robust feature representation from the separated samples. Specifically, we devise a sample-reweighing loss to mitigate the effect of mislabeled images with low quality during training. Meanwhile, a contrastive enhancement loss is proposed to further distinguish mislabeled images with low quality from correctly labeled images. QMix achieved state-of-the-art disease diagnosis performance on five public retinal image datasets and exhibited substantial improvement on robustness against mixed noise.

Read more

4/9/2024

Active Label Refinement for Robust Training of Imbalanced Medical Image Classification Tasks in the Presence of High Label Noise
Total Score

0

Active Label Refinement for Robust Training of Imbalanced Medical Image Classification Tasks in the Presence of High Label Noise

Bidur Khanal, Tianhong Dai, Binod Bhattarai, Cristian Linte

The robustness of supervised deep learning-based medical image classification is significantly undermined by label noise. Although several methods have been proposed to enhance classification performance in the presence of noisy labels, they face some challenges: 1) a struggle with class-imbalanced datasets, leading to the frequent overlooking of minority classes as noisy samples; 2) a singular focus on maximizing performance using noisy datasets, without incorporating experts-in-the-loop for actively cleaning the noisy labels. To mitigate these challenges, we propose a two-phase approach that combines Learning with Noisy Labels (LNL) and active learning. This approach not only improves the robustness of medical image classification in the presence of noisy labels, but also iteratively improves the quality of the dataset by relabeling the important incorrect labels, under a limited annotation budget. Furthermore, we introduce a novel Variance of Gradients approach in LNL phase, which complements the loss-based sample selection by also sampling under-represented samples. Using two imbalanced noisy medical classification datasets, we demonstrate that that our proposed technique is superior to its predecessors at handling class imbalance by not misidentifying clean samples from minority classes as mostly noisy samples.

Read more

7/9/2024

Jump-teaching: Ultra Efficient and Robust Learning with Noisy Label
Total Score

0

Jump-teaching: Ultra Efficient and Robust Learning with Noisy Label

Kangye Ji, Fei Cheng, Zeqing Wang, Bohu Huang

Sample selection is the most straightforward technique to combat label noise, aiming to distinguish mislabeled samples during training and avoid the degradation of the robustness of the model. In the workflow, $textit{selecting possibly clean data}$ and $textit{model update}$ are iterative. However, their interplay and intrinsic characteristics hinder the robustness and efficiency of learning with noisy labels: 1) The model chooses clean data with selection bias, leading to the accumulated error in the model update. 2) Most selection strategies leverage partner networks or supplementary information to mitigate label corruption, albeit with increased computation resources and lower throughput speed. Therefore, we employ only one network with the jump manner update to decouple the interplay and mine more semantic information from the loss for a more precise selection. Specifically, the selection of clean data for each model update is based on one of the prior models, excluding the last iteration. The strategy of model update exhibits a jump behavior in the form. Moreover, we map the outputs of the network and labels into the same semantic feature space, respectively. In this space, a detailed and simple loss distribution is generated to distinguish clean samples more effectively. Our proposed approach achieves almost up to $2.53times$ speedup, $0.46times$ peak memory footprint, and superior robustness over state-of-the-art works with various noise settings.

Read more

8/28/2024