Kernel Ridge Riesz Representers: Generalization Error and Mis-specification

Read original: arXiv:2102.11076 - Published 7/8/2024 by Rahul Singh
Total Score

0

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper introduces a new approach called Kernel Ridge Riesz Representers (KRRR) for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects, which addresses limitations of previous kernel balancing weight methods.
  • KRRR is a generalization of kernel ridge regression and kernel ridge balancing weights, providing strong theoretical guarantees on population-level error rates and a closed-form solution.
  • The framework relaxes the assumption that the underlying regression model is correctly specified, and extends inference beyond average effects to heterogeneous effects.
  • The authors demonstrate the use of KRRR to estimate heterogeneous treatment effects of 401(k) eligibility on assets by age.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a new statistical technique called Kernel Ridge Riesz Representers (KRRR) that can be used to estimate the effects of a treatment (like a new policy or program) on different groups of people.

Previous methods for estimating these "treatment effects" had some limitations. They didn't provide a good way to measure how accurate the estimates were, they required the researchers to have the right set of variables to include in the analysis, and they could only estimate the average effect across all people, not how the effect might differ for different groups.

The KRRR approach addresses these limitations. It provides a way to measure how accurate the estimates are, and it doesn't require the researchers to have the perfect set of variables. It also allows them to look at how the treatment effect might be different for people of different ages, incomes, or other characteristics.

The authors demonstrate KRRR by using it to study the effect of 401(k) retirement account eligibility on people's assets, looking at how the effect differs by the person's age. This type of analysis can help policymakers understand how a program or policy might impact different groups in society.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a new characterization of kernel balancing weights as Kernel Ridge Riesz Representers (KRRR). KRRR is an exact generalization of kernel ridge regression and kernel ridge balancing weights.

The authors prove that KRRR has strong theoretical properties similar to kernel ridge regression, including population-level $L_2$ error rate control and a standalone closed-form solution. Importantly, the KRRR framework relaxes the assumption that the underlying regression model is correctly specified by the observed features.

This allows the KRRR approach to extend inference beyond just average treatment effects to heterogeneous treatment effects - that is, estimating how the causal effect of the treatment varies for different subgroups. The authors demonstrate KRRR by using it to estimate the heterogeneous effects of 401(k) eligibility on assets by age.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a valuable contribution by introducing KRRR as a generalization of kernel balancing weights that addresses several limitations of prior work. The theoretical guarantees and closed-form solution are particularly notable.

However, the paper does not deeply explore the practical challenges that may arise when applying KRRR in real-world settings. For example, the performance of KRRR may depend heavily on the choice of kernel function and regularization parameter, which can be difficult to tune optimally. The authors also do not compare KRRR to other popular causal inference methods, such as doubly robust estimation or debiased collaborative filtering.

Further research is needed to better understand the relative strengths and weaknesses of KRRR compared to alternative approaches, as well as to explore its performance on a wider range of real-world datasets and causal inference problems.

Conclusion

The Kernel Ridge Riesz Representers (KRRR) framework introduced in this paper provides a novel and promising approach for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects. By relaxing assumptions about the underlying regression model and providing strong theoretical guarantees, KRRR has the potential to advance the field of causal inference.

The application of KRRR to study the effects of 401(k) eligibility on assets demonstrates its practical utility. As policymakers and researchers seek to understand how programs and interventions impact different segments of the population, tools like KRRR will become increasingly valuable.

Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in causal inference methodology, with opportunities for further development and real-world impact.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Total Score

0

Kernel Ridge Riesz Representers: Generalization Error and Mis-specification

Rahul Singh

Kernel balancing weights provide confidence intervals for average treatment effects, based on the idea of balancing covariates for the treated group and untreated group in feature space, often with ridge regularization. Previous works on the classical kernel ridge balancing weights have certain limitations: (i) not articulating generalization error for the balancing weights, (ii) typically requiring correct specification of features, and (iii) justifying Gaussian approximation for only average effects. I interpret kernel balancing weights as kernel ridge Riesz representers (KRRR) and address these limitations via a new characterization of the counterfactual effective dimension. KRRR is an exact generalization of kernel ridge regression and kernel ridge balancing weights. I prove strong properties similar to kernel ridge regression: population $L_2$ rates controlling generalization error, and a standalone closed form solution that can interpolate. The framework relaxes the stringent assumption that the underlying regression model is correctly specified by the features. It extends Gaussian approximation beyond average effects to heterogeneous effects, justifying confidence sets for causal functions. I use KRRR to quantify uncertainty for heterogeneous treatment effects, by age, of 401(k) eligibility on assets.

Read more

7/8/2024

↗️

Total Score

0

Universality of kernel random matrices and kernel regression in the quadratic regime

Parthe Pandit, Zhichao Wang, Yizhe Zhu

Kernel ridge regression (KRR) is a popular class of machine learning models that has become an important tool for understanding deep learning. Much of the focus has been on studying the proportional asymptotic regime, $n asymp d$, where $n$ is the number of training samples and $d$ is the dimension of the dataset. In this regime, under certain conditions on the data distribution, the kernel random matrix involved in KRR exhibits behavior akin to that of a linear kernel. In this work, we extend the study of kernel regression to the quadratic asymptotic regime, where $n asymp d^2$. In this regime, we demonstrate that a broad class of inner-product kernels exhibit behavior similar to a quadratic kernel. Specifically, we establish an operator norm approximation bound for the difference between the original kernel random matrix and a quadratic kernel random matrix with additional correction terms compared to the Taylor expansion of the kernel functions. The approximation works for general data distributions under a Gaussian-moment-matching assumption with a covariance structure. This new approximation is utilized to obtain a limiting spectral distribution of the original kernel matrix and characterize the precise asymptotic training and generalization errors for KRR in the quadratic regime when $n/d^2$ converges to a non-zero constant. The generalization errors are obtained for both deterministic and random teacher models. Our proof techniques combine moment methods, Wick's formula, orthogonal polynomials, and resolvent analysis of random matrices with correlated entries.

Read more

8/6/2024

↗️

Total Score

0

Characterizing Overfitting in Kernel Ridgeless Regression Through the Eigenspectrum

Tin Sum Cheng, Aurelien Lucchi, Anastasis Kratsios, David Belius

We derive new bounds for the condition number of kernel matrices, which we then use to enhance existing non-asymptotic test error bounds for kernel ridgeless regression (KRR) in the over-parameterized regime for a fixed input dimension. For kernels with polynomial spectral decay, we recover the bound from previous work; for exponential decay, our bound is non-trivial and novel. Our contribution is two-fold: (i) we rigorously prove the phenomena of tempered overfitting and catastrophic overfitting under the sub-Gaussian design assumption, closing an existing gap in the literature; (ii) we identify that the independence of the features plays an important role in guaranteeing tempered overfitting, raising concerns about approximating KRR generalization using the Gaussian design assumption in previous literature.

Read more

5/31/2024

↗️

Total Score

0

Learning Analysis of Kernel Ridgeless Regression with Asymmetric Kernel Learning

Fan He, Mingzhen He, Lei Shi, Xiaolin Huang, Johan A. K. Suykens

Ridgeless regression has garnered attention among researchers, particularly in light of the ``Benign Overfitting'' phenomenon, where models interpolating noisy samples demonstrate robust generalization. However, kernel ridgeless regression does not always perform well due to the lack of flexibility. This paper enhances kernel ridgeless regression with Locally-Adaptive-Bandwidths (LAB) RBF kernels, incorporating kernel learning techniques to improve performance in both experiments and theory. For the first time, we demonstrate that functions learned from LAB RBF kernels belong to an integral space of Reproducible Kernel Hilbert Spaces (RKHSs). Despite the absence of explicit regularization in the proposed model, its optimization is equivalent to solving an $ell_0$-regularized problem in the integral space of RKHSs, elucidating the origin of its generalization ability. Taking an approximation analysis viewpoint, we introduce an $l_q$-norm analysis technique (with $0<q<1$) to derive the learning rate for the proposed model under mild conditions. This result deepens our theoretical understanding, explaining that our algorithm's robust approximation ability arises from the large capacity of the integral space of RKHSs, while its generalization ability is ensured by sparsity, controlled by the number of support vectors. Experimental results on both synthetic and real datasets validate our theoretical conclusions.

Read more

6/4/2024