KNOWCOMP POKEMON Team at DialAM-2024: A Two-Stage Pipeline for Detecting Relations in Dialogical Argument Mining

Overview

• This paper presents a two-stage pipeline developed by the KnowComp Pokemon Team for detecting relations in dialogical argument mining at the DialAM-2024 competition.
• The pipeline involves a claim detection model followed by a relation extraction model to identify the different types of argumentative relations between claims.
• The researchers evaluate their approach on the DialAM-2024 dataset and compare it to other state-of-the-art methods.

Plain English Explanation

The paper describes a system developed by the KnowComp Pokemon Team to analyze the structure of arguments in conversations. Argument mining is the task of automatically identifying the key claims, reasons, and relationships between them in text or dialogue.

The team's approach uses a two-step process. First, a model is used to detect the individual claims being made by the speakers. Then, a second model looks at how those claims are connected, identifying the different types of argumentative relationships between them, such as support or attack.

The researchers tested their system on the DialAM-2024 dataset, which contains transcripts of conversations where people are debating or discussing different issues. They compared the performance of their pipeline to other leading argument mining approaches.

The key innovation in this work is the use of this two-stage architecture, where claim detection and relation extraction are handled separately. This allows the models to focus on these distinct sub-tasks within the broader challenge of understanding the structure of arguments in dialogues.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a two-stage pipeline for detecting argumentative relations in dialogical text.

The first stage is a claim detection model that identifies the individual claims being made by speakers. This is framed as a sequence labeling task, where each token in the dialogue is classified as either being part of a claim or not. The researchers experimented with various neural architectures for this, including BERT-based models.

The second stage is a relation extraction model that examines the detected claims and classifies the argumentative relationships between them. This includes identifying support, attack, and other rhetorical connections. The relation model takes the output of the claim detector and learns to predict the link types using a graph neural network approach.

The full pipeline is evaluated on the DialAM-2024 dataset, which contains transcripts of argumentative dialogues annotated with claim boundaries and relation types. The researchers compare their two-stage approach to end-to-end argument mining baselines and report improvements in both claim detection and relation extraction performance.

Critical Analysis

The key strength of this work is the modular two-stage architecture, which allows the claim detection and relation extraction components to be optimized separately. This is an intuitive and effective approach, as the sub-tasks have distinct challenges that may require different modeling techniques.

However, a potential limitation is that errors in the claim detection stage could propagate and degrade the performance of the downstream relation extraction. The paper does not fully address how robust the pipeline is to such cascading errors.

Additionally, the evaluation is limited to a single dataset, DialAM-2024, which may not capture the full diversity of real-world dialogical arguments. Cross-lingual and cross-domain generalization is an important consideration for practical argument mining systems.

Overall, the two-stage approach presented in this paper represents a promising direction for dialogical argument mining. Further research could explore ways to make the pipeline more end-to-end and improve its reliability in the face of imperfect claim detection.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel two-stage pipeline developed by the KnowComp Pokemon Team for detecting argumentative relations in dialogical text. The approach first identifies individual claims being made, then classifies the various support, attack, and other relationships between those claims.

Tested on the DialAM-2024 dataset, the researchers' system outperforms end-to-end argument mining baselines. This demonstrates the value of separating claim detection and relation extraction into distinct sub-tasks that can be optimized independently.

While further work is needed to improve the robustness and generalization of the pipeline, this paper represents an important contribution to the field of dialogical argument mining. The two-stage architecture provides a promising framework for developing practical systems that can accurately understand the structure of arguments in real-world conversational settings.