Kullback-Leibler Maillard Sampling for Multi-armed Bandits with Bounded Rewards

Overview

• The paper investigates K-armed bandit problems, where the reward distributions of the arms are all within the [0,1] interval.
• It proposes the Kullback-Leibler Maillard Sampling (KL-MS) algorithm, an extension of the Maillard sampling method, to achieve a KL-style gap-dependent regret bound.
• The authors show that KL-MS is asymptotically optimal for Bernoulli rewards and has a worst-case regret bound of the form O(sqrt(μ*(1-μ*) K T ln K) + K ln T), where μ* is the expected reward of the optimal arm and T is the time horizon.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on a specific type of decision-making problem called a K-armed bandit problem. In this problem, there are K different "arms" (options) that a decision-maker can choose from, and each arm has a different probability of providing a reward. The researchers wanted to develop a method that could efficiently explore these different arms and find the one that is most likely to provide the highest reward.

The authors proposed a new algorithm called Kullback-Leibler Maillard Sampling (KL-MS), which is an extension of an existing method called Maillard sampling. Maillard sampling has been shown to work well in similar problems where the rewards are "sub-Gaussian," meaning they follow a distribution that is not too far from a normal distribution.

The key feature of KL-MS is that it uses a specific mathematical distance measure called Kullback-Leibler divergence to guide the exploration of the different arms. This allows the algorithm to achieve a regret bound that is optimal in a certain sense, meaning it can't be improved upon too much. The regret bound describes how much the algorithm's performance is expected to differ from the best possible performance, and the authors show that for KL-MS, this bound has a specific mathematical form that depends on the properties of the optimal arm and the number of arms.

Overall, the paper presents a new algorithm that improves upon existing methods for efficiently exploring and exploiting the different options in a K-armed bandit problem, with potential applications in areas like online decision-making and reinforcement learning.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates K-armed bandit problems, where the reward distributions of the arms are all supported on the [0,1] interval. Designing regret-efficient randomized exploration algorithms in this setting has been a challenge.

The authors propose the Kullback-Leibler Maillard Sampling (KL-MS) algorithm, a natural extension of the Maillard sampling method, to achieve a KL-style gap-dependent regret bound. Maillard sampling is an attractive alternative to Thompson sampling that has been shown to achieve competitive regret guarantees in the sub-Gaussian reward setting [bian2022maillard] while maintaining closed-form action probabilities, which is useful for offline policy evaluation.

The authors show that KL-MS enjoys asymptotic optimality when the rewards are Bernoulli and has a worst-case regret bound of the form O(sqrt(μ*(1-μ*) K T ln K) + K ln T), where μ* is the expected reward of the optimal arm, and T is the time horizon length. This bound is in the same form as the optimal regret bound for limited adaptivity in generalized linear contextual bandits, suggesting KL-MS is a near-optimal algorithm for the K-armed bandit problem with Bernoulli rewards.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel algorithm, KL-MS, that extends the Maillard sampling method to achieve a KL-style gap-dependent regret bound in K-armed bandit problems with rewards supported on the [0,1] interval. The authors show that KL-MS is asymptotically optimal for Bernoulli rewards and provide a tight regret bound.

One limitation of the work is that it focuses primarily on the theoretical analysis and does not include any empirical evaluation or comparison with other state-of-the-art algorithms, such as Thompson sampling or distributed no-regret learning in multi-stage systems. Empirical validation would be useful to understand the practical performance of KL-MS and its advantages over existing methods.

Additionally, the paper does not discuss the computational complexity of KL-MS or provide any insights into its implementation. Understanding the algorithm's practical efficiency and scalability would be important for real-world applications.

Overall, the paper makes a theoretical contribution by proposing a new algorithm with strong regret guarantees. However, further empirical and computational analysis would be valuable to fully assess the merits and limitations of KL-MS in comparison to other state-of-the-art bandit algorithms.

Conclusion

The paper introduces the Kullback-Leibler Maillard Sampling (KL-MS) algorithm, an extension of the Maillard sampling method, for solving K-armed bandit problems with rewards supported on the [0,1] interval. The authors show that KL-MS achieves asymptotic optimality for Bernoulli rewards and has a tight worst-case regret bound.

This work contributes to the ongoing effort to design efficient exploration algorithms for multi-armed bandit problems, which have important applications in fields like online decision-making, recommendation systems, and reinforcement learning. The theoretical analysis of KL-MS suggests it is a promising approach for balancing exploration and exploitation in these types of sequential decision-making scenarios.

While further empirical validation and computational analysis would be valuable, the paper's theoretical results demonstrate the potential of KL-MS to serve as an effective and principled solution for addressing the challenges of regret-efficient exploration in K-armed bandit problems.