Large Language Model as an Assignment Evaluator: Insights, Feedback, and Challenges in a 1000+ Student Course
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) as assignment evaluators in a course with over 1,000 students.
- The researchers investigated the feasibility, insights, and challenges of using LLMs to provide feedback on student assignments.
- The study was conducted in a real-world educational setting, providing valuable insights into the practical applications of LLMs in the classroom.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines the use of advanced AI language models, known as large language models (LLMs), to assess and provide feedback on student assignments in a large university course. Large language models are state-of-the-art AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text.
The researchers wanted to see if these powerful AI models could be effectively used to evaluate student work and provide meaningful feedback, which could help open-source language models provide feedback at scale. This is particularly important in large courses with hundreds or even thousands of students, where manually grading every assignment can be a significant challenge for instructors.
The study was conducted in a real-world educational setting, with over 1,000 students participating. This allowed the researchers to gather practical insights and understand the challenges of using LLMs as large language model partners in student essay writing.
The findings of the research could have important implications for the use of AI-powered tools in education, potentially helping large language models make the grade by assisting instructors and providing valuable feedback to students.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a study to investigate the use of large language models (LLMs) as assignment evaluators in a large university course with over 1,000 students. They sought to understand the feasibility, insights, and challenges of employing these powerful AI systems to provide feedback on student work.
The study was carried out in a real-world educational setting, allowing the researchers to gather practical insights and identify the challenges of using LLMs in this context. The researchers utilized state-of-the-art LLMs, which are known for their ability to understand and generate human-like text, to assess student assignments and provide feedback.
The researchers explored the potential for open-source language models to provide feedback at scale, which could be particularly beneficial in large courses where manual grading is a significant challenge for instructors. The study also examined the use of LLMs as partners in student essay writing and the ability of these models to make the grade in educational settings.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into the practical application of large language models in educational settings. The researchers' decision to conduct the study in a real-world course with over 1,000 students adds to the credibility and relevance of the findings.
However, the paper does not fully address the potential limitations and challenges of using LLMs as assignment evaluators. For example, the researchers do not delve into the potential biases or inconsistencies that may arise from the LLM's assessment, nor do they discuss the implications for student learning and engagement.
Additionally, the paper could have explored the ethical considerations of using AI-powered tools in educational evaluation, such as the potential for bias, lack of transparency, and the impact on student privacy and autonomy.
Further research is needed to address these concerns and to investigate the long-term effects of integrating LLMs into the educational process. This could involve conducting larger-scale studies or longitudinal analyses to better understand the impact of these technologies on student outcomes and the educational ecosystem as a whole.
Conclusion
This paper presents a compelling exploration of the use of large language models (LLMs) as assignment evaluators in a large university course. The researchers' findings suggest that LLMs can be a valuable tool in educational settings, potentially helping to alleviate the burden of manual grading and providing meaningful feedback to students.
However, the study also highlights the need for further research to address the potential limitations and challenges of using LLMs in educational contexts. Continued exploration of this topic could lead to important insights and advancements in the integration of AI-powered tools in the classroom, ultimately benefiting both students and instructors.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Large Language Model as an Assignment Evaluator: Insights, Feedback, and Challenges in a 1000+ Student Course
Cheng-Han Chiang, Wei-Chih Chen, Chun-Yi Kuan, Chienchou Yang, Hung-yi Lee
Using large language models (LLMs) for automatic evaluation has become an important evaluation method in NLP research. However, it is unclear whether these LLM-based evaluators can be applied in real-world classrooms to assess student assignments. This empirical report shares how we use GPT-4 as an automatic assignment evaluator in a university course with 1,028 students. Based on student responses, we find that LLM-based assignment evaluators are generally acceptable to students when students have free access to these LLM-based evaluators. However, students also noted that the LLM sometimes fails to adhere to the evaluation instructions. Additionally, we observe that students can easily manipulate the LLM-based evaluator to output specific strings, allowing them to achieve high scores without meeting the assignment rubric. Based on student feedback and our experience, we provide several recommendations for integrating LLM-based evaluators into future classrooms.
Read more7/9/2024
💬
0
From Text to Insight: Leveraging Large Language Models for Performance Evaluation in Management
Ning Li, Huaikang Zhou, Mingze Xu
This study explores the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically GPT-4, to enhance objectivity in organizational task performance evaluations. Through comparative analyses across two studies, including various task performance outputs, we demonstrate that LLMs can serve as a reliable and even superior alternative to human raters in evaluating knowledge-based performance outputs, which are a key contribution of knowledge workers. Our results suggest that GPT ratings are comparable to human ratings but exhibit higher consistency and reliability. Additionally, combined multiple GPT ratings on the same performance output show strong correlations with aggregated human performance ratings, akin to the consensus principle observed in performance evaluation literature. However, we also find that LLMs are prone to contextual biases, such as the halo effect, mirroring human evaluative biases. Our research suggests that while LLMs are capable of extracting meaningful constructs from text-based data, their scope is currently limited to specific forms of performance evaluation. By highlighting both the potential and limitations of LLMs, our study contributes to the discourse on AI role in management studies and sets a foundation for future research to refine AI theoretical and practical applications in management.
Read more8/13/2024
💬
0
Large Language Models as Partners in Student Essay Evaluation
Toru Ishida, Tongxi Liu, Hailong Wang, William K. Cheung
As the importance of comprehensive evaluation in workshop courses increases, there is a growing demand for efficient and fair assessment methods that reduce the workload for faculty members. This paper presents an evaluation conducted with Large Language Models (LLMs) using actual student essays in three scenarios: 1) without providing guidance such as rubrics, 2) with pre-specified rubrics, and 3) through pairwise comparison of essays. Quantitative analysis of the results revealed a strong correlation between LLM and faculty member assessments in the pairwise comparison scenario with pre-specified rubrics, although concerns about the quality and stability of evaluations remained. Therefore, we conducted a qualitative analysis of LLM assessment comments, showing that: 1) LLMs can match the assessment capabilities of faculty members, 2) variations in LLM assessments should be interpreted as diversity rather than confusion, and 3) assessments by humans and LLMs can differ and complement each other. In conclusion, this paper suggests that LLMs should not be seen merely as assistants to faculty members but as partners in evaluation committees and outlines directions for further research.
Read more5/30/2024
0
Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluator for Grammatical Error Correction
Masamune Kobayashi, Masato Mita, Mamoru Komachi
Large Language Models (LLMs) have been reported to outperform existing automatic evaluation metrics in some tasks, such as text summarization and machine translation. However, there has been a lack of research on LLMs as evaluators in grammatical error correction (GEC). In this study, we investigate the performance of LLMs in GEC evaluation by employing prompts designed to incorporate various evaluation criteria inspired by previous research. Our extensive experimental results demonstrate that GPT-4 achieved Kendall's rank correlation of 0.662 with human judgments, surpassing all existing methods. Furthermore, in recent GEC evaluations, we have underscored the significance of the LLMs scale and particularly emphasized the importance of fluency among evaluation criteria.
Read more5/28/2024