Large Language Models are In-context Teachers for Knowledge Reasoning

Overview

• This paper explores how large language models (LLMs) can be better "in-context teachers" for knowledge reasoning tasks, rather than relying on human-crafted demonstrations.
• The authors propose a method called "Self-Explain" that uses an LLM's own self-generated explanations as the in-context learning examples, based on the "encoding specificity" hypothesis.
• The paper also introduces "Teach-Back", which aligns the teaching LLM with the student LLM to further enhance the in-context teaching performance.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at how we can improve the way large language models (LLMs) are trained to reason and solve complex problems. Currently, humans have to create example demonstrations for the models to learn from, which is expensive and can be inconsistent.

The researchers had the idea to use the LLM's own self-generated explanations as the examples for in-context learning, rather than relying on human-made ones. This is based on the theory that the model will learn best from examples that match the way it was originally trained on data.

The "Self-Explain" method they developed shows this approach works significantly better than using human-crafted examples. The paper also found that teaching examples from other LLMs or human experts work best when they are similar to the student model's own self-explanations.

Building on this, the researchers created a "Teach-Back" method that aligns the teaching LLM with the student LLM, further boosting the in-context teaching performance. This even allows a smaller 7B model to teach a much larger GPT-3.5 model, outperforming human teachers on a medical question-answering task.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates whether LLMs can be better "in-context teachers" for knowledge reasoning tasks compared to relying on human-crafted demonstrations. The authors follow the "encoding specificity" hypothesis from human memory research, which suggests that in-context examples at inference should match the encoding context used during training.

They propose a method called "Self-Explain" that uses an LLM's own self-elicited explanations as the in-context learning demonstrations, as these are generalized from the model's training data. Experiments show Self-Explain significantly outperforms using human-crafted exemplars and other baselines.

The paper further reveals that for in-context teaching, rationales from different teacher LLMs or human experts that more resemble the student LLM's self-explanations are better demonstrations, supporting the encoding specificity hypothesis.

Building on this, the authors introduce "Teach-Back", which aligns the teaching LLM with the student LLM to enhance the in-context teaching performance. This enables a 7B model to teach the much larger GPT-3.5 model, surpassing human teachers by around 5% in test accuracy on a medical question-answering task.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to leveraging LLMs' own self-generated knowledge as a more effective way to provide in-context learning examples, as opposed to relying on human-crafted demonstrations.

One potential limitation is that the encoding specificity hypothesis, while supported by the results, may not fully explain all the dynamics at play. There could be other factors influencing the effectiveness of different teaching examples beyond just their similarity to the student's own reasoning.

Additionally, the Teach-Back method, while effective, relies on aligning the teaching and student models. This alignment process may be challenging to scale or generalize to arbitrary model pairings. Further research is needed to understand the broader applicability and potential issues with this approach.

Another area for exploration is how the self-explanations used as in-context examples are generated. The paper does not delve into details on this process, and there may be opportunities to further optimize or personalize the self-explanation generation to enhance the teaching effectiveness.

Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution by demonstrating the potential of leveraging LLMs' own internal knowledge representations for more effective in-context learning. The findings and proposed methods warrant further investigation and refinement to unlock the full potential of this approach.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach to improving in-context learning for large language models, moving away from reliance on human-crafted demonstrations. The key idea is to use the LLM's own self-generated explanations as the in-context learning examples, based on the encoding specificity hypothesis.

The authors show that this "Self-Explain" method significantly outperforms using human-made exemplars, and that in-context teaching is most effective when the rationales match the student LLM's own self-explanations. They further develop a "Teach-Back" technique to align the teaching and student models, enabling a smaller 7B model to surpass human teachers on a medical question-answering task.

These findings have important implications for making large language models more capable of reasoning and knowledge transfer, reducing the need for costly human involvement. The proposed approaches warrant further exploration and refinement to unlock the full potential of LLMs as self-teaching, generative AI systems.