Large Language Models as Reliable Knowledge Bases?

Read original: arXiv:2407.13578 - Published 7/19/2024 by Danna Zheng, Mirella Lapata, Jeff Z. Pan
Total Score

0

Large Language Models as Reliable Knowledge Bases?

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the potential of large language models (LLMs) to serve as reliable knowledge bases (KBs) for a variety of applications.
  • The authors investigate the extent to which LLMs can accurately represent and reason about factual knowledge, as well as the challenges and limitations of this approach.
  • The paper covers topics such as how proficient are large language models at formal reasoning?, combining knowledge graphs and large language models, and using LLMs to enhance knowledge representation learning.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are a type of artificial intelligence that have become incredibly capable at understanding and generating human-like text. Researchers are now exploring whether these LLMs could also serve as reliable knowledge bases (KBs) - essentially, databases of factual information that can be queried and used in various applications.

The key idea is that LLMs, through their training on vast amounts of text data, may have absorbed a significant amount of factual knowledge that could be leveraged. For example, an LLM might be able to answer questions about history, science, or current events with a high degree of accuracy.

However, there are also concerns about the reliability of knowledge stored in LLMs. Unlike traditional KBs that are manually curated, the information in LLMs is learned from unstructured text, which means it may contain biases, inconsistencies, or factual errors. The paper examines these challenges and explores ways to improve the understanding of knowledge in large language models.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by defining what constitutes a "reliable" LLM-as-KB, which includes factors such as accuracy, consistency, and the ability to reason about the underlying knowledge. The authors then review various approaches to leveraging LLMs for knowledge representation and reasoning, including:

  1. Combining Knowledge Graphs and LLMs: Integrating structured knowledge graphs with the unstructured knowledge in LLMs to improve the overall knowledge representation.
  2. LLM-Enhanced Knowledge Representation Learning: Using LLMs to enhance the learning of knowledge representations, such as by providing additional context or guidance during the training process.
  3. Evaluating LLM Capabilities for Formal Reasoning: Assessing the ability of LLMs to perform formal logical reasoning, which is a key requirement for reliable knowledge-based applications.

The paper also discusses the challenges and limitations of using LLMs as knowledge bases, such as the potential for biases, inconsistencies, and factual errors in the underlying knowledge.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the potential and challenges of using LLMs as reliable knowledge bases. It acknowledges that while LLMs have shown impressive performance on a wide range of tasks, there are still significant hurdles to overcome before they can be considered truly reliable sources of factual information.

One key limitation highlighted in the paper is the difficulty in understanding and explaining the internal representations and reasoning processes of LLMs. This "black box" nature makes it challenging to audit and validate the knowledge stored within these models, which is a critical requirement for many real-world applications.

The paper also points out that the unstructured nature of the knowledge in LLMs can lead to biases, inconsistencies, and factual errors - issues that are not easily addressed through traditional knowledge curation methods. Improving the understanding of knowledge in large language models is an active area of research that may help address these concerns.

Overall, the paper provides a balanced and well-reasoned assessment of the current state of LLMs as knowledge bases, highlighting both their potential and their limitations. It encourages readers to think critically about the use of these models in knowledge-intensive applications and to consider the trade-offs and risks involved.

Conclusion

This paper highlights the significant potential of large language models (LLMs) to serve as reliable knowledge bases, but also identifies several key challenges that must be addressed before they can be widely adopted for this purpose.

The authors explore various approaches to leveraging LLMs for knowledge representation and reasoning, such as combining them with structured knowledge graphs and using them to enhance knowledge representation learning. However, they also emphasize the importance of accurately understanding the internal representations and reasoning processes of these models, as well as addressing issues of bias, inconsistency, and factual errors in the underlying knowledge.

Overall, the paper provides a nuanced and thought-provoking perspective on the role of LLMs as knowledge bases, encouraging readers to carefully consider the trade-offs and limitations of this emerging technology. As the field of AI continues to evolve, the insights and considerations raised in this paper will likely become increasingly relevant for a wide range of knowledge-intensive applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Large Language Models as Reliable Knowledge Bases?
Total Score

0

Large Language Models as Reliable Knowledge Bases?

Danna Zheng, Mirella Lapata, Jeff Z. Pan

The NLP community has recently shown a growing interest in leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) for knowledge-intensive tasks, viewing LLMs as potential knowledge bases (KBs). However, the reliability and extent to which LLMs can function as KBs remain underexplored. While previous studies suggest LLMs can encode knowledge within their parameters, the amount of parametric knowledge alone is not sufficient to evaluate their effectiveness as KBs. This study defines criteria that a reliable LLM-as-KB should meet, focusing on factuality and consistency, and covering both seen and unseen knowledge. We develop several metrics based on these criteria and use them to evaluate 26 popular LLMs, while providing a comprehensive analysis of the effects of model size, instruction tuning, and in-context learning (ICL). Our results paint a worrying picture. Even a high-performant model like GPT-3.5-turbo is not factual or consistent, and strategies like ICL and fine-tuning are unsuccessful at making LLMs better KBs.

Read more

7/19/2024

Large Knowledge Model: Perspectives and Challenges
Total Score

0

Large Knowledge Model: Perspectives and Challenges

Huajun Chen

Humankind's understanding of the world is fundamentally linked to our perception and cognition, with emph{human languages} serving as one of the major carriers of emph{world knowledge}. In this vein, emph{Large Language Models} (LLMs) like ChatGPT epitomize the pre-training of extensive, sequence-based world knowledge into neural networks, facilitating the processing and manipulation of this knowledge in a parametric space. This article explores large models through the lens of knowledge. We initially investigate the role of symbolic knowledge such as Knowledge Graphs (KGs) in enhancing LLMs, covering aspects like knowledge-augmented language model, structure-inducing pre-training, knowledgeable prompts, structured CoT, knowledge editing, semantic tools for LLM and knowledgeable AI agents. Subsequently, we examine how LLMs can boost traditional symbolic knowledge bases, encompassing aspects like using LLM as KG builder and controller, structured knowledge pretraining, and LLM-enhanced symbolic reasoning. Considering the intricate nature of human knowledge, we advocate for the creation of emph{Large Knowledge Models} (LKM), specifically engineered to manage diversified spectrum of knowledge structures. This promising undertaking would entail several key challenges, such as disentangling knowledge base from language models, cognitive alignment with human knowledge, integration of perception and cognition, and building large commonsense models for interacting with physical world, among others. We finally propose a five-A principle to distinguish the concept of LKM.

Read more

6/27/2024

Large Language Model Enhanced Knowledge Representation Learning: A Survey
Total Score

0

Large Language Model Enhanced Knowledge Representation Learning: A Survey

Xin Wang, Zirui Chen, Haofen Wang, Leong Hou U, Zhao Li, Wenbin Guo

The integration of Large Language Models (LLM) with Knowledge Representation Learning (KRL) signifies a significant advancement in the field of artificial intelligence (AI), enhancing the ability to capture and utilize both structure and textual information. Despite the increasing research on enhancing KRL with LLMs, a thorough survey that analyse processes of these enhanced models is conspicuously absent. Our survey addresses this by categorizing these models based on three distinct Transformer architectures, and by analyzing experimental data from various KRL downstream tasks to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. Finally, we identify and explore potential future research directions in this emerging yet underexplored domain.

Read more

7/19/2024

💬

Total Score

0

A Perspective on Large Language Models, Intelligent Machines, and Knowledge Acquisition

Vladimir Cherkassky, Eng Hock Lee

Large Language Models (LLMs) are known for their remarkable ability to generate synthesized 'knowledge', such as text documents, music, images, etc. However, there is a huge gap between LLM's and human capabilities for understanding abstract concepts and reasoning. We discuss these issues in a larger philosophical context of human knowledge acquisition and the Turing test. In addition, we illustrate the limitations of LLMs by analyzing GPT-4 responses to questions ranging from science and math to common sense reasoning. These examples show that GPT-4 can often imitate human reasoning, even though it lacks understanding. However, LLM responses are synthesized from a large LLM model trained on all available data. In contrast, human understanding is based on a small number of abstract concepts. Based on this distinction, we discuss the impact of LLMs on acquisition of human knowledge and education.

Read more

8/14/2024