Large Neighborhood Prioritized Search for Combinatorial Optimization with Answer Set Programming

Read original: arXiv:2405.11305 - Published 5/21/2024 by Irumi Sugimori, Katsumi Inoue, Hidetomo Nabeshima, Torsten Schaub, Takehide Soh, Naoyuki Tamura, Mutsunori Banbara
Total Score

0

🛠️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a new method for solving complex combinatorial optimization problems using Answer Set Programming (ASP) and Large Neighborhood Search (LNS).
  • The authors propose a "Large Neighborhood Prioritized Search" (LNPS) approach that leverages the strengths of ASP and LNS to efficiently explore large neighborhoods and find high-quality solutions.
  • The method is evaluated on several challenging optimization problems, including the Online Control and Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search and the Traveling Salesman Problem with Dubins Constraints.

Plain English Explanation

The paper tackles the challenge of solving complex combinatorial optimization problems, which involve finding the best solution from a vast number of possible options. These problems arise in a wide range of real-world scenarios, such as scheduling, route planning, and multi-agent coordination.

The authors' approach combines two powerful techniques: Answer Set Programming (ASP) and Large Neighborhood Search (LNS). ASP is a declarative programming paradigm that allows for the efficient modeling and solving of complex problems. LNS, on the other hand, is a heuristic method that explores large regions of the search space to find high-quality solutions.

The key innovation of the paper is the "Large Neighborhood Prioritized Search" (LNPS) method, which leverages the strengths of both ASP and LNS. LNPS systematically explores large neighborhoods of potential solutions, prioritizing those that are most promising based on the insights provided by the ASP model. This allows the algorithm to efficiently navigate the vast search space and identify high-quality solutions.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several challenging optimization problems, showcasing its ability to outperform existing methods in terms of solution quality and computational efficiency.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the "Large Neighborhood Prioritized Search" (LNPS) algorithm, which combines the strengths of Answer Set Programming (ASP) and Large Neighborhood Search (LNS) to solve complex combinatorial optimization problems.

The LNPS algorithm works as follows:

  1. The problem is modeled using ASP, which provides a concise and flexible way to represent the constraints and objectives of the optimization problem.
  2. The LNS component of the algorithm then explores large neighborhoods of potential solutions, guided by the insights provided by the ASP model.
  3. The algorithm prioritizes the exploration of neighborhoods that are most likely to contain high-quality solutions, based on the information encoded in the ASP model.
  4. This prioritized search allows the algorithm to efficiently navigate the vast search space and identify solutions that meet the problem's constraints and optimize the desired objectives.

The authors evaluate the LNPS algorithm on several benchmark optimization problems, including the Online Control and Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search and the Traveling Salesman Problem with Dubins Constraints. The results demonstrate that LNPS outperforms existing methods in terms of solution quality and computational efficiency.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach for solving complex combinatorial optimization problems, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research.

One potential limitation is the reliance on the ASP model to guide the LNS search. While the authors show that this approach is effective, the performance of the algorithm may be sensitive to the quality and accuracy of the ASP model. Further research could explore ways to make the LNPS algorithm more robust to potential inaccuracies or biases in the ASP model.

Additionally, the paper focuses on a relatively small set of benchmark problems, and it would be valuable to see the LNPS algorithm applied to a wider range of real-world optimization challenges. This could help identify any limitations or additional challenges that may arise in more complex or diverse problem domains.

Finally, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the computational complexity of the LNPS algorithm, which could be an important consideration for its practical application. Future research could explore ways to further optimize the algorithm's efficiency and scalability.

Conclusion

The "Large Neighborhood Prioritized Search" (LNPS) algorithm presented in this paper offers a promising approach for solving complex combinatorial optimization problems. By combining the strengths of Answer Set Programming and Large Neighborhood Search, the LNPS method is able to efficiently explore large regions of the search space and identify high-quality solutions.

The authors' results demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach on several benchmark optimization problems, suggesting that LNPS could be a valuable tool for tackling a wide range of real-world optimization challenges. While the paper acknowledges some limitations and areas for further research, the overall contribution of this work is significant and could have important implications for the field of combinatorial optimization.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🛠️

Total Score

0

Large Neighborhood Prioritized Search for Combinatorial Optimization with Answer Set Programming

Irumi Sugimori, Katsumi Inoue, Hidetomo Nabeshima, Torsten Schaub, Takehide Soh, Naoyuki Tamura, Mutsunori Banbara

We propose Large Neighborhood Prioritized Search (LNPS) for solving combinatorial optimization problems in Answer Set Programming (ASP). LNPS is a metaheuristic that starts with an initial solution and then iteratively tries to find better solutions by alternately destroying and prioritized searching for a current solution. Due to the variability of neighborhoods, LNPS allows for flexible search without strongly depending on the destroy operators. We present an implementation of LNPS based on ASP. The resulting heulingo solver demonstrates that LNPS can significantly enhance the solving performance of ASP for optimization. Furthermore, we establish the competitiveness of our LNPS approach by empirically contrasting it to (adaptive) large neighborhood search.

Read more

5/21/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Online Control of Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search using Deep Reinforcement Learning

Robbert Reijnen, Yingqian Zhang, Hoong Chuin Lau, Zaharah Bukhsh

The Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search (ALNS) algorithm has shown considerable success in solving combinatorial optimization problems (COPs). Nonetheless, the performance of ALNS relies on the proper configuration of its selection and acceptance parameters, which is known to be a complex and resource-intensive task. To address this, we introduce a Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) based approach called DR-ALNS that selects operators, adjusts parameters, and controls the acceptance criterion throughout the search. The proposed method aims to learn, based on the state of the search, to configure ALNS for the next iteration to yield more effective solutions for the given optimization problem. We evaluate the proposed method on an orienteering problem with stochastic weights and time windows, as presented in an IJCAI competition. The results show that our approach outperforms vanilla ALNS, ALNS tuned with Bayesian optimization, and two state-of-the-art DRL approaches that were the winning methods of the competition, achieving this with significantly fewer training observations. Furthermore, we demonstrate several good properties of the proposed DR-ALNS method: it is easily adapted to solve different routing problems, its learned policies perform consistently well across various instance sizes, and these policies can be directly applied to different problem variants.

Read more

4/4/2024

Optimising Dynamic Traffic Distribution for Urban Networks with Answer Set Programming
Total Score

0

Optimising Dynamic Traffic Distribution for Urban Networks with Answer Set Programming

Matteo Cardellini, Carmine Dodaro, Marco Maratea, Mauro Vallati

Answer Set Programming (ASP) has demonstrated its potential as an effective tool for concisely representing and reasoning about real-world problems. In this paper, we present an application in which ASP has been successfully used in the context of dynamic traffic distribution for urban networks, within a more general framework devised for solving such a real-world problem. In particular, ASP has been employed for the computation of the optimal routes for all the vehicles in the network. We also provide an empirical analysis of the performance of the whole framework, and of its part in which ASP is employed, on two European urban areas, which shows the viability of the framework and the contribution ASP can give.

Read more

8/15/2024

⚙️

Total Score

0

Investigating Constraint Programming and Hybrid Methods for Real World Industrial Test Laboratory Scheduling

Tobias Geibinger, Florian Mischek, Nysret Musliu

In this paper we deal with a complex real world scheduling problem closely related to the well-known Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem (RCPSP). The problem concerns industrial test laboratories in which a large number of tests has to be performed by qualified personnel using specialised equipment, while respecting deadlines and other constraints. We present different constraint programming models and search strategies for this problem. Furthermore, we propose a Very Large Neighborhood Search approach based on our CP methods. Our models are evaluated using CP solvers and a MIP solver both on real-world test laboratory data and on a set of generated instances of different sizes based on the real-world data. Further, we compare the exact approaches with VLNS and a Simulated Annealing heuristic. We could find feasible solutions for all instances and several optimal solutions and we show that using VLNS we can improve upon the results of the other approaches.

Read more

8/16/2024