A Perspective Study on Chinese Social Media regarding LLM for Education and Beyond

Read original: arXiv:2306.04325 - Published 8/13/2024 by Yao Tian, Chengwei Tong, Lik-Hang Lee, Reza Hadi Mogavi, Yong Liao, Pengyuan Zhou
Total Score

0

🏋️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This study examines how the Chinese public perceives the potential of large language models (LLMs), using ChatGPT as a representative example.
  • It explores the public's attitudes towards advanced AI technologies, particularly in the context of education and general applications.
  • The study serves as the first effort to investigate the changes in public opinion as AI technologies become more advanced and intelligent.

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores how people in China are reacting to the rise of powerful AI language models, like ChatGPT. The researchers focused on ChatGPT because it is currently the most popular and capable AI tool of its kind, even more so than similar products developed in China, such as Ernie Bot.

The study looked at what people on social media think about using advanced AI systems like ChatGPT for things like education and everyday tasks. At first, some people were excited about the potential benefits, while others worried that AI would make humans feel inferior and lead to problems like cheating or a decline in moral standards. Over time, as the AI capabilities have improved, public attitudes have generally become more positive.

The researchers provide a detailed analysis of this shift in public opinion and offer suggestions to ensure these powerful AI models, like ChatGPT, are used ethically in education and other areas.

Technical Explanation

The researchers used social media data to analyze public perceptions of ChatGPT, which they chose as a representative example of advanced LLMs. They found that the monthly discussion volume on ChatGPT was 16 times higher than for Ernie Bot, the most popular alternative in mainland China, making ChatGPT a more suitable subject for their analysis.

The study examined how public attitudes changed as ChatGPT and similar AI technologies became more sophisticated. Initially, some social media users believed AI advancements would benefit education and society, while others feared AI would make humans feel inferior and lead to issues like cheating and moral decline. However, the researchers observed a positive shift in public opinion as the AI capabilities rapidly improved.

The paper presents a thorough analysis of this trending shift in public perception and proposes a roadmap to ensure the ethical application of ChatGPT-like models in education and beyond, drawing on the insights from prior research on the use of AI in education.

Critical Analysis

The study provides valuable insights into the evolving public perceptions of advanced AI technologies, particularly in the context of educational applications. However, the paper does not delve into the potential limitations or biases inherent in social media data, which could influence the findings.

Additionally, the researchers focus primarily on the Chinese public's views, so the global perspective may not be fully represented. Further research could explore how perceptions vary across different cultural and sociopolitical contexts.

Conclusion

This study offers a nuanced understanding of how the public's perception of advanced AI models, like ChatGPT, has evolved over time. The researchers provide a comprehensive analysis of the shifting attitudes and propose a framework to ensure the ethical integration of these powerful technologies in education and other domains. As AI capabilities continue to advance, ongoing public discourse and critical evaluation will be crucial to shape the responsible development and deployment of these transformative tools.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🏋️

Total Score

0

A Perspective Study on Chinese Social Media regarding LLM for Education and Beyond

Yao Tian, Chengwei Tong, Lik-Hang Lee, Reza Hadi Mogavi, Yong Liao, Pengyuan Zhou

The application of AI-powered tools has piqued the interest of many fields, particularly in the academic community. This study uses ChatGPT, currently the most powerful and popular AI tool, as a representative example to analyze how the Chinese public perceives the potential of large language models (LLMs) for educational and general purposes. Although facing accessibility challenges, we found that the number of discussions on ChatGPT per month is 16 times that of Ernie Bot developed by Baidu, the most popular alternative product to ChatGPT in the mainland, making ChatGPT a more suitable subject for our analysis. The study also serves as the first effort to investigate the changes in public opinion as AI technologies become more advanced and intelligent. The analysis reveals that, upon first encounters with advanced AI that was not yet highly capable, some social media users believed that AI advancements would benefit education and society, while others feared that advanced AI, like ChatGPT, would make humans feel inferior and lead to problems such as cheating and a decline in moral principles. The majority of users remained neutral. Interestingly, with the rapid development and improvement of AI capabilities, public attitudes have tended to shift in a positive direction. We present a thorough analysis of the trending shift and a roadmap to ensure the ethical application of ChatGPT-like models in education and beyond.

Read more

8/13/2024

💬

Total Score

0

The Future of Learning: Large Language Models through the Lens of Students

He Zhang, Jingyi Xie, Chuhao Wu, Jie Cai, ChanMin Kim, John M. Carroll

As Large-Scale Language Models (LLMs) continue to evolve, they demonstrate significant enhancements in performance and an expansion of functionalities, impacting various domains, including education. In this study, we conducted interviews with 14 students to explore their everyday interactions with ChatGPT. Our preliminary findings reveal that students grapple with the dilemma of utilizing ChatGPT's efficiency for learning and information seeking, while simultaneously experiencing a crisis of trust and ethical concerns regarding the outcomes and broader impacts of ChatGPT. The students perceive ChatGPT as being more human-like compared to traditional AI. This dilemma, characterized by mixed emotions, inconsistent behaviors, and an overall positive attitude towards ChatGPT, underscores its potential for beneficial applications in education and learning. However, we argue that despite its human-like qualities, the advanced capabilities of such intelligence might lead to adverse consequences. Therefore, it's imperative to approach its application cautiously and strive to mitigate potential harms in future developments.

Read more

7/18/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Potential Societal Biases of ChatGPT in Higher Education: A Scoping Review

Ming Li, Ariunaa Enkhtur, Beverley Anne Yamamoto, Fei Cheng, Lilan Chen

Purpose:Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) models, such as ChatGPT, may inherit or amplify societal biases due to their training on extensive datasets. With the increasing usage of GAI by students, faculty, and staff in higher education institutions (HEIs), it is urgent to examine the ethical issues and potential biases associated with these technologies. Design/Approach/Methods:This scoping review aims to elucidate how biases related to GAI in HEIs have been researched and discussed in recent academic publications. We categorized the potential societal biases that GAI might cause in the field of higher education. Our review includes articles written in English, Chinese, and Japanese across four main databases, focusing on GAI usage in higher education and bias. Findings:Our findings reveal that while there is meaningful scholarly discussion around bias and discrimination concerning LLMs in the AI field, most articles addressing higher education approach the issue superficially. Few articles identify specific types of bias under different circumstances, and there is a notable lack of empirical research. Most papers in our review focus primarily on educational and research fields related to medicine and engineering, with some addressing English education. However, there is almost no discussion regarding the humanities and social sciences. Additionally, a significant portion of the current discourse is in English and primarily addresses English-speaking contexts. Originality/Value:To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to summarize the potential societal biases in higher education. This review highlights the need for more in-depth studies and empirical work to understand the specific biases that GAI might introduce or amplify in educational settings, guiding the development of more ethical AI applications in higher education.

Read more

7/12/2024

🌐

Total Score

0

ChatGPT Is Here to Help, Not to Replace Anybody -- An Evaluation of Students' Opinions On Integrating ChatGPT In CS Courses

Bruno Pereira Cipriano, Pedro Alves

Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT and Bard are capable of producing code based on textual descriptions, with remarkable efficacy. Such technology will have profound implications for computing education, raising concerns about cheating, excessive dependence, and a decline in computational thinking skills, among others. There has been extensive research on how teachers should handle this challenge but it is also important to understand how students feel about this paradigm shift. In this research, 52 first-year CS students were surveyed in order to assess their views on technologies with code-generation capabilities, both from academic and professional perspectives. Our findings indicate that while students generally favor the academic use of GPT, they don't over rely on it, only mildly asking for its help. Although most students benefit from GPT, some struggle to use it effectively, urging the need for specific GPT training. Opinions on GPT's impact on their professional lives vary, but there is a consensus on its importance in academic practice.

Read more

4/29/2024