A Latent-Variable Model for Intrinsic Probing
0
📈
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how pre-trained language models encode linguistic knowledge, with a focus on using "intrinsic probing" to identify where specific linguistic attributes are encoded in the model.
- The researchers propose a novel latent-variable formulation for constructing intrinsic probes, which they show yields tighter estimates of mutual information than previous methods.
- The findings suggest that pre-trained representations develop a cross-lingually entangled notion of morphosyntax, providing insight into the inner workings of these powerful models.
Plain English Explanation
The success of pre-trained language models like BERT and GPT has led researchers to investigate what linguistic knowledge these models have learned. It's natural to assume they encode some level of linguistic understanding, since they perform so well on a wide variety of language tasks.
The researchers in this paper used a technique called "intrinsic probing" to try to pinpoint exactly where in the model's internal representations certain linguistic attributes, like grammar and sentence structure, are encoded. This is valuable because it can help us understand how these models work under the hood and what kind of linguistic knowledge they are capturing.
The researchers developed a new, more sophisticated intrinsic probing method, which they show produces better results than previous approaches. Their findings suggest that pre-trained models develop a cross-lingual understanding of morphology and syntax - in other words, they learn linguistic concepts that apply across different languages.
Technical Explanation
The researchers focus on "intrinsic probing", an analysis technique where the goal is to not only identify whether a representation encodes a linguistic attribute, but also to determine where that attribute is encoded within the representation.
They propose a novel latent-variable formulation for constructing intrinsic probes, which allows them to derive a tractable variational approximation to the log-likelihood. This formulation is more flexible and yields tighter mutual information estimates than previous intrinsic probing methods proposed in the literature, such as INLP and SVCCA.
The experiments reveal that pre-trained representations develop a cross-lingually entangled notion of morphosyntax. This suggests that these models are learning true linguistic generalization, rather than simply memorizing surface-level patterns.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a valuable contribution by introducing a new intrinsic probing method and using it to gain insights into the linguistic knowledge captured by pre-trained language models. However, as with any research, there are some caveats and limitations to consider.
One potential issue is the reliance on specific probing tasks and linguistic attributes. The findings are limited to the particular aspects of language that were examined, and it's possible that other linguistic phenomena may be encoded differently within the models.
Additionally, the paper does not address how the discovered linguistic knowledge is actually used by the models to perform downstream language tasks. Further research is needed to understand the functional role of the encoded linguistic representations.
It would also be interesting to see how the proposed intrinsic probing method performs on a wider range of pre-trained models, including non-transformer architectures like ELIZA. This could help validate the generalizability of the findings.
Conclusion
This paper presents an innovative approach to studying the internal representations of pre-trained language models, with a focus on uncovering the linguistic knowledge they have acquired. The researchers' novel intrinsic probing method provides tighter estimates of mutual information, leading to the discovery that these models develop a cross-lingually entangled understanding of morphology and syntax.
These insights contribute to our broader understanding of how large language models work and what kind of linguistic generalization they are capable of. This knowledge could inform the development of more interpretable and robust natural language processing systems, with potential applications in areas like machine translation, text generation, and language understanding.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📈
0
A Latent-Variable Model for Intrinsic Probing
Karolina Sta'nczak, Lucas Torroba Hennigen, Adina Williams, Ryan Cotterell, Isabelle Augenstein
The success of pre-trained contextualized representations has prompted researchers to analyze them for the presence of linguistic information. Indeed, it is natural to assume that these pre-trained representations do encode some level of linguistic knowledge as they have brought about large empirical improvements on a wide variety of NLP tasks, which suggests they are learning true linguistic generalization. In this work, we focus on intrinsic probing, an analysis technique where the goal is not only to identify whether a representation encodes a linguistic attribute but also to pinpoint where this attribute is encoded. We propose a novel latent-variable formulation for constructing intrinsic probes and derive a tractable variational approximation to the log-likelihood. Our results show that our model is versatile and yields tighter mutual information estimates than two intrinsic probes previously proposed in the literature. Finally, we find empirical evidence that pre-trained representations develop a cross-lingually entangled notion of morphosyntax.
Read more7/12/2024
0
Latent Causal Probing: A Formal Perspective on Probing with Causal Models of Data
Charles Jin, Martin Rinard
As language models (LMs) deliver increasing performance on a range of NLP tasks, probing classifiers have become an indispensable technique in the effort to better understand their inner workings. A typical setup involves (1) defining an auxiliary task consisting of a dataset of text annotated with labels, then (2) supervising small classifiers to predict the labels from the representations of a pretrained LM as it processed the dataset. A high probing accuracy is interpreted as evidence that the LM has learned to perform the auxiliary task as an unsupervised byproduct of its original pretraining objective. Despite the widespread usage of probes, however, the robust design and analysis of probing experiments remains a challenge. We develop a formal perspective on probing using structural causal models (SCM). Specifically, given an SCM which explains the distribution of tokens observed during training, we frame the central hypothesis as whether the LM has learned to represent the latent variables of the SCM. Empirically, we extend a recent study of LMs in the context of a synthetic grid-world navigation task, where having an exact model of the underlying causal structure allows us to draw strong inferences from the result of probing experiments. Our techniques provide robust empirical evidence for the ability of LMs to induce the latent concepts underlying text.
Read more8/1/2024
0
Monitoring Latent World States in Language Models with Propositional Probes
Jiahai Feng, Stuart Russell, Jacob Steinhardt
Language models are susceptible to bias, sycophancy, backdoors, and other tendencies that lead to unfaithful responses to the input context. Interpreting internal states of language models could help monitor and correct unfaithful behavior. We hypothesize that language models represent their input contexts in a latent world model, and seek to extract this latent world state from the activations. We do so with 'propositional probes', which compositionally probe tokens for lexical information and bind them into logical propositions representing the world state. For example, given the input context ''Greg is a nurse. Laura is a physicist.'', we decode the propositions ''WorksAs(Greg, nurse)'' and ''WorksAs(Laura, physicist)'' from the model's activations. Key to this is identifying a 'binding subspace' in which bound tokens have high similarity (''Greg'' and ''nurse'') but unbound ones do not (''Greg'' and ''physicist''). We validate propositional probes in a closed-world setting with finitely many predicates and properties. Despite being trained on simple templated contexts, propositional probes generalize to contexts rewritten as short stories and translated to Spanish. Moreover, we find that in three settings where language models respond unfaithfully to the input context -- prompt injections, backdoor attacks, and gender bias -- the decoded propositions remain faithful. This suggests that language models often encode a faithful world model but decode it unfaithfully, which motivates the search for better interpretability tools for monitoring LMs.
Read more7/1/2024
0
In-Context Probing Approximates Influence Function for Data Valuation
Cathy Jiao, Gary Gao, Chenyan Xiong
Data valuation quantifies the value of training data, and is used for data attribution (i.e., determining the contribution of training data towards model predictions), and data selection; both of which are important for curating high-quality datasets to train large language models. In our paper, we show that data valuation through in-context probing (i.e., prompting a LLM) approximates influence functions for selecting training data. We provide a theoretical sketch on this connection based on transformer models performing implicit gradient descent on its in-context inputs. Our empirical findings show that in-context probing and gradient-based influence frameworks are similar in how they rank training data. Furthermore, fine-tuning experiments on data selected by either method reveal similar model performance.
Read more7/18/2024