In-Context Probing Approximates Influence Function for Data Valuation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes an in-context probing method to approximate the influence function for data valuation.
- The influence function is a way to measure the importance of each data point in a machine learning model's performance.
- The authors show that their in-context probing method can provide a good approximation of the influence function, but with significantly less computational cost.
Plain English Explanation
When you train a machine learning model, each data point in the training set contributes to the model's performance in some way. The influence function is a way to measure how much each data point is "worth" to the model - in other words, how much its inclusion (or exclusion) affects the model's performance.
However, calculating the influence function can be computationally expensive, especially for large datasets. The authors of this paper introduce a new method called "in-context probing" that can approximate the influence function more efficiently.
The key idea is to not directly calculate the influence function, but instead probe the model's behavior in the "context" of each data point. By looking at how the model's outputs change when a data point is removed or perturbed, the authors can get a good sense of that data point's influence without needing to do the full influence function calculation.
This in-context probing approach can be especially useful for large-scale machine learning tasks, where the full influence function would be too computationally expensive to calculate. It provides a way to quickly identify the most influential data points without sacrificing too much accuracy.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes an "in-context probing" method to approximate the influence function for data valuation. The influence function measures how much each training data point contributes to a model's performance. Calculating the exact influence function can be computationally expensive, especially for large datasets.
The in-context probing approach works by analyzing how a model's outputs change when a data point is perturbed or removed from the training set. By probing the model's behavior in the "context" of each data point, the authors can get a good approximation of that data point's influence without needing to do the full influence function calculation.
Experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets show that the in-context probing method can provide a close approximation of the true influence function, but with significantly lower computational cost. The authors also demonstrate how this method can be used to select the most influential data points for model fine-tuning or data subset selection.
Critical Analysis
The in-context probing method proposed in this paper is a promising approach for efficiently approximating the influence function. By avoiding the need for the full influence function calculation, it can provide a practical solution for large-scale machine learning tasks.
However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations of the method. For example, the in-context probing approach may not capture all the nuances of the true influence function, and its accuracy could be impacted by factors like model architecture and data distribution.
Additionally, while the method is computationally more efficient than the full influence function calculation, it still requires additional forward and backward passes through the model for each data point. This could still be prohibitively expensive for truly massive datasets.
Further research could explore ways to make the in-context probing even more efficient, perhaps by finding ways to batch or parallelize the computations. Investigating the method's robustness to different model types and tasks would also be valuable.
Overall, the in-context probing approach presented in this paper is a useful contribution to the field of data valuation, providing a practical way to approximate the influence function without the full computational burden. As machine learning models continue to grow in scale and complexity, techniques like this will become increasingly important.
Conclusion
This paper introduces an "in-context probing" method that can efficiently approximate the influence function for data valuation. The influence function is a way to measure how much each training data point contributes to a model's performance, but calculating it exactly can be computationally expensive.
The authors show that their in-context probing approach can provide a good approximation of the influence function, while requiring significantly less computational cost. This makes the method practical for large-scale machine learning tasks, where the full influence function calculation would be infeasible.
The paper's findings have important implications for understanding and optimizing machine learning models, as the ability to quickly identify the most influential data points can enable more efficient model fine-tuning, data subset selection, and other data-centric techniques. As the field of machine learning continues to advance, methods like in-context probing will likely play an increasingly important role.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
In-Context Probing Approximates Influence Function for Data Valuation
Cathy Jiao, Gary Gao, Chenyan Xiong
Data valuation quantifies the value of training data, and is used for data attribution (i.e., determining the contribution of training data towards model predictions), and data selection; both of which are important for curating high-quality datasets to train large language models. In our paper, we show that data valuation through in-context probing (i.e., prompting a LLM) approximates influence functions for selecting training data. We provide a theoretical sketch on this connection based on transformer models performing implicit gradient descent on its in-context inputs. Our empirical findings show that in-context probing and gradient-based influence frameworks are similar in how they rank training data. Furthermore, fine-tuning experiments on data selected by either method reveal similar model performance.
Read more7/18/2024
0
Fast Training Dataset Attribution via In-Context Learning
Milad Fotouhi, Mohammad Taha Bahadori, Oluwaseyi Feyisetan, Payman Arabshahi, David Heckerman
We investigate the use of in-context learning and prompt engineering to estimate the contributions of training data in the outputs of instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs). We propose two novel approaches: (1) a similarity-based approach that measures the difference between LLM outputs with and without provided context, and (2) a mixture distribution model approach that frames the problem of identifying contribution scores as a matrix factorization task. Our empirical comparison demonstrates that the mixture model approach is more robust to retrieval noise in in-context learning, providing a more reliable estimation of data contributions.
Read more8/23/2024
📊
0
What is Your Data Worth to GPT? LLM-Scale Data Valuation with Influence Functions
Sang Keun Choe, Hwijeen Ahn, Juhan Bae, Kewen Zhao, Minsoo Kang, Youngseog Chung, Adithya Pratapa, Willie Neiswanger, Emma Strubell, Teruko Mitamura, Jeff Schneider, Eduard Hovy, Roger Grosse, Eric Xing
Large language models (LLMs) are trained on a vast amount of human-written data, but data providers often remain uncredited. In response to this issue, data valuation (or data attribution), which quantifies the contribution or value of each data to the model output, has been discussed as a potential solution. Nevertheless, applying existing data valuation methods to recent LLMs and their vast training datasets has been largely limited by prohibitive compute and memory costs. In this work, we focus on influence functions, a popular gradient-based data valuation method, and significantly improve its scalability with an efficient gradient projection strategy called LoGra that leverages the gradient structure in backpropagation. We then provide a theoretical motivation of gradient projection approaches to influence functions to promote trust in the data valuation process. Lastly, we lower the barrier to implementing data valuation systems by introducing LogIX, a software package that can transform existing training code into data valuation code with minimal effort. In our data valuation experiments, LoGra achieves competitive accuracy against more expensive baselines while showing up to 6,500x improvement in throughput and 5x reduction in GPU memory usage when applied to Llama3-8B-Instruct and the 1B-token dataset.
Read more5/24/2024
🌿
0
In-Context Learning Demonstration Selection via Influence Analysis
Vinay M. S., Minh-Hao Van, Xintao Wu
Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased their In-Context Learning (ICL) capabilities, enabling few-shot learning without the need for gradient updates. Despite its advantages, the effectiveness of ICL heavily depends on the choice of demonstrations. Selecting the most effective demonstrations for ICL remains a significant research challenge. To tackle this issue, we propose a demonstration selection method named InfICL, which utilizes influence functions to analyze impacts of training samples. By identifying the most influential training samples as demonstrations, InfICL aims to enhance the ICL generalization performance. To keep InfICL cost-effective, we only use the LLM to generate sample input embeddings, avoiding expensive fine-tuning. Through empirical studies on various real-world datasets, we demonstrate advantages of InfICL compared to state-of-the-art baselines.
Read more6/19/2024