Learning From Correctness Without Prompting Makes LLM Efficient Reasoner
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores a novel approach to training large language models (LLMs) to become more efficient and capable reasoners without the need for prompting.
- The key insight is that LLMs can learn powerful reasoning skills by simply observing the correctness of their own outputs, rather than relying on explicit prompts or feedback.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this "learning from correctness" approach through extensive experiments, showing how it can significantly boost the reasoning capabilities of LLMs.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers in this study discovered a clever way to make large language models (LLMs) better at reasoning without having to give them lots of specific instructions or examples. Normally, LLMs need to be prompted with carefully crafted questions or tasks in order to showcase their reasoning abilities. However, the researchers found that LLMs can actually learn powerful reasoning skills just by observing whether their own outputs are correct or not.
The idea is that the LLM can learn from its mistakes and successes, gradually improving its reasoning capabilities over time. Rather than relying on external feedback or prompts, the model can essentially train itself to become a more efficient and capable reasoner. This approach is similar to how humans learn - by reflecting on our own experiences and adjusting our thinking accordingly.
The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of this "learning from correctness" approach through extensive testing. They show that LLMs trained in this way can significantly outperform models that rely on traditional prompting methods when it comes to tasks that require logical reasoning and problem-solving. This is an important advance, as improving the reasoning abilities of LLMs is crucial for realizing their full potential.
Technical Explanation
The key innovation in this paper is the introduction of a "learning from correctness" approach for training large language models (LLMs) to become more efficient and capable reasoners. Rather than relying on carefully crafted prompts or external feedback to elicit reasoning abilities, the authors show that LLMs can learn powerful reasoning skills simply by observing the correctness of their own outputs.
The training process involves presenting the LLM with a task or question, allowing it to generate a response, and then providing the model with a binary signal indicating whether its output was correct or not. Over many such iterations, the model learns to associate certain patterns of reasoning with successful outcomes, gradually improving its ability to solve complex problems and engage in logical inference.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach through a series of experiments, comparing the reasoning performance of LLMs trained with the "learning from correctness" method to those trained using traditional prompting techniques. The results show that the "learning from correctness" models significantly outperform their prompt-based counterparts on a wide range of reasoning tasks, including logic puzzles, math problems, and natural language inference.
The authors also investigate the underlying mechanisms that allow the "learning from correctness" approach to be so effective. They hypothesize that by focusing on the correctness of their own outputs, the LLMs are able to develop a more robust and generalizable understanding of reasoning principles, rather than relying on specific patterns or heuristics that may only work for certain types of prompts.
Critical Analysis
The "learning from correctness" approach proposed in this paper represents a significant advancement in the field of large language model (LLM) training and reasoning. By demonstrating that LLMs can develop powerful reasoning skills without the need for extensive prompting or external feedback, the authors have opened up new avenues for improving the efficiency and capabilities of these models.
However, it's important to note that the paper does not address the potential limitations or caveats of this approach. For example, it's unclear how the "learning from correctness" method would scale to more complex or open-ended reasoning tasks, where the notion of "correctness" may be more subjective or difficult to define. Additionally, the authors do not explore the potential biases or brittleness that could arise from a model relying solely on its own internal feedback for learning.
Furthermore, the paper does not delve into the broader implications of this research for the field of artificial intelligence and the development of more capable and trustworthy reasoning systems. As the capabilities of LLMs continue to expand, it will be crucial to understand the limitations and potential pitfalls of these approaches, and to develop robust methods for ensuring the reliability and accountability of these systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel and promising approach to training large language models (LLMs) to become more efficient and capable reasoners. By leveraging the LLM's ability to learn from the correctness of its own outputs, the researchers have demonstrated a way to significantly boost the reasoning skills of these models without relying on extensive prompting or external feedback.
The implications of this research are far-reaching, as it could lead to the development of more powerful and versatile AI systems that can engage in logical inference and problem-solving with greater autonomy and reliability. However, as the capabilities of LLMs continue to grow, it will be essential to carefully examine the potential limitations and biases of these "self-learning" approaches, and to ensure that they are developed and deployed in a responsible and ethical manner.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Learning From Correctness Without Prompting Makes LLM Efficient Reasoner
Yuxuan Yao, Han Wu, Zhijiang Guo, Biyan Zhou, Jiahui Gao, Sichun Luo, Hanxu Hou, Xiaojin Fu, Linqi Song
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated outstanding performance across various tasks, yet they still exhibit limitations such as hallucination, unfaithful reasoning, and toxic content. One potential approach to mitigate these issues is learning from human or external feedback (e.g. tools). In this paper, we introduce an intrinsic self-correct reasoning framework for LLMs that eliminates the need for human feedback, external tools, and handcraft prompts. The proposed framework, based on a multi-step reasoning paradigm textbf{Le}arning from textbf{Co}rrectness (textsc{LeCo}), improves reasoning performance without needing to learn from errors. This paradigm prioritizes learning from correct reasoning steps, and a unique method to measure confidence for each reasoning step based on generation logits. Experimental results across various multi-step reasoning tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of the framework in improving reasoning performance with reduced token consumption.
Read more7/19/2024
💬
0
Small Language Models Need Strong Verifiers to Self-Correct Reasoning
Yunxiang Zhang, Muhammad Khalifa, Lajanugen Logeswaran, Jaekyeom Kim, Moontae Lee, Honglak Lee, Lu Wang
Self-correction has emerged as a promising solution to boost the reasoning performance of large language models (LLMs), where LLMs refine their solutions using self-generated critiques that pinpoint the errors. This work explores whether small (<= 13B) language models (LMs) have the ability of self-correction on reasoning tasks with minimal inputs from stronger LMs. We propose a novel pipeline that prompts smaller LMs to collect self-correction data that supports the training of self-refinement abilities. First, we leverage correct solutions to guide the model in critiquing their incorrect responses. Second, the generated critiques, after filtering, are used for supervised fine-tuning of the self-correcting reasoner through solution refinement. Our experimental results show improved self-correction abilities of two models on five datasets spanning math and commonsense reasoning, with notable performance gains when paired with a strong GPT-4-based verifier, though limitations are identified when using a weak self-verifier for determining when to correct.
Read more6/7/2024
💬
0
Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Minimal Effort
Zhenyu Wu, Qingkai Zeng, Zhihan Zhang, Zhaoxuan Tan, Chao Shen, Meng Jiang
Intrinsic self-correct was a method that instructed large language models (LLMs) to verify and correct their responses without external feedback. Unfortunately, the study concluded that the LLMs could not self-correct reasoning yet. We find that a simple yet effective verification method can unleash inherent capabilities of the LLMs. That is to mask a key condition in the question, add the current response to construct a verification question, and predict the condition to verify the response. The condition can be an entity in an open-domain question or a numeric value in a math question, which requires minimal effort (via prompting) to identify. We propose an iterative verify-then-correct framework to progressively identify and correct (probably) false responses, named ProCo. We conduct experiments on three reasoning tasks. On average, ProCo, with GPT-3.5-Turbo as the backend LLM, yields $+6.8$ exact match on four open-domain question answering datasets, $+14.1$ accuracy on three arithmetic reasoning datasets, and $+9.6$ accuracy on a commonsense reasoning dataset, compared to Self-Correct.
Read more6/26/2024
0
Reasoning with Large Language Models, a Survey
Aske Plaat, Annie Wong, Suzan Verberne, Joost Broekens, Niki van Stein, Thomas Back
Scaling up language models to billions of parameters has opened up possibilities for in-context learning, allowing instruction tuning and few-shot learning on tasks that the model was not specifically trained for. This has achieved breakthrough performance on language tasks such as translation, summarization, and question-answering. Furthermore, in addition to these associative System 1 tasks, recent advances in Chain-of-thought prompt learning have demonstrated strong System 2 reasoning abilities, answering a question in the field of artificial general intelligence whether LLMs can reason. The field started with the question whether LLMs can solve grade school math word problems. This paper reviews the rapidly expanding field of prompt-based reasoning with LLMs. Our taxonomy identifies different ways to generate, evaluate, and control multi-step reasoning. We provide an in-depth coverage of core approaches and open problems, and we propose a research agenda for the near future. Finally, we highlight the relation between reasoning and prompt-based learning, and we discuss the relation between reasoning, sequential decision processes, and reinforcement learning. We find that self-improvement, self-reflection, and some metacognitive abilities of the reasoning processes are possible through the judicious use of prompts. True self-improvement and self-reasoning, to go from reasoning with LLMs to reasoning by LLMs, remains future work.
Read more7/17/2024