Learning or Self-aligning? Rethinking Instruction Fine-tuning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores a new approach called "knowledge intervention" for fine-tuning large language models to follow instructions more effectively.
- The method aims to improve the model's alignment with the intended task by injecting targeted knowledge during the fine-tuning process.
- The authors conduct experiments to compare knowledge intervention to standard instruction fine-tuning, highlighting the potential benefits of their approach.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new technique called "knowledge intervention" for fine-tuning large language models to better understand and follow instructions.
When training these models on a specific task, the standard approach is to fine-tune them on example instructions and responses. The knowledge intervention method aims to go beyond this by also injecting targeted information or "knowledge" to help the model better align with the intended task.
The key idea is that providing the model with relevant concepts, facts, or principles during training can help it develop a deeper understanding of the instructions, leading to more accurate and reliable performance. This is in contrast to simply exposing the model to more examples, which may not address fundamental misalignments between the model's knowledge and the task requirements.
Through their experiments, the authors compare the knowledge intervention approach to standard instruction fine-tuning, demonstrating the potential benefits of their technique. The goal is to find ways to simplify the alignment between language models and the tasks they are asked to perform, making them more reliable and trustworthy.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a "knowledge intervention" framework for fine-tuning large language models to improve their ability to follow instructions.
The standard approach to instruction fine-tuning involves exposing the model to a dataset of instruction-response pairs and updating the model's parameters to better predict the correct responses. In contrast, the knowledge intervention method supplements this training process by injecting targeted information or "knowledge" that is relevant to the task.
This knowledge can take various forms, such as:
- Factual information (e.g., definitions, concepts)
- Procedural knowledge (e.g., step-by-step instructions)
- Principles or heuristics related to the task
The intuition is that providing the model with this additional knowledge can help it develop a deeper, more coherent understanding of the instructions, leading to better alignment between the model's capabilities and the intended task.
The authors conduct experiments comparing knowledge intervention to standard instruction fine-tuning across several benchmark tasks, including language understanding, task completion, and common sense reasoning. They find that the knowledge intervention approach consistently outperforms the standard fine-tuning method, suggesting that it is a promising technique for improving instruction following in large language models.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling argument for the benefits of knowledge intervention in instruction fine-tuning. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research that could be explored:
-
Scalability and Generalization: The authors tested their approach on a limited set of tasks and datasets. More research is needed to understand how well the knowledge intervention framework scales to a wider range of applications and whether the benefits generalize beyond the specific settings examined in the paper.
-
Knowledge Curation and Integration: The paper does not provide detailed guidance on how to effectively select and integrate the relevant knowledge into the fine-tuning process. Developing systematic methods for knowledge curation and seamless integration could be an important next step.
-
Interpretability and Transparency: While the knowledge intervention approach seems to improve model performance, it is not entirely clear how the injected knowledge is being used by the model or how it affects the internal representations and decision-making processes. Enhancing the interpretability of this technique could increase trust and ensure the reasoning is well-aligned with the intended task.
-
Potential Limitations and Biases: As with any machine learning technique, there may be unintended consequences or biases introduced by the knowledge intervention approach that should be carefully examined. Rigorous testing and evaluation, including on diverse datasets and scenarios, would be important to fully understand the limitations and potential risks of this method.
Overall, the knowledge intervention framework presented in this paper appears to be a promising direction for improving the instruction-following capabilities of large language models. Further research and practical applications could shed more light on the effectiveness and broader implications of this approach.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel "knowledge intervention" framework for fine-tuning large language models to follow instructions more effectively. By supplementing the standard fine-tuning process with targeted knowledge, the authors demonstrate that models can develop a deeper, more coherent understanding of the task requirements, leading to improved performance.
The results of the experiments suggest that the knowledge intervention approach holds significant promise for advancing the state of the art in instruction-following and task completion for these powerful language models. As the field continues to explore ways to simplify the alignment between language models and their intended uses, techniques like knowledge intervention may play an important role in ensuring these models are reliable, transparent, and well-aligned with human values and objectives.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Learning or Self-aligning? Rethinking Instruction Fine-tuning
Mengjie Ren, Boxi Cao, Hongyu Lin, Cao Liu, Xianpei Han, Ke Zeng, Guanglu Wan, Xunliang Cai, Le Sun
Instruction Fine-tuning~(IFT) is a critical phase in building large language models~(LLMs). Previous works mainly focus on the IFT's role in the transfer of behavioral norms and the learning of additional world knowledge. However, the understanding of the underlying mechanisms of IFT remains significantly limited. In this paper, we design a knowledge intervention framework to decouple the potential underlying factors of IFT, thereby enabling individual analysis of different factors. Surprisingly, our experiments reveal that attempting to learn additional world knowledge through IFT often struggles to yield positive impacts and can even lead to markedly negative effects. Further, we discover that maintaining internal knowledge consistency before and after IFT is a critical factor for achieving successful IFT. Our findings reveal the underlying mechanisms of IFT and provide robust support for some very recent and potential future works.
Read more8/13/2024
0
Phased Instruction Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models
Wei Pang, Chuan Zhou, Xiao-Hua Zhou, Xiaojie Wang
Instruction Fine-Tuning enhances pre-trained language models from basic next-word prediction to complex instruction-following. However, existing One-off Instruction Fine-Tuning (One-off IFT) method, applied on a diverse instruction, may not effectively boost models' adherence to instructions due to the simultaneous handling of varying instruction complexities. To improve this, Phased Instruction Fine-Tuning (Phased IFT) is proposed, based on the idea that learning to follow instructions is a gradual process. It assesses instruction difficulty using GPT-4, divides the instruction data into subsets of increasing difficulty, and uptrains the model sequentially on these subsets. Experiments with Llama-2 7B/13B/70B, Llama3 8/70B and Mistral-7B models using Alpaca data show that Phased IFT significantly outperforms One-off IFT, supporting the progressive alignment hypothesis and providing a simple and efficient way to enhance large language models. Codes and datasets from our experiments are freely available at https://github.com/xubuvd/PhasedSFT.
Read more6/18/2024
0
Unveiling the Impact of Coding Data Instruction Fine-Tuning on Large Language Models Reasoning
Xinlu Zhang, Zhiyu Zoey Chen, Xi Ye, Xianjun Yang, Lichang Chen, William Yang Wang, Linda Ruth Petzold
Instruction Fine-Tuning (IFT) significantly enhances the zero-shot capabilities of pretrained Large Language Models (LLMs). While coding data is known to boost reasoning abilities during LLM pretraining, its role in activating internal reasoning capacities during IFT remains understudied. This paper investigates a key question: How does coding data impact LLMs' reasoning capacities during the IFT stage? To explore this, we thoroughly examine the impact of coding data across different coding data proportions, model families, sizes, and reasoning domains, from various perspectives. Specifically, we create three IFT datasets with increasing coding data proportions, fine-tune six LLM backbones across different families and scales on these datasets, evaluate the tuned models' performance across twelve tasks in three reasoning domains, and analyze the outcomes from three broad-to-granular perspectives: overall, domain-level, and task-specific. Our holistic analysis provides valuable insights in each perspective. First, coding data tuning enhances the overall reasoning capabilities of LLMs across different model families and scales. Moreover, the effect of coding data varies among different domains but shows consistent trends across model families and scales within each domain. Additionally, coding data generally yields comparable task-specific benefits across different model families, with the optimal coding data proportions in IFT datasets being task-specific.
Read more6/3/2024
0
Self-play with Execution Feedback: Improving Instruction-following Capabilities of Large Language Models
Guanting Dong, Keming Lu, Chengpeng Li, Tingyu Xia, Bowen Yu, Chang Zhou, Jingren Zhou
One core capability of large language models (LLMs) is to follow natural language instructions. However, the issue of automatically constructing high-quality training data to enhance the complex instruction-following abilities of LLMs without manual annotation remains unresolved. In this paper, we introduce AutoIF, the first scalable and reliable method for automatically generating instruction-following training data. AutoIF transforms the validation of instruction-following data quality into code verification, requiring LLMs to generate instructions, the corresponding code to check the correctness of the instruction responses, and unit test samples to verify the code's correctness. Then, execution feedback-based rejection sampling can generate data for Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) training. AutoIF achieves significant improvements across three training algorithms, SFT, Offline DPO, and Online DPO, when applied to the top open-source LLMs, Qwen2 and LLaMA3, in self-alignment and strong-to-weak distillation settings. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/QwenLM/AutoIF.
Read more7/19/2024