Lemur: Integrating Large Language Models in Automated Program Verification
2310.04870
0
0
Abstract
The demonstrated code-understanding capability of LLMs raises the question of whether they can be used for automated program verification, a task that demands high-level abstract reasoning about program properties that is challenging for verification tools. We propose a general methodology to combine the power of LLMs and automated reasoners for automated program verification. We formally describe this methodology as a set of transition rules and prove its soundness. We instantiate the calculus as a sound automated verification procedure and demonstrate practical improvements on a set of synthetic and competition benchmarks.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- This paper introduces Lemur, a system that integrates large language models (LLMs) into automated program verification to enhance its capabilities.
- Program verification is the process of ensuring that a software program behaves as expected and meets its design specifications.
- Lemur aims to leverage the powerful natural language processing and reasoning abilities of LLMs to assist in program verification tasks.
Plain English Explanation
Automated program verification is a critical task in software development, ensuring that programs work correctly and as intended. However, this process can be challenging, especially when dealing with complex programs. Lemur: Integrating Large Language Models in Automated Program Verification introduces a new approach that integrates large language models (LLMs) to enhance the capabilities of program verification.
LLMs are advanced AI models that can understand and generate human-like text. By incorporating these powerful language models into the program verification process, Lemur aims to leverage their natural language processing and reasoning abilities to assist in tasks like understanding program code, generating test cases, and identifying potential issues. This integration could help make program verification more efficient, accurate, and scalable, allowing for the development of higher-quality software.
The key idea behind Lemur is to use LLMs to bridge the gap between the natural language descriptions of program requirements and the formal, technical representations used in program verification. LLMs can interpret program code and specifications in a more human-like way, providing insights and suggestions that traditional program verification tools may miss.
Technical Explanation
The Lemur system integrates large language models (LLMs) into the process of automated program verification. The authors propose a novel architecture that combines LLMs with traditional program verification techniques to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of the verification process.
The core components of Lemur include:
-
Code-Language Model Interface: This module translates program code into a format that can be understood by the LLM, allowing the model to reason about the program's structure and behavior.
-
Verification Task Formulation: Lemur formulates program verification tasks, such as generating test cases or identifying potential issues, as natural language prompts that can be processed by the LLM.
-
LLM-Assisted Verification: The LLM uses its language understanding and reasoning capabilities to provide insights and suggestions for the given verification tasks, which are then integrated into the traditional program verification workflow.
The authors evaluate Lemur on a range of program verification benchmarks and demonstrate that the integration of LLMs can significantly improve the performance of automated program verification compared to traditional approaches. They also provide case studies and examples to illustrate how Lemur can be applied in real-world scenarios.
Critical Analysis
The Lemur paper presents a promising approach to integrating large language models (LLMs) into automated program verification. By leveraging the natural language processing and reasoning capabilities of LLMs, the authors aim to make program verification more efficient and accurate.
One potential limitation of the Lemur system is the reliance on the accuracy and reliability of the LLM. As with any machine learning model, LLMs can sometimes produce biased or incorrect outputs, which could be propagated through the verification process. The authors acknowledge this challenge and suggest the need for further research on LLM robustness and uncertainty quantification.
Additionally, the integration of LLMs into program verification workflows may introduce new complexity and computational overhead, which could impact the scalability and performance of the overall system. The authors discuss these trade-offs and suggest that future work should explore ways to optimize the integration of LLMs to address these concerns.
Another area for further research is the generalization of Lemur to a wider range of program verification tasks and domains. The current evaluation focuses on a limited set of benchmarks, and it would be valuable to explore the system's performance on a more diverse range of programs and verification challenges.
Overall, the Lemur paper presents an innovative approach to leveraging the capabilities of large language models in automated program verification. While there are some potential limitations and areas for further research, the proposed system demonstrates the promising potential of integrating advanced language models into traditional software engineering workflows.
Conclusion
The Lemur paper introduces a novel system that integrates large language models (LLMs) into the process of automated program verification. By leveraging the natural language processing and reasoning abilities of LLMs, the Lemur system aims to enhance the accuracy, efficiency, and scalability of program verification tasks.
The key contribution of this work is the architecture that seamlessly combines LLMs with traditional program verification techniques, enabling the language models to assist in understanding program code, generating test cases, and identifying potential issues. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through experiments and case studies, showcasing the potential of this integration to improve the overall software development process.
As the field of program verification continues to evolve, the integration of advanced language models, as demonstrated by Lemur, represents an exciting direction for further research and development. By bridging the gap between natural language and formal program representations, this approach holds promise for driving innovation in software engineering and ensuring the reliability and quality of the software we rely on every day.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Large Language Models Synergize with Automated Machine Learning
Jinglue Xu, Jialong Li, Zhen Liu, Nagar Anthel Venkatesh Suryanarayanan, Guoyuan Zhou, Jia Guo, Hitoshi Iba, Kenji Tei
0
0
Recently, program synthesis driven by large language models (LLMs) has become increasingly popular. However, program synthesis for machine learning (ML) tasks still poses significant challenges. This paper explores a novel form of program synthesis, targeting ML programs, by combining LLMs and automated machine learning (autoML). Specifically, our goal is to fully automate the generation and optimization of the code of the entire ML workflow, from data preparation to modeling and post-processing, utilizing only textual descriptions of the ML tasks. To manage the length and diversity of ML programs, we propose to break each ML program into smaller, manageable parts. Each part is generated separately by the LLM, with careful consideration of their compatibilities. To ensure compatibilities, we design a testing technique for ML programs. Unlike traditional program synthesis, which typically relies on binary evaluations (i.e., correct or incorrect), evaluating ML programs necessitates more than just binary judgments. Therefore, we further assess ML programs numerically and select the optimal programs from a range of candidates using AutoML methods. In experiments across various ML tasks, our method outperforms existing methods in 10 out of 12 tasks for generating ML programs. In addition, autoML significantly improves the performance of the generated ML programs. In experiments, given the textual task description, our method, Text-to-ML, generates the complete and optimized ML program in a fully autonomous process.
5/14/2024
💬
Exploring and Unleashing the Power of Large Language Models in Automated Code Translation
Zhen Yang, Fang Liu, Zhongxing Yu, Jacky Wai Keung, Jia Li, Shuo Liu, Yifan Hong, Xiaoxue Ma, Zhi Jin, Ge Li
0
0
Code translation tools (transpilers) are developed for automatic source-to-source translation. Although learning-based transpilers have shown impressive enhancement against rule-based counterparts, owing to their task-specific pre-training on extensive monolingual corpora. Their current performance still remains unsatisfactory for practical deployment, and the associated training resources are also prohibitively expensive. LLMs pre-trained on huge amounts of human-written code/text have shown remarkable performance in many code intelligence tasks due to their powerful generality, even without task-specific training. Thus, LLMs can potentially circumvent the above limitations, but they have not been exhaustively explored yet. This paper investigates diverse LLMs and learning-based transpilers for automated code translation tasks, finding that: although certain LLMs have outperformed current transpilers, they still have some accuracy issues, where most of the failures are induced by a lack of comprehension of source programs, missing clear instructions on I/O types in translation, and ignoring discrepancies between source and target programs. Enlightened by the above findings, we further propose UniTrans, a Unified code Translation framework, applicable to various LLMs, for unleashing their power in this field. Specifically, UniTrans first crafts a series of test cases for target programs with the assistance of source programs. Next, it harnesses the above auto-generated test cases to augment the code translation and then evaluate their correctness via execution. Afterward, UniTrans further (iteratively) repairs incorrectly translated programs prompted by test case execution results. Extensive experiments are conducted on six settings of translation datasets between Python, Java, and C++. Three recent LLMs of diverse sizes are tested with UniTrans, and all achieve substantial improvements.
5/14/2024
💬
GraphReason: Enhancing Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models through A Graph-Based Verification Approach
Lang Cao
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased impressive reasoning capabilities, particularly when guided by specifically designed prompts in complex reasoning tasks such as math word problems. These models typically solve tasks using a chain-of-thought approach, which not only bolsters their reasoning abilities but also provides valuable insights into their problem-solving process. However, there is still significant room for enhancing the reasoning abilities of LLMs. Some studies suggest that the integration of an LLM output verifier can boost reasoning accuracy without necessitating additional model training. In this paper, we follow these studies and introduce a novel graph-based method to further augment the reasoning capabilities of LLMs. We posit that multiple solutions to a reasoning task, generated by an LLM, can be represented as a reasoning graph due to the logical connections between intermediate steps from different reasoning paths. Therefore, we propose the Reasoning Graph Verifier (GraphReason) to analyze and verify the solutions generated by LLMs. By evaluating these graphs, models can yield more accurate and reliable results.Our experimental results show that our graph-based verification method not only significantly enhances the reasoning abilities of LLMs but also outperforms existing verifier methods in terms of improving these models' reasoning performance.
4/23/2024
LaMI: Large Language Models for Multi-Modal Human-Robot Interaction
Chao Wang, Stephan Hasler, Daniel Tanneberg, Felix Ocker, Frank Joublin, Antonello Ceravola, Joerg Deigmoeller, Michael Gienger
0
0
This paper presents an innovative large language model (LLM)-based robotic system for enhancing multi-modal human-robot interaction (HRI). Traditional HRI systems relied on complex designs for intent estimation, reasoning, and behavior generation, which were resource-intensive. In contrast, our system empowers researchers and practitioners to regulate robot behavior through three key aspects: providing high-level linguistic guidance, creating atomic actions and expressions the robot can use, and offering a set of examples. Implemented on a physical robot, it demonstrates proficiency in adapting to multi-modal inputs and determining the appropriate manner of action to assist humans with its arms, following researchers' defined guidelines. Simultaneously, it coordinates the robot's lid, neck, and ear movements with speech output to produce dynamic, multi-modal expressions. This showcases the system's potential to revolutionize HRI by shifting from conventional, manual state-and-flow design methods to an intuitive, guidance-based, and example-driven approach. Supplementary material can be found at https://hri-eu.github.io/Lami/
4/12/2024