Linkage on Security, Privacy and Fairness in Federated Learning: New Balances and New Perspectives

Read original: arXiv:2406.10884 - Published 6/18/2024 by Linlin Wang, Tianqing Zhu, Wanlei Zhou, Philip S. Yu
Total Score

0

Linkage on Security, Privacy and Fairness in Federated Learning: New Balances and New Perspectives

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper examines the relationship between security, privacy, and fairness in federated learning, a machine learning technique where training data is distributed across many devices.
  • The authors explore new balances and perspectives on these important considerations in federated learning systems.

Plain English Explanation

Federated learning is a way of training machine learning models without gathering all the training data in one place. Instead, the training happens on individual devices, like your smartphone, and only the model updates are shared with a central server. This can help protect the privacy of the data.

However, this approach raises new challenges around security, privacy, and fairness. For example, how do we ensure the model updates don't reveal sensitive information about the training data? And how do we make sure the model performs equally well for different groups of users?

This paper explores these issues, looking for new ways to balance security, privacy, and fairness in federated learning systems. The authors provide insights and perspectives that could help developers build more robust and ethical federated learning applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper first provides background on federated learning and the key considerations of security, privacy, and fairness. It then delves into several research directions that aim to address these challenges:

  1. Secure Aggregation: Techniques for securely combining model updates from different devices to protect individual privacy.
  2. Differentially Private Federated Learning: Using differential privacy to add noise to model updates, further obscuring the original training data.
  3. Fairness-Aware Federated Learning: Approaches to ensure the federated model performs equitably across diverse user groups.
  4. Federated Unlearning: Methods for selectively "unlearning" certain data points to improve model stability and fairness.

The authors discuss the trade-offs and nuances involved in each of these areas, highlighting new research directions and open problems that could guide future work in this space.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the key security, privacy, and fairness challenges in federated learning, and offers valuable insights into emerging solutions. However, it also acknowledges the inherent tensions and trade-offs between these different objectives.

For example, techniques like secure aggregation and differential privacy can help protect individual privacy, but may come at the cost of model performance or fairness. Similarly, approaches to achieve fairness may require compromises in terms of privacy or computational efficiency.

The authors also note that many of the proposed solutions are still in the research stage and have not been thoroughly tested in real-world, large-scale deployments. Further work is needed to validate the practicality and scalability of these techniques.

Moreover, the paper does not delve deeply into some of the broader societal implications of federated learning, such as the potential for data and algorithmic biases to be amplified, or the risk of federated learning being used to centralize control over sensitive user data.

Conclusion

This paper offers a timely and insightful exploration of the intricate relationships between security, privacy, and fairness in federated learning. By highlighting emerging research directions and the inherent trade-offs involved, the authors provide a valuable resource for developers, researchers, and policymakers working to harness the benefits of federated learning while addressing its ethical and technical challenges.

As federated learning continues to gain traction in a wide range of applications, from healthcare to finance, the issues discussed in this paper will only become more critical. The authors' work contributes to a deeper understanding of these complex topics and could help guide the development of more secure, private, and equitable federated learning systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Linkage on Security, Privacy and Fairness in Federated Learning: New Balances and New Perspectives
Total Score

0

Linkage on Security, Privacy and Fairness in Federated Learning: New Balances and New Perspectives

Linlin Wang, Tianqing Zhu, Wanlei Zhou, Philip S. Yu

Federated learning is fast becoming a popular paradigm for applications involving mobile devices, banking systems, healthcare, and IoT systems. Hence, over the past five years, researchers have undertaken extensive studies on the privacy leaks, security threats, and fairness associated with these emerging models. For the most part, these three critical concepts have been studied in isolation; however, recent research has revealed that there may be an intricate interplay between them. For instance, some researchers have discovered that pursuing fairness may compromise privacy, or that efforts to enhance security can impact fairness. These emerging insights shed light on the fundamental connections between privacy, security, and fairness within federated learning, and, by delving deeper into these interconnections, we may be able to significantly augment research and development across the field. Consequently, the aim of this survey is to offer comprehensive descriptions of the privacy, security, and fairness issues in federated learning. Moreover, we analyze the complex relationships between these three dimensions of cyber safety and pinpoint the fundamental elements that influence each of them. We contend that there exists a trade-off between privacy and fairness and between security and gradient sharing. On this basis, fairness can function as a bridge between privacy and security to build models that are either more secure or more private. Building upon our observations, we identify the trade-offs between privacy and fairness and between security and fairness within the context of federated learning. The survey then concludes with promising directions for future research in this vanguard field.

Read more

6/18/2024

🌐

Total Score

0

A Multivocal Literature Review on Privacy and Fairness in Federated Learning

Beatrice Balbierer, Lukas Heinlein, Domenique Zipperling, Niklas Kuhl

Federated Learning presents a way to revolutionize AI applications by eliminating the necessity for data sharing. Yet, research has shown that information can still be extracted during training, making additional privacy-preserving measures such as differential privacy imperative. To implement real-world federated learning applications, fairness, ranging from a fair distribution of performance to non-discriminative behaviour, must be considered. Particularly in high-risk applications (e.g. healthcare), avoiding the repetition of past discriminatory errors is paramount. As recent research has demonstrated an inherent tension between privacy and fairness, we conduct a multivocal literature review to examine the current methods to integrate privacy and fairness in federated learning. Our analyses illustrate that the relationship between privacy and fairness has been neglected, posing a critical risk for real-world applications. We highlight the need to explore the relationship between privacy, fairness, and performance, advocating for the creation of integrated federated learning frameworks.

Read more

8/19/2024

Federated Fairness Analytics: Quantifying Fairness in Federated Learning
Total Score

0

Federated Fairness Analytics: Quantifying Fairness in Federated Learning

Oscar Dilley, Juan Marcelo Parra-Ullauri, Rasheed Hussain, Dimitra Simeonidou

Federated Learning (FL) is a privacy-enhancing technology for distributed ML. By training models locally and aggregating updates - a federation learns together, while bypassing centralised data collection. FL is increasingly popular in healthcare, finance and personal computing. However, it inherits fairness challenges from classical ML and introduces new ones, resulting from differences in data quality, client participation, communication constraints, aggregation methods and underlying hardware. Fairness remains an unresolved issue in FL and the community has identified an absence of succinct definitions and metrics to quantify fairness; to address this, we propose Federated Fairness Analytics - a methodology for measuring fairness. Our definition of fairness comprises four notions with novel, corresponding metrics. They are symptomatically defined and leverage techniques originating from XAI, cooperative game-theory and networking engineering. We tested a range of experimental settings, varying the FL approach, ML task and data settings. The results show that statistical heterogeneity and client participation affect fairness and fairness conscious approaches such as Ditto and q-FedAvg marginally improve fairness-performance trade-offs. Using our techniques, FL practitioners can uncover previously unobtainable insights into their system's fairness, at differing levels of granularity in order to address fairness challenges in FL. We have open-sourced our work at: https://github.com/oscardilley/federated-fairness.

Read more

8/16/2024

Privacy-preserving gradient-based fair federated learning
Total Score

0

Privacy-preserving gradient-based fair federated learning

Janis Adamek, Moritz Schulze Darup

Federated learning (FL) schemes allow multiple participants to collaboratively train neural networks without the need to directly share the underlying data.However, in early schemes, all participants eventually obtain the same model. Moreover, the aggregation is typically carried out by a third party, who obtains combined gradients or weights, which may reveal the model. These downsides underscore the demand for fair and privacy-preserving FL schemes. Here, collaborative fairness asks for individual model quality depending on the individual data contribution. Privacy is demanded with respect to any kind of data outsourced to the third party. Now, there already exist some approaches aiming for either fair or privacy-preserving FL and a few works even address both features. In our paper, we build upon these seminal works and present a novel, fair and privacy-preserving FL scheme. Our approach, which mainly relies on homomorphic encryption, stands out for exclusively using local gradients. This increases the usability in comparison to state-of-the-art approaches and thereby opens the door to applications in control.

Read more

7/22/2024