LLM Platform Security: Applying a Systematic Evaluation Framework to OpenAI's ChatGPT Plugins
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper systematically evaluates the security of OpenAI's ChatGPT plugins, a feature that allows users to extend the functionality of the language model.
- The researchers applied a comprehensive security assessment framework to identify potential vulnerabilities and security risks in the plugin ecosystem.
- The findings provide important insights into the security implications of integrating third-party plugins with large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines the security of ChatGPT plugins, which are add-ons that can expand the capabilities of OpenAI's popular language model. The researchers used a structured evaluation framework to assess the potential vulnerabilities and security risks in this plugin ecosystem.
By applying this systematic approach, the paper uncovers important insights about the security implications of integrating third-party plugins with large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT. The findings can help inform the development of more secure and robust LLM platforms in the future.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by providing background on the plugin architecture and interaction workflow for LLM platforms like ChatGPT. This outlines how third-party plugins can be integrated to extend the model's functionality, creating potential security risks.
The researchers then describe their systematic evaluation framework for assessing the security of these plugin ecosystems. This framework covers key areas like plugin vetting, plugin integration and execution, and user-plugin interactions.
Applying this framework to OpenAI's ChatGPT plugins, the paper identifies a range of potential vulnerabilities and security risks. These include issues with plugin vetting, insecure data handling, and the ability for malicious plugins to interact with user accounts and systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges several limitations and caveats to their research. For example, the analysis is limited to the public information available about ChatGPT plugins, and the full extent of security measures implemented by OpenAI may not be captured.
Additionally, the researchers note that their framework, while comprehensive, may not uncover all possible security issues. As LLM platforms and plugin ecosystems continue to evolve, new vulnerabilities and attack vectors may emerge that require further investigation.
Conclusion
This paper provides a valuable, systematic evaluation of the security implications of integrating third-party plugins with large language models like ChatGPT. The findings highlight the need for robust security measures and vetting processes to mitigate the risks inherent in expanding the functionality of these powerful AI systems.
The insights from this research can inform the development of more secure LLM platforms and help guide users and developers in navigating the emerging ecosystem of LLM plugins with a greater awareness of the potential security challenges.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
LLM Platform Security: Applying a Systematic Evaluation Framework to OpenAI's ChatGPT Plugins
Umar Iqbal, Tadayoshi Kohno, Franziska Roesner
Large language model (LLM) platforms, such as ChatGPT, have recently begun offering an app ecosystem to interface with third-party services on the internet. While these apps extend the capabilities of LLM platforms, they are developed by arbitrary third parties and thus cannot be implicitly trusted. Apps also interface with LLM platforms and users using natural language, which can have imprecise interpretations. In this paper, we propose a framework that lays a foundation for LLM platform designers to analyze and improve the security, privacy, and safety of current and future third-party integrated LLM platforms. Our framework is a formulation of an attack taxonomy that is developed by iteratively exploring how LLM platform stakeholders could leverage their capabilities and responsibilities to mount attacks against each other. As part of our iterative process, we apply our framework in the context of OpenAI's plugin (apps) ecosystem. We uncover plugins that concretely demonstrate the potential for the types of issues that we outline in our attack taxonomy. We conclude by discussing novel challenges and by providing recommendations to improve the security, privacy, and safety of present and future LLM-based computing platforms.
Read more7/30/2024
💬
0
Attacks on Third-Party APIs of Large Language Models
Wanru Zhao, Vidit Khazanchi, Haodi Xing, Xuanli He, Qiongkai Xu, Nicholas Donald Lane
Large language model (LLM) services have recently begun offering a plugin ecosystem to interact with third-party API services. This innovation enhances the capabilities of LLMs, but it also introduces risks, as these plugins developed by various third parties cannot be easily trusted. This paper proposes a new attacking framework to examine security and safety vulnerabilities within LLM platforms that incorporate third-party services. Applying our framework specifically to widely used LLMs, we identify real-world malicious attacks across various domains on third-party APIs that can imperceptibly modify LLM outputs. The paper discusses the unique challenges posed by third-party API integration and offers strategic possibilities to improve the security and safety of LLM ecosystems moving forward. Our code is released at https://github.com/vk0812/Third-Party-Attacks-on-LLMs.
Read more4/29/2024
🤿
0
The Ethics of Interaction: Mitigating Security Threats in LLMs
Ashutosh Kumar, Shiv Vignesh Murthy, Sagarika Singh, Swathy Ragupathy
This paper comprehensively explores the ethical challenges arising from security threats to Large Language Models (LLMs). These intricate digital repositories are increasingly integrated into our daily lives, making them prime targets for attacks that can compromise their training data and the confidentiality of their data sources. The paper delves into the nuanced ethical repercussions of such security threats on society and individual privacy. We scrutinize five major threats--prompt injection, jailbreaking, Personal Identifiable Information (PII) exposure, sexually explicit content, and hate-based content--going beyond mere identification to assess their critical ethical consequences and the urgency they create for robust defensive strategies. The escalating reliance on LLMs underscores the crucial need for ensuring these systems operate within the bounds of ethical norms, particularly as their misuse can lead to significant societal and individual harm. We propose conceptualizing and developing an evaluative tool tailored for LLMs, which would serve a dual purpose: guiding developers and designers in preemptive fortification of backend systems and scrutinizing the ethical dimensions of LLM chatbot responses during the testing phase. By comparing LLM responses with those expected from humans in a moral context, we aim to discern the degree to which AI behaviors align with the ethical values held by a broader society. Ultimately, this paper not only underscores the ethical troubles presented by LLMs; it also highlights a path toward cultivating trust in these systems.
Read more7/11/2024
0
On the (In)Security of LLM App Stores
Xinyi Hou, Yanjie Zhao, Haoyu Wang
LLM app stores have seen rapid growth, leading to the proliferation of numerous custom LLM apps. However, this expansion raises security concerns. In this study, we propose a three-layer concern framework to identify the potential security risks of LLM apps, i.e., LLM apps with abusive potential, LLM apps with malicious intent, and LLM apps with exploitable vulnerabilities. Over five months, we collected 786,036 LLM apps from six major app stores: GPT Store, FlowGPT, Poe, Coze, Cici, and Character.AI. Our research integrates static and dynamic analysis, the development of a large-scale toxic word dictionary (i.e., ToxicDict) comprising over 31,783 entries, and automated monitoring tools to identify and mitigate threats. We uncovered that 15,146 apps had misleading descriptions, 1,366 collected sensitive personal information against their privacy policies, and 15,996 generated harmful content such as hate speech, self-harm, extremism, etc. Additionally, we evaluated the potential for LLM apps to facilitate malicious activities, finding that 616 apps could be used for malware generation, phishing, etc. Our findings highlight the urgent need for robust regulatory frameworks and enhanced enforcement mechanisms.
Read more7/30/2024