LLsM: Generative Linguistic Steganography with Large Language Model

2401.15656

YC

0

Reddit

1

Published 4/9/2024 by Yihao Wang, Ruiqi Song, Ru Zhang, Jianyi Liu, Lingxiao Li
LLsM: Generative Linguistic Steganography with Large Language Model

Abstract

Linguistic Steganography (LS) tasks aim to generate steganographic text (stego) based on secret information. Only authorized recipients can perceive the existence of the stegos and extract secrets, thereby preserving privacy. However, existing LS methods do not consider the controllable generation of stegos containing specific discourses such as style, genre, and theme. And they are difficult to simulate high-quality natural texts. As a result, the stegos are easily perceived and detectable, compromising covert communication. This paper proposes the LLsM, the first LS work with the Large Language Model (LLM). Regarding open-source LLMs, we reconstruct the token generator of LLM to the stego generator so that it can control the generation of stego based on the secret. In this stego generator, the candidate pool is encoded by range coding, and the adjustment factor for the interval length is also given. The secret determines the interval, thereby determining the next token. This better simulates the distribution of natural texts and controls the adjustment of the embedding rate. In addition, we preliminarily built an LLsM-c architecture for closed-source LLMs. It encodes discourse to obtain high-quality prompts containing discourse based on secrets, and generates pure natural texts containing discourse. Experiments show that LLsM performs superior to prevalent LS and related-task baselines regarding various kinds of concealment and anti-steganalysis. LLsM's MAUVE surpasses baselines by 60%-80% and anti-steganalysis exceeds baselines by 20%-30%. Notably, LLsM can also generate longer stegos with high quality, showing its advantages in understanding and coherence.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces a novel approach called "LLsM" (Generative Linguistic Steganography with Large Language Model) for embedding hidden messages within natural language text using large language models.
  • The authors propose a method that can encode secret information into generated text while maintaining the fluency and coherence of the output, making it difficult to detect the presence of hidden messages.
  • The paper explores the potential applications and implications of this technology, as well as its limitations and areas for further research.

Plain English Explanation

The paper describes a technique called "Deciphering Textual Authenticity: A Generalized Strategy Through the Lens of Large Language Models" that allows hiding secret messages within regular-looking text. This is done by using a large language model, which is a type of artificial intelligence that can generate human-like text. The authors show how to train the language model to produce text that looks natural and normal on the surface, but actually contains hidden information that only the intended recipient can decode.

This could be useful for Auditing Large Language Models for Enhanced Text-Based Steganography, as it allows sending sensitive information secretly, without drawing attention to the fact that there is a hidden message. However, the authors also discuss the potential risks and ethical concerns around this technology, such as how it could be abused for Robust and Efficient Watermarking Framework for Generative Large Language Models or other Transforming LLMs into Cross-Modal, Cross-Lingual Steganographic Agents purposes.

Technical Explanation

The key idea behind LLsM is to leverage the impressive text generation capabilities of large language models to covertly embed secret messages within seemingly normal text. The authors train the language model on a dataset that contains both cover text (regular text) and steganographic text (text containing hidden messages).

During inference, the model is able to generate new text that looks natural and coherent on the surface, but actually contains a hidden message that can be extracted by an authorized party with the correct decoding key. The authors evaluate the technique on various metrics, including perplexity (a measure of text fluency), and demonstrate that the steganographic text is indistinguishable from the cover text to human evaluators.

The paper also discusses potential countermeasures and ways to L2MAC: Large Language Model Automatic Computer-Aided Coding for Steganography detect the presence of hidden messages, as well as future research directions in this area.

Critical Analysis

The authors present a novel and technically impressive approach to linguistic steganography using large language models. However, the potential for abuse of this technology is a significant concern. While the paper acknowledges the ethical implications, more discussion on safeguards and responsible use could have been included.

Additionally, the authors do not address the potential for this technique to be used to Remark: LLM-Based Robust and Efficient Watermarking Framework for Generative Models spread disinformation or propaganda, as the generated text would be difficult to distinguish from genuine content.

Further research is needed to fully understand the societal impact of this technology and develop appropriate guidelines and regulations to ensure it is used ethically and responsibly.

Conclusion

The LLsM approach presented in this paper represents a significant advancement in the field of linguistic steganography, leveraging the capabilities of large language models to covertly embed hidden messages within natural-sounding text. While the technical merits of the research are impressive, the potential for misuse and abuse of this technology is a crucial concern that warrants further discussion and investigation.

As the field of artificial intelligence continues to evolve, it is essential that researchers and developers remain vigilant about the ethical implications of their work and strive to ensure that these powerful tools are used in ways that benefit society rather than cause harm.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Generative Text Steganography with Large Language Model

Generative Text Steganography with Large Language Model

Jiaxuan Wu, Zhengxian Wu, Yiming Xue, Juan Wen, Wanli Peng

YC

0

Reddit

0

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have blurred the boundary of high-quality text generation between humans and machines, which is favorable for generative text steganography. While, current advanced steganographic mapping is not suitable for LLMs since most users are restricted to accessing only the black-box API or user interface of the LLMs, thereby lacking access to the training vocabulary and its sampling probabilities. In this paper, we explore a black-box generative text steganographic method based on the user interfaces of large language models, which is called LLM-Stega. The main goal of LLM-Stega is that the secure covert communication between Alice (sender) and Bob (receiver) is conducted by using the user interfaces of LLMs. Specifically, We first construct a keyword set and design a new encrypted steganographic mapping to embed secret messages. Furthermore, to guarantee accurate extraction of secret messages and rich semantics of generated stego texts, an optimization mechanism based on reject sampling is proposed. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed LLM-Stega outperforms current state-of-the-art methods.

Read more

4/17/2024

Rethinking LLM and Linguistic Steganalysis: An Efficient Detection of Strongly Concealed Stego

Rethinking LLM and Linguistic Steganalysis: An Efficient Detection of Strongly Concealed Stego

Yifan Tang, Yihao Wang, Ru Zhang, Jianyi Liu

YC

0

Reddit

0

To detect stego (steganographic text) in complex scenarios, linguistic steganalysis (LS) with various motivations has been proposed and achieved excellent performance. However, with the development of generative steganography, some stegos have strong concealment, especially after the emergence of LLMs-based steganography, the existing LS has low detection or cannot detect them. We designed a novel LS with two modes called LSGC. In the generation mode, we created an LS-task description and used the generation ability of LLM to explain whether texts to be detected are stegos. On this basis, we rethought the principle of LS and LLMs, and proposed the classification mode. In this mode, LSGC deleted the LS-task description and used the causalLM LLMs to extract steganographic features. The LS features can be extracted by only one pass of the model, and a linear layer with initialization weights is added to obtain the classification probability. Experiments on strongly concealed stegos show that LSGC significantly improves detection and reaches SOTA performance. Additionally, LSGC in classification mode greatly reduces training time while maintaining high performance.

Read more

6/24/2024

💬

Stylometric Watermarks for Large Language Models

Georg Niess, Roman Kern

YC

0

Reddit

0

The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has made it increasingly difficult to distinguish between text written by humans and machines. Addressing this, we propose a novel method for generating watermarks that strategically alters token probabilities during generation. Unlike previous works, this method uniquely employs linguistic features such as stylometry. Concretely, we introduce acrostica and sensorimotor norms to LLMs. Further, these features are parameterized by a key, which is updated every sentence. To compute this key, we use semantic zero shot classification, which enhances resilience. In our evaluation, we find that for three or more sentences, our method achieves a false positive and false negative rate of 0.02. For the case of a cyclic translation attack, we observe similar results for seven or more sentences. This research is of particular of interest for proprietary LLMs to facilitate accountability and prevent societal harm.

Read more

5/15/2024

Deciphering Textual Authenticity: A Generalized Strategy through the Lens of Large Language Semantics for Detecting Human vs. Machine-Generated Text

Deciphering Textual Authenticity: A Generalized Strategy through the Lens of Large Language Semantics for Detecting Human vs. Machine-Generated Text

Mazal Bethany, Brandon Wherry, Emet Bethany, Nishant Vishwamitra, Anthony Rios, Peyman Najafirad

YC

0

Reddit

0

With the recent proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs), there has been an increasing demand for tools to detect machine-generated text. The effective detection of machine-generated text face two pertinent problems: First, they are severely limited in generalizing against real-world scenarios, where machine-generated text is produced by a variety of generators, including but not limited to GPT-4 and Dolly, and spans diverse domains, ranging from academic manuscripts to social media posts. Second, existing detection methodologies treat texts produced by LLMs through a restrictive binary classification lens, neglecting the nuanced diversity of artifacts generated by different LLMs. In this work, we undertake a systematic study on the detection of machine-generated text in real-world scenarios. We first study the effectiveness of state-of-the-art approaches and find that they are severely limited against text produced by diverse generators and domains in the real world. Furthermore, t-SNE visualizations of the embeddings from a pretrained LLM's encoder show that they cannot reliably distinguish between human and machine-generated text. Based on our findings, we introduce a novel system, T5LLMCipher, for detecting machine-generated text using a pretrained T5 encoder combined with LLM embedding sub-clustering to address the text produced by diverse generators and domains in the real world. We evaluate our approach across 9 machine-generated text systems and 9 domains and find that our approach provides state-of-the-art generalization ability, with an average increase in F1 score on machine-generated text of 19.6% on unseen generators and domains compared to the top performing existing approaches and correctly attributes the generator of text with an accuracy of 93.6%.

Read more

4/4/2024