Logic Query of Thoughts: Guiding Large Language Models to Answer Complex Logic Queries with Knowledge Graphs
2404.04264
0
0
š¬
Abstract
Despite the superb performance in many tasks, large language models (LLMs) bear the risk of generating hallucination or even wrong answers when confronted with tasks that demand the accuracy of knowledge. The issue becomes even more noticeable when addressing logic queries that require multiple logic reasoning steps. On the other hand, knowledge graph (KG) based question answering methods are capable of accurately identifying the correct answers with the help of knowledge graph, yet its accuracy could quickly deteriorate when the knowledge graph itself is sparse and incomplete. It remains a critical challenge on how to integrate knowledge graph reasoning with LLMs in a mutually beneficial way so as to mitigate both the hallucination problem of LLMs as well as the incompleteness issue of knowledge graphs. In this paper, we propose 'Logic-Query-of-Thoughts' (LGOT) which is the first of its kind to combine LLMs with knowledge graph based logic query reasoning. LGOT seamlessly combines knowledge graph reasoning and LLMs, effectively breaking down complex logic queries into easy to answer subquestions. Through the utilization of both knowledge graph reasoning and LLMs, it successfully derives answers for each subquestion. By aggregating these results and selecting the highest quality candidate answers for each step, LGOT achieves accurate results to complex questions. Our experimental findings demonstrate substantial performance enhancements, with up to 20% improvement over ChatGPT.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Large language models (LLMs) can perform well on many tasks, but they risk generating hallucinations or wrong answers when dealing with tasks that require accurate knowledge.
- This issue becomes more noticeable when addressing logic queries that involve multiple reasoning steps.
- Knowledge graph (KG) based question answering methods can accurately identify correct answers using a knowledge graph, but their accuracy suffers when the knowledge graph is sparse and incomplete.
- Integrating knowledge graph reasoning with LLMs in a mutually beneficial way could help mitigate the hallucination problem of LLMs and the incompleteness issue of knowledge graphs.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models like ChatGPT are very good at understanding and generating human-like text. However, they can sometimes give inaccurate or made-up answers, especially when dealing with tasks that require precise knowledge or logical reasoning. On the other hand, knowledge graph-based question answering systems can provide accurate answers by using structured databases of information, but these databases may be incomplete or missing key facts.
This paper proposes a new approach called "Logic-Query-of-Thoughts" (LGOT) that combines the strengths of LLMs and knowledge graphs to tackle complex logic-based questions. LGOT breaks down the original question into smaller, easier-to-answer sub-questions. It then uses both the knowledge graph and the LLM to find the best answers for each sub-question. By putting these answers together, LGOT can solve the original complex question accurately, overcoming the limitations of using either LLMs or knowledge graphs alone.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel approach called "Logic-Query-of-Thoughts" (LGOT), which is the first to seamlessly integrate knowledge graph reasoning and large language models (LLMs) to tackle complex logic-based queries.
LGOT works by breaking down the original complex logic query into easier-to-answer sub-questions. It then leverages both the structured knowledge in a knowledge graph and the language understanding capabilities of an LLM to derive the most accurate answers for each sub-question. By aggregating these results and selecting the highest quality candidate answers, LGOT is able to arrive at an accurate final answer to the complex original question.
The authors' experimental findings demonstrate that LGOT achieves substantial performance improvements, with up to 20% higher accuracy compared to using ChatGPT alone on these types of logic-based tasks. This shows the value of interweaving conflicting knowledge reasoning skills in a complementary way to enhance the reasoning capabilities of large language models.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to addressing the limitations of both LLMs and knowledge graph-based systems when it comes to handling complex logic-based queries. By seamlessly combining these two techniques, LGOT is able to leverage their respective strengths to achieve significantly better performance.
However, the paper does not provide much detail on the specific knowledge graph used or the mechanism for selecting the highest quality answers from the sub-questions. Further research would be needed to understand the robustness of this approach and how it might scale to larger, more diverse knowledge graphs.
Additionally, the authors acknowledge that LGOT's performance is still not perfect, and there is room for improvement, particularly in handling cases where the knowledge graph is very sparse or incomplete. Exploring ways to further enhance the integration of LLMs and knowledge reasoning, perhaps through techniques like iterative refinement, could lead to even more substantial performance gains.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel "Logic-Query-of-Thoughts" (LGOT) approach that successfully combines the strengths of large language models and knowledge graph-based reasoning to tackle complex logic-based queries. By breaking down the original question into smaller sub-questions and leveraging both LLMs and knowledge graphs to derive the most accurate answers, LGOT is able to outperform using LLMs alone by up to 20%.
This work demonstrates the potential of interweaving different reasoning skills to enhance the capabilities of large language models and move closer to more robust, accurate, and trustworthy AI systems. Further research into scaling this approach and addressing its current limitations could lead to significant advancements in the field of question answering and logical reasoning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Reasoning on Efficient Knowledge Paths:Knowledge Graph Guides Large Language Model for Domain Question Answering
Yuqi Wang, Boran Jiang, Yi Luo, Dawei He, Peng Cheng, Liangcai Gao
0
0
Large language models (LLMs), such as GPT3.5, GPT4 and LLAMA2 perform surprisingly well and outperform human experts on many tasks. However, in many domain-specific evaluations, these LLMs often suffer from hallucination problems due to insufficient training of relevant corpus. Furthermore, fine-tuning large models may face problems such as the LLMs are not open source or the construction of high-quality domain instruction is difficult. Therefore, structured knowledge databases such as knowledge graph can better provide domain back- ground knowledge for LLMs and make full use of the reasoning and analysis capabilities of LLMs. In some previous works, LLM was called multiple times to determine whether the current triplet was suitable for inclusion in the subgraph when retrieving subgraphs through a question. Especially for the question that require a multi-hop reasoning path, frequent calls to LLM will consume a lot of computing power. Moreover, when choosing the reasoning path, LLM will be called once for each step, and if one of the steps is selected incorrectly, it will lead to the accumulation of errors in the following steps. In this paper, we integrated and optimized a pipeline for selecting reasoning paths from KG based on LLM, which can reduce the dependency on LLM. In addition, we propose a simple and effective subgraph retrieval method based on chain of thought (CoT) and page rank which can returns the paths most likely to contain the answer. We conduct experiments on three datasets: GenMedGPT-5k [14], WebQuestions [2], and CMCQA [21]. Finally, RoK can demonstrate that using fewer LLM calls can achieve the same results as previous SOTAs models.
4/17/2024
š
An Enhanced Prompt-Based LLM Reasoning Scheme via Knowledge Graph-Integrated Collaboration
Yihao Li, Ru Zhang, Jianyi Liu
0
0
While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional performance in a multitude of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, they encounter challenges in practical applications, including issues with hallucinations, inadequate knowledge updating, and limited transparency in the reasoning process. To overcome these limitations, this study innovatively proposes a collaborative training-free reasoning scheme involving tight cooperation between Knowledge Graph (KG) and LLMs. This scheme first involves using LLMs to iteratively explore KG, selectively retrieving a task-relevant knowledge subgraph to support reasoning. The LLMs are then guided to further combine inherent implicit knowledge to reason on the subgraph while explicitly elucidating the reasoning process. Through such a cooperative approach, our scheme achieves more reliable knowledge-based reasoning and facilitates the tracing of the reasoning results. Experimental results show that our scheme significantly progressed across multiple datasets, notably achieving over a 10% improvement on the QALD10 dataset compared to the best baseline and the fine-tuned state-of-the-art (SOTA) work. Building on this success, this study hopes to offer a valuable reference for future research in the fusion of KG and LLMs, thereby enhancing LLMs' proficiency in solving complex issues.
6/13/2024
Direct Evaluation of Chain-of-Thought in Multi-hop Reasoning with Knowledge Graphs
Minh-Vuong Nguyen, Linhao Luo, Fatemeh Shiri, Dinh Phung, Yuan-Fang Li, Thuy-Trang Vu, Gholamreza Haffari
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning abilities when prompted to generate chain-of-thought (CoT) explanations alongside answers. However, previous research on evaluating LLMs has solely focused on answer accuracy, neglecting the correctness of the generated CoT. In this paper, we delve deeper into the CoT reasoning capabilities of LLMs in multi-hop question answering by utilizing knowledge graphs (KGs). We propose a novel discriminative and generative CoT evaluation paradigm to assess LLMs' knowledge of reasoning and the accuracy of the generated CoT. Through experiments conducted on 5 different families of LLMs across 2 multi-hop question-answering datasets, we find that LLMs possess sufficient knowledge to perform reasoning. However, there exists a significant disparity between answer accuracy and faithfulness of the CoT reasoning generated by LLMs, indicating that they often arrive at correct answers through incorrect reasoning.
6/21/2024
Counter-intuitive: Large Language Models Can Better Understand Knowledge Graphs Than We Thought
Xinbang Dai, Yuncheng Hua, Tongtong Wu, Yang Sheng, Qiu Ji, Guilin Qi
0
0
As the parameter scale of large language models (LLMs) grows, jointly training knowledge graph (KG) embeddings with model parameters to enhance LLM capabilities becomes increasingly costly. Consequently, the community has shown interest in developing prompt strategies that effectively integrate KG information into LLMs. However, the format for incorporating KGs into LLMs lacks standardization; for instance, KGs can be transformed into linearized triples or natural language (NL) text. Current prompting methods often rely on a trial-and-error approach, leaving researchers with an incomplete understanding of which KG input format best facilitates LLM comprehension of KG content. To elucidate this, we design a series of experiments to explore LLMs' understanding of different KG input formats within the context of prompt engineering. Our analysis examines both literal and attention distribution levels. Through extensive experiments, we indicate a counter-intuitive phenomenon: when addressing fact-related questions, unordered linearized triples are more effective for LLMs' understanding of KGs compared to fluent NL text. Furthermore, noisy, incomplete, or marginally relevant subgraphs can still enhance LLM performance. Finally, different LLMs have distinct preferences for different formats of organizing unordered triples.
6/18/2024