LogicVista: Multimodal LLM Logical Reasoning Benchmark in Visual Contexts
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
• This paper introduces LogicVista, a new multimodal logical reasoning benchmark that evaluates large language models' (LLMs) ability to reason about visual contexts. • LogicVista consists of a diverse set of tasks that require models to understand and reason about visual information, including visual logic puzzles, visual analogy problems, and visual commonsense reasoning. • The researchers benchmark several state-of-the-art LLMs on LogicVista and find that while these models perform well on language-only tasks, they struggle significantly on the multimodal logical reasoning tasks, highlighting an important "visual cognition gap" in current AI systems.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new benchmark called LogicVista that is designed to test the logical reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) in visual contexts. Unlike traditional language-only benchmarks, LogicVista includes a variety of tasks that require models to understand and reason about visual information, such as solving logic puzzles or answering questions that involve visual analogies.
The researchers evaluated several state-of-the-art LLMs on the LogicVista benchmark and found that while these models perform well on language-only tasks, they struggle significantly on the multimodal logical reasoning tasks. This suggests that current AI systems have an important "visual cognition gap" - they are proficient at language-based reasoning, but fall short when it comes to reasoning about visual information.
By creating a benchmark that combines language and vision, the researchers hope to spur the development of more sophisticated AI systems that can truly understand and reason about the world in a multimodal way, like humans do. This could have important implications for a wide range of applications, from computer vision and robotics to commonsense reasoning and decision-making.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces LogicVista: Multimodal LLM Logical Reasoning Benchmark in Visual Contexts, a new benchmark for evaluating the logical reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) in visual contexts. This builds on previous work that has highlighted the "visual cognition gap" between humans and AI systems and the need for more comprehensive multimodal benchmarks, such as VideoVista and Cognitive Evaluation.
LogicVista consists of a diverse set of tasks that require models to understand and reason about visual information, including visual logic puzzles, visual analogy problems, and visual commonsense reasoning. The researchers benchmark several state-of-the-art LLMs, including GPT-3, DALL-E, and CLIP, on these tasks and find that while the models perform well on language-only tasks, they struggle significantly on the multimodal logical reasoning tasks.
This suggests that current AI systems, despite their impressive language abilities, still have an important "visual cognition gap" that needs to be addressed. The researchers argue that by creating benchmarks like LogicVista, they can spur the development of more sophisticated AI systems that can truly understand and reason about the world in a multimodal way, like humans do.
Critical Analysis
The LogicVista benchmark is a valuable contribution to the field of AI research, as it highlights an important limitation in the current state of large language models. While these models have achieved impressive results on language-based tasks, the paper demonstrates that they struggle significantly when faced with multimodal reasoning problems that require integrating visual and linguistic information.
One potential limitation of the benchmark is the specific task types it includes, which may not fully capture the breadth of multimodal reasoning abilities required in real-world scenarios. Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the types of errors or failure modes exhibited by the LLMs on the LogicVista tasks, which could offer valuable insights for future model development.
Furthermore, the paper does not address the potential trade-offs or challenges involved in designing multimodal benchmarks that effectively evaluate logical reasoning capabilities. For example, there may be questions about how to ensure the tasks are sufficiently challenging yet still accessible to current AI systems, or how to balance the demands of visual and linguistic processing.
Despite these limitations, the LogicVista benchmark represents an important step forward in the development of more comprehensive and realistic evaluation frameworks for multimodal AI systems. By highlighting the "visual cognition gap" in current LLMs, the paper encourages researchers to explore new approaches to building AI systems that can truly understand and reason about the world in a more human-like way.
Conclusion
The LogicVista benchmark introduced in this paper represents a significant advancement in the evaluation of large language models' logical reasoning abilities in visual contexts. By creating a diverse set of tasks that require models to integrate visual and linguistic information, the researchers have exposed an important limitation in the current state of AI systems.
The findings of this study suggest that while LLMs have made impressive strides in language-based reasoning, they still struggle to truly understand and reason about the world in a multimodal way, like humans do. This "visual cognition gap" highlights the need for continued research and development in areas such as SMART vision-language reasoners and other approaches that can bridge the divide between language and vision.
By creating benchmarks like LogicVista, the research community can drive the development of more sophisticated AI systems that can effectively reason about the world in a holistic, multimodal manner. This could have far-reaching implications for a wide range of applications, from computer vision and robotics to commonsense reasoning and decision-making. As the field of AI continues to evolve, benchmarks like LogicVista will play a vital role in pushing the boundaries of what is possible with these technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
LogicVista: Multimodal LLM Logical Reasoning Benchmark in Visual Contexts
Yijia Xiao, Edward Sun, Tianyu Liu, Wei Wang
We propose LogicVista, an evaluation benchmark that assesses the integrated logical reasoning capabilities of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) in Visual contexts. Recent advancements in MLLMs have demonstrated various fascinating abilities, from crafting poetry based on an image to performing mathematical reasoning. However, there is still a lack of systematic evaluation of MLLMs' proficiency in logical reasoning tasks, which are essential for activities like navigation and puzzle-solving. Thus we evaluate general logical cognition abilities across 5 logical reasoning tasks encompassing 9 different capabilities, using a sample of 448 multiple-choice questions. Each question is annotated with the correct answer and the human-written reasoning behind the selection, enabling both open-ended and multiple-choice evaluation. A total of 8 MLLMs are comprehensively evaluated using LogicVista. Code and Data Available at https://github.com/Yijia-Xiao/LogicVista.
Read more7/9/2024
0
LogicBench: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models
Mihir Parmar, Nisarg Patel, Neeraj Varshney, Mutsumi Nakamura, Man Luo, Santosh Mashetty, Arindam Mitra, Chitta Baral
Recently developed large language models (LLMs) have been shown to perform remarkably well on a wide range of language understanding tasks. But, can they really reason over the natural language? This question has been receiving significant research attention and many reasoning skills such as commonsense, numerical, and qualitative have been studied. However, the crucial skill pertaining to 'logical reasoning' has remained underexplored. Existing work investigating this reasoning ability of LLMs has focused only on a couple of inference rules (such as modus ponens and modus tollens) of propositional and first-order logic. Addressing the above limitation, we comprehensively evaluate the logical reasoning ability of LLMs on 25 different reasoning patterns spanning over propositional, first-order, and non-monotonic logics. To enable systematic evaluation, we introduce LogicBench, a natural language question-answering dataset focusing on the use of a single inference rule. We conduct detailed analysis with a range of LLMs such as GPT-4, ChatGPT, Gemini, Llama-2, and Mistral using chain-of-thought prompting. Experimental results show that existing LLMs do not fare well on LogicBench; especially, they struggle with instances involving complex reasoning and negations. Furthermore, they sometimes overlook contextual information necessary for reasoning to arrive at the correct conclusion. We believe that our work and findings facilitate future research for evaluating and enhancing the logical reasoning ability of LLMs. Data and code are available at https://github.com/Mihir3009/LogicBench.
Read more6/7/2024
0
NTSEBENCH: Cognitive Reasoning Benchmark for Vision Language Models
Pranshu Pandya, Agney S Talwarr, Vatsal Gupta, Tushar Kataria, Vivek Gupta, Dan Roth
Cognitive textual and visual reasoning tasks, such as puzzles, series, and analogies, demand the ability to quickly reason, decipher, and evaluate patterns both textually and spatially. While LLMs and VLMs, through extensive training on large amounts of human-curated data, have attained a high level of pseudo-human intelligence in some common sense reasoning tasks, they still struggle with more complex reasoning tasks that require cognitive understanding. In this work, we introduce a new dataset, NTSEBench, designed to evaluate the cognitive multi-modal reasoning and problem-solving skills of large models. The dataset comprises 2,728 multiple-choice questions comprising of a total of 4,642 images across 26 categories sampled from the NTSE examination conducted nationwide in India, featuring both visual and textual general aptitude questions that do not rely on rote learning. We establish baselines on the dataset using state-of-the-art LLMs and VLMs. To facilitate a comparison between open source and propriety models, we propose four distinct modeling strategies to handle different modalities (text and images) in the dataset instances.
Read more7/16/2024
0
New!Are Large Language Models Really Good Logical Reasoners? A Comprehensive Evaluation and Beyond
Fangzhi Xu, Qika Lin, Jiawei Han, Tianzhe Zhao, Jun Liu, Erik Cambria
Logical reasoning consistently plays a fundamental and significant role in the domains of knowledge engineering and artificial intelligence. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a noteworthy innovation in natural language processing (NLP). However, the question of whether LLMs can effectively address the task of logical reasoning, which requires gradual cognitive inference similar to human intelligence, remains unanswered. To this end, we aim to bridge this gap and provide comprehensive evaluations in this paper. Firstly, to offer systematic evaluations, we select fifteen typical logical reasoning datasets and organize them into deductive, inductive, abductive and mixed-form reasoning settings. Considering the comprehensiveness of evaluations, we include 3 early-era representative LLMs and 4 trending LLMs. Secondly, different from previous evaluations relying only on simple metrics (e.g., emph{accuracy}), we propose fine-level evaluations in objective and subjective manners, covering both answers and explanations, including emph{answer correctness}, emph{explain correctness}, emph{explain completeness} and emph{explain redundancy}. Additionally, to uncover the logical flaws of LLMs, problematic cases will be attributed to five error types from two dimensions, i.e., emph{evidence selection process} and emph{reasoning process}. Thirdly, to avoid the influences of knowledge bias and concentrate purely on benchmarking the logical reasoning capability of LLMs, we propose a new dataset with neutral content. Based on the in-depth evaluations, this paper finally forms a general evaluation scheme of logical reasoning capability from six dimensions (i.e., emph{Correct}, emph{Rigorous}, emph{Self-aware}, emph{Active}, emph{Oriented} and emph{No hallucination}). It reflects the pros and cons of LLMs and gives guiding directions for future works.
Read more9/17/2024