Managing multiple agents by automatically adjusting incentives
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Introduces a method for automatically adjusting incentives to manage multiple agents
- Focuses on optimizing delegation in collaborative human-AI hybrid teams
- Explores adaptive incentive design for learning agents in mixed-motive games
Plain English Explanation
This paper proposes a method for managing multiple agents by automatically adjusting incentives. The key idea is to create a system that can dynamically update the incentives or rewards offered to different agents, in order to encourage the desired behaviors and outcomes from a group of collaborating agents.
The optimizing delegation in collaborative human-AI hybrid teams is a specific application of this concept, where the system aims to find the right balance of responsibilities between human and AI team members.
More broadly, the research explores adaptive incentive design for learning agents in mixed-motive games. The goal is to design incentive schemes that can adapt over time as the agents learn and their behaviors change, in order to steer the multi-agent system towards desirable outcomes.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a framework for managing multiple agents by automatically adjusting incentives. The key components are:
- Agent Model: A model of each agent's preferences, capabilities, and decision-making process.
- Incentive Mechanism: A system for dynamically adjusting the rewards or incentives offered to each agent.
- Optimization Algorithm: A method for finding the optimal set of incentives to achieve the desired system-level objectives.
The authors apply this framework to the problem of optimizing delegation in collaborative human-AI hybrid teams. Here, the agent model captures the strengths and limitations of both human and AI team members, the incentive mechanism adjusts the tasks assigned to each, and the optimization algorithm finds the right balance of responsibilities.
More broadly, the paper explores adaptive incentive design for learning agents in mixed-motive games. The idea is to design incentive schemes that can dynamically adapt as the agents learn and their behaviors change, in order to steer the multi-agent system towards desirable outcomes.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a promising framework for managing multiple agents by automatically adjusting incentives. However, it acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research:
- The agent model may not fully capture the complex and sometimes irrational decision-making of human agents.
- The optimization algorithm may struggle to find optimal incentives in highly dynamic or unpredictable environments.
- The explaining decisions to agents in mixed-motive games can be challenging, potentially leading to mistrust or resistance from agents.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential ethical concerns around the use of automated incentive systems, such as the risk of manipulation or the unintended consequences of optimizing for narrow objectives.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to managing multiple agents by automatically adjusting incentives. By dynamically adapting the rewards and responsibilities of collaborating agents, the system aims to optimize overall performance and achieve desirable outcomes.
The research has broad implications for fields like collaborative human-AI hybrid teams and mixed-motive multi-agent systems, where the ability to fine-tune incentives can be a powerful tool for guiding complex behaviors. However, the approach also raises important ethical questions that warrant further exploration.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Managing multiple agents by automatically adjusting incentives
Shunichi Akatsuka, Yaemi Teramoto, Aaron Courville
In the coming years, AI agents will be used for making more complex decisions, including in situations involving many different groups of people. One big challenge is that AI agent tends to act in its own interest, unlike humans who often think about what will be the best for everyone in the long run. In this paper, we explore a method to get self-interested agents to work towards goals that benefit society as a whole. We propose a method to add a manager agent to mediate agent interactions by assigning incentives to certain actions. We tested our method with a supply-chain management problem and showed that this framework (1) increases the raw reward by 22.2%, (2) increases the agents' reward by 23.8%, and (3) increases the manager's reward by 20.1%.
Read more9/6/2024
👨🏫
0
Optimizing Delegation in Collaborative Human-AI Hybrid Teams
Andrew Fuchs, Andrea Passarella, Marco Conti
When humans and autonomous systems operate together as what we refer to as a hybrid team, we of course wish to ensure the team operates successfully and effectively. We refer to team members as agents. In our proposed framework, we address the case of hybrid teams in which, at any time, only one team member (the control agent) is authorized to act as control for the team. To determine the best selection of a control agent, we propose the addition of an AI manager (via Reinforcement Learning) which learns as an outside observer of the team. The manager learns a model of behavior linking observations of agent performance and the environment/world the team is operating in, and from these observations makes the most desirable selection of a control agent. We restrict the manager task by introducing a set of constraints. The manager constraints indicate acceptable team operation, so a violation occurs if the team enters a condition which is unacceptable and requires manager intervention. To ensure minimal added complexity or potential inefficiency for the team, the manager should attempt to minimize the number of times the team reaches a constraint violation and requires subsequent manager intervention. Therefore our manager is optimizing its selection of authorized agents to boost overall team performance while minimizing the frequency of manager intervention. We demonstrate our manager performance in a simulated driving scenario representing the case of a hybrid team of agents composed of a human driver and autonomous driving system. We perform experiments for our driving scenario with interfering vehicles, indicating the need for collision avoidance and proper speed control. Our results indicate a positive impact of our manager, with some cases resulting in increased team performance up to ~187% that of the best solo agent performance.
Read more8/27/2024
🤖
0
Artificial Intelligence and Dual Contract
Qian Qi
This paper explores the capacity of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to autonomously design incentive-compatible contracts in dual-principal-agent settings, a relatively unexplored aspect of algorithmic mechanism design. We develop a dynamic model where two principals, each equipped with independent Q-learning algorithms, interact with a single agent. Our findings reveal that the strategic behavior of AI principals (cooperation vs. competition) hinges crucially on the alignment of their profits. Notably, greater profit alignment fosters collusive strategies, yielding higher principal profits at the expense of agent incentives. This emergent behavior persists across varying degrees of principal heterogeneity, multiple principals, and environments with uncertainty. Our study underscores the potential of AI for contract automation while raising critical concerns regarding strategic manipulation and the emergence of unintended collusion in AI-driven systems, particularly in the context of the broader AI alignment problem.
Read more6/14/2024
📶
0
Explaining Decisions of Agents in Mixed-Motive Games
Maayan Orner, Oleg Maksimov, Akiva Kleinerman, Charles Ortiz, Sarit Kraus
In recent years, agents have become capable of communicating seamlessly via natural language and navigating in environments that involve cooperation and competition, a fact that can introduce social dilemmas. Due to the interleaving of cooperation and competition, understanding agents' decision-making in such environments is challenging, and humans can benefit from obtaining explanations. However, such environments and scenarios have rarely been explored in the context of explainable AI. While some explanation methods for cooperative environments can be applied in mixed-motive setups, they do not address inter-agent competition, cheap-talk, or implicit communication by actions. In this work, we design explanation methods to address these issues. Then, we proceed to demonstrate their effectiveness and usefulness for humans, using a non-trivial mixed-motive game as a test case. Lastly, we establish generality and demonstrate the applicability of the methods to other games, including one where we mimic human game actions using large language models.
Read more7/23/2024