Explaining Decisions of Agents in Mixed-Motive Games
0
📶
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Agents are now capable of communicating through natural language and navigating in environments that involve both cooperation and competition.
- This can lead to social dilemmas, as the interplay between cooperation and competition makes understanding the agents' decision-making challenging.
- Existing explanation methods for cooperative environments do not address issues like inter-agent competition, cheap-talk, or implicit communication through actions in mixed-motive setups.
- The paper aims to design explanation methods to address these challenges and demonstrate their effectiveness and usefulness for humans.
Plain English Explanation
In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) agents have become adept at communicating through natural language and navigating in environments that involve both cooperation and competition. This can lead to complex social dilemmas as the interplay between cooperation and competition makes it difficult to understand the agents' decision-making.
While some existing explanation methods for cooperative environments can be applied in these mixed-motive setups, they do not address the challenges posed by inter-agent competition, cheap-talk, or implicit communication through actions.
The paper aims to design new explanation methods to address these issues and demonstrate their effectiveness and usefulness for humans. The researchers use a non-trivial mixed-motive game as a test case to evaluate their approach, and they also show the generality of their methods by applying them to other games, including one where they mimic human game actions using large language models.
Technical Explanation
The paper focuses on developing explanation methods for mixed-motive environments where agents must navigate a balance of cooperation and competition. The researchers designed new explanation methods to address the challenges posed by inter-agent competition, cheap-talk, and implicit communication through actions.
To evaluate their approach, the researchers used a non-trivial mixed-motive game as a test case. They then demonstrated the generality of their methods by applying them to other games, including one where they used large language models to mimic human game actions.
The paper's key contributions are the design of new explanation methods that can effectively handle the complexities of mixed-motive environments and the empirical evaluation of their effectiveness and usefulness for humans.
Critical Analysis
The paper addresses an important and challenging problem in the field of explainable AI. By developing new explanation methods for mixed-motive environments, the researchers are helping to bridge the gap between the capabilities of AI agents and the need for human understanding and trust.
However, the paper does not explicitly discuss the potential limitations or caveats of their approach. For example, it would be helpful to understand the computational complexity of the explanation methods and how they scale as the size and complexity of the environment increases.
Additionally, the paper could have delved deeper into the implications of their work for real-world applications, such as human-robot collaboration or multi-agent decision-making in business or political contexts. Exploring these areas could lead to valuable insights and guide future research in this direction.
Conclusion
This paper presents a significant step forward in the development of explainable AI for mixed-motive environments. By designing new explanation methods that can handle the complexities of cooperation and competition, the researchers have made it easier for humans to understand and trust the decision-making of AI agents in these challenging scenarios.
The empirical evaluation of the methods using a non-trivial mixed-motive game and their application to other games, including one with language model-based human action mimicry, demonstrate the generality and practical usefulness of the approach. As human-agent collaboration becomes increasingly important in various domains, this work can have far-reaching implications for the development of trustworthy and transparent AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📶
0
Explaining Decisions of Agents in Mixed-Motive Games
Maayan Orner, Oleg Maksimov, Akiva Kleinerman, Charles Ortiz, Sarit Kraus
In recent years, agents have become capable of communicating seamlessly via natural language and navigating in environments that involve cooperation and competition, a fact that can introduce social dilemmas. Due to the interleaving of cooperation and competition, understanding agents' decision-making in such environments is challenging, and humans can benefit from obtaining explanations. However, such environments and scenarios have rarely been explored in the context of explainable AI. While some explanation methods for cooperative environments can be applied in mixed-motive setups, they do not address inter-agent competition, cheap-talk, or implicit communication by actions. In this work, we design explanation methods to address these issues. Then, we proceed to demonstrate their effectiveness and usefulness for humans, using a non-trivial mixed-motive game as a test case. Lastly, we establish generality and demonstrate the applicability of the methods to other games, including one where we mimic human game actions using large language models.
Read more7/23/2024
📊
0
Multi-Agent Strategy Explanations for Human-Robot Collaboration
Ravi Pandya, Michelle Zhao, Changliu Liu, Reid Simmons, Henny Admoni
As robots are deployed in human spaces, it is important that they are able to coordinate their actions with the people around them. Part of such coordination involves ensuring that people have a good understanding of how a robot will act in the environment. This can be achieved through explanations of the robot's policy. Much prior work in explainable AI and RL focuses on generating explanations for single-agent policies, but little has been explored in generating explanations for collaborative policies. In this work, we investigate how to generate multi-agent strategy explanations for human-robot collaboration. We formulate the problem using a generic multi-agent planner, show how to generate visual explanations through strategy-conditioned landmark states and generate textual explanations by giving the landmarks to an LLM. Through a user study, we find that when presented with explanations from our proposed framework, users are able to better explore the full space of strategies and collaborate more efficiently with new robot partners.
Read more7/2/2024
0
Explainable Human-AI Interaction: A Planning Perspective
Sarath Sreedharan, Anagha Kulkarni, Subbarao Kambhampati
From its inception, AI has had a rather ambivalent relationship with humans -- swinging between their augmentation and replacement. Now, as AI technologies enter our everyday lives at an ever increasing pace, there is a greater need for AI systems to work synergistically with humans. One critical requirement for such synergistic human-AI interaction is that the AI systems be explainable to the humans in the loop. To do this effectively, AI agents need to go beyond planning with their own models of the world, and take into account the mental model of the human in the loop. Drawing from several years of research in our lab, we will discuss how the AI agent can use these mental models to either conform to human expectations, or change those expectations through explanatory communication. While the main focus of the book is on cooperative scenarios, we will point out how the same mental models can be used for obfuscation and deception. Although the book is primarily driven by our own research in these areas, in every chapter, we will provide ample connections to relevant research from other groups.
Read more5/28/2024
🌿
0
Human-Agent Cooperation in Games under Incomplete Information through Natural Language Communication
Shenghui Chen, Daniel Fried, Ufuk Topcu
Developing autonomous agents that can strategize and cooperate with humans under information asymmetry is challenging without effective communication in natural language. We introduce a shared-control game, where two players collectively control a token in alternating turns to achieve a common objective under incomplete information. We formulate a policy synthesis problem for an autonomous agent in this game with a human as the other player. To solve this problem, we propose a communication-based approach comprising a language module and a planning module. The language module translates natural language messages into and from a finite set of flags, a compact representation defined to capture player intents. The planning module leverages these flags to compute a policy using an asymmetric information-set Monte Carlo tree search with flag exchange algorithm we present. We evaluate the effectiveness of this approach in a testbed based on Gnomes at Night, a search-and-find maze board game. Results of human subject experiments show that communication narrows the information gap between players and enhances human-agent cooperation efficiency with fewer turns.
Read more6/4/2024