Mapping the Challenges of HCI: An Application and Evaluation of ChatGPT and GPT-4 for Mining Insights at Scale

Read original: arXiv:2306.05036 - Published 7/8/2024 by Jonas Oppenlaender, Joonas Hamalainen
Total Score

0

šŸŒ€

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper examines the use of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and GPT-4 for mining insights from text corpora.
  • The researchers applied these LLMs to analyze the research challenges in the 2023 CHI conference proceedings, identifying over 4,000 challenges across 100 topics.
  • The paper evaluates the performance and cost-efficiency of using LLMs for this practical text analysis task, with implications for applying them in academia and industry.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at how powerful AI language models like ChatGPT and GPT-4 can be used to dig into large collections of text, like research papers, and pull out key insights. The researchers used these models to analyze the 2023 CHI conference proceedings - a major event in the field of human-computer interaction (HCI) - and identify over 4,000 distinct research challenges across 100 different topics.

This demonstrates how LLMs can be a powerful and cost-effective tool for quickly summarizing and making sense of huge amounts of text data, which could be really useful for researchers and practitioners in fields like HCI, programming, and beyond. The paper evaluates the strengths and limitations of using LLMs for this kind of practical text analysis task, providing insights that could inform how these powerful AI models are applied in the real world.

Technical Explanation

The researchers applied a combination of the ChatGPT and GPT-4 LLMs to analyze the text corpus of the 2023 CHI conference proceedings. They used the models to extract and categorize over 4,392 unique research challenges from the corpus, spanning more than 100 different topics within the field of HCI.

The process involved using the LLMs to:

  1. Extract relevant text snippets that described research challenges
  2. Cluster these snippets into coherent topics
  3. Summarize the key research challenges within each topic

The researchers then visualized the resulting taxonomy of research challenges to enable interactive exploration. Overall, they found that the LLM-based approach provided an efficient and cost-effective means of mining insights from the large text corpus, with potential applications for both academic research and industrial practice.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a compelling demonstration of how LLMs can be leveraged for practical text analysis tasks. However, the authors acknowledge some important limitations and caveats:

  • The models used, while powerful, are still closed-source and opaque, so their full capabilities and biases are not well understood.
  • The analysis was limited to a single conference corpus, so the generalizability to other domains or text sources is unclear.
  • The paper does not provide a direct comparison to human experts performing the same analysis task, so the relative performance is not quantified.

Additionally, one could argue that the reliance on LLMs introduces potential risks around privacy, security, and AI alignment that should be carefully considered, especially for applications in sensitive domains like academic research.

Overall, the research demonstrates the promise of LLMs for text analysis, but also highlights the need for continued scrutiny and responsible development of these powerful AI systems.

Conclusion

This paper showcases how large language models like ChatGPT and GPT-4 can be effectively leveraged for the practical task of mining insights from large text corpora. By applying these models to analyze the research challenges in the 2023 CHI conference proceedings, the researchers were able to extract a comprehensive taxonomy of over 4,000 challenges across 100 topics in the field of HCI.

The findings suggest that LLMs can provide a cost-efficient and scalable means of analyzing text data, with implications for both academic research and industry applications. However, the authors also identify important limitations and caveats around the transparency and potential risks of these powerful AI systems.

As LLMs continue to advance and see wider real-world use, this research highlights the need for careful evaluation and responsible development to ensure these technologies are applied in ways that are safe, ethical, and beneficial to society.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on š• ā†’

Related Papers

šŸŒ€

Total Score

0

Mapping the Challenges of HCI: An Application and Evaluation of ChatGPT and GPT-4 for Mining Insights at Scale

Jonas Oppenlaender, Joonas Hamalainen

Large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT and GPT-4, are gaining wide-spread real world use. Yet, these LLMs are closed source, and little is known about their performance in real-world use cases. In this paper, we apply and evaluate the combination of ChatGPT and GPT-4 for the real-world task of mining insights from a text corpus in order to identify research challenges in the field of HCI. We extract 4,392 research challenges in over 100 topics from the 2023~CHI conference proceedings and visualize the research challenges for interactive exploration. We critically evaluate the LLMs on this practical task and conclude that the combination of ChatGPT and GPT-4 makes an excellent cost-efficient means for analyzing a text corpus at scale. Cost-efficiency is key for flexibly prototyping research ideas and analyzing text corpora from different perspectives, with implications for applying LLMs for mining insights in academia and practice.

Read more

7/8/2024

šŸ’¬

Total Score

0

ChatGPT as an inventor: Eliciting the strengths and weaknesses of current large language models against humans in engineering design

Daniel Nyg{aa}rd Ege, Henrik H. {O}vreb{o}, Vegar Stubberud, Martin Francis Berg, Christer Elverum, Martin Steinert, H{aa}vard Vestad

This study compares the design practices and performance of ChatGPT 4.0, a large language model (LLM), against graduate engineering students in a 48-hour prototyping hackathon, based on a dataset comprising more than 100 prototypes. The LLM participated by instructing two participants who executed its instructions and provided objective feedback, generated ideas autonomously and made all design decisions without human intervention. The LLM exhibited similar prototyping practices to human participants and finished second among six teams, successfully designing and providing building instructions for functional prototypes. The LLM's concept generation capabilities were particularly strong. However, the LLM prematurely abandoned promising concepts when facing minor difficulties, added unnecessary complexity to designs, and experienced design fixation. Communication between the LLM and participants was challenging due to vague or unclear descriptions, and the LLM had difficulty maintaining continuity and relevance in answers. Based on these findings, six recommendations for implementing an LLM like ChatGPT in the design process are proposed, including leveraging it for ideation, ensuring human oversight for key decisions, implementing iterative feedback loops, prompting it to consider alternatives, and assigning specific and manageable tasks at a subsystem level.

Read more

4/30/2024

šŸ“Š

Total Score

0

Analyzing Chat Protocols of Novice Programmers Solving Introductory Programming Tasks with ChatGPT

Andreas Scholl, Daniel Schiffner, Natalie Kiesler

Large Language Models (LLMs) have taken the world by storm, and students are assumed to use related tools at a great scale. In this research paper we aim to gain an understanding of how introductory programming students chat with LLMs and related tools, e.g., ChatGPT-3.5. To address this goal, computing students at a large German university were motivated to solve programming exercises with the assistance of ChatGPT as part of their weekly introductory course exercises. Then students (n=213) submitted their chat protocols (with 2335 prompts in sum) as data basis for this analysis. The data was analyzed w.r.t. the prompts, frequencies, the chats' progress, contents, and other use pattern, which revealed a great variety of interactions, both potentially supportive and concerning. Learning about students' interactions with ChatGPT will help inform and align teaching practices and instructions for future introductory programming courses in higher education.

Read more

5/30/2024

A Qualitative Study on Using ChatGPT for Software Security: Perception vs. Practicality
Total Score

0

A Qualitative Study on Using ChatGPT for Software Security: Perception vs. Practicality

M. Mehdi Kholoosi, M. Ali Babar, Roland Croft

Artificial Intelligence (AI) advancements have enabled the development of Large Language Models (LLMs) that can perform a variety of tasks with remarkable semantic understanding and accuracy. ChatGPT is one such LLM that has gained significant attention due to its impressive capabilities for assisting in various knowledge-intensive tasks. Due to the knowledge-intensive nature of engineering secure software, ChatGPT's assistance is expected to be explored for security-related tasks during the development/evolution of software. To gain an understanding of the potential of ChatGPT as an emerging technology for supporting software security, we adopted a two-fold approach. Initially, we performed an empirical study to analyse the perceptions of those who had explored the use of ChatGPT for security tasks and shared their views on Twitter. It was determined that security practitioners view ChatGPT as beneficial for various software security tasks, including vulnerability detection, information retrieval, and penetration testing. Secondly, we designed an experiment aimed at investigating the practicality of this technology when deployed as an oracle in real-world settings. In particular, we focused on vulnerability detection and qualitatively examined ChatGPT outputs for given prompts within this prominent software security task. Based on our analysis, responses from ChatGPT in this task are largely filled with generic security information and may not be appropriate for industry use. To prevent data leakage, we performed this analysis on a vulnerability dataset compiled after the OpenAI data cut-off date from real-world projects covering 40 distinct vulnerability types and 12 programming languages. We assert that the findings from this study would contribute to future research aimed at developing and evaluating LLMs dedicated to software security.

Read more

8/2/2024