On margin-based generalization prediction in deep neural networks
2405.17445
0
0
🔮
Abstract
Understanding generalization in deep neural networks is an active area of research. A promising avenue of exploration has been that of margin measurements: the shortest distance to the decision boundary for a given sample or that sample's representation internal to the network. Margin-based complexity measures have been shown to be correlated with the generalization ability of deep neural networks in some circumstances but not others. The reasons behind the success or failure of these metrics are currently unclear. In this study, we examine margin-based generalization prediction methods in different settings. We motivate why these metrics sometimes fail to accurately predict generalization and how they can be improved. First, we analyze the relationship between margins measured in the input space and sample noise. We find that different types of sample noise can have a very different effect on the overall margin of a network that has modeled noisy data. Following this, we empirically evaluate how robust margins measured at different representational spaces are at predicting generalization. We find that these metrics have several limitations and that a large margin does not exhibit a strong correlation with empirical risk in many cases. Finally, we introduce a new margin-based measure that incorporates an approximation of the underlying data manifold. It is empirically demonstrated that this measure is generally more predictive of generalization than all other margin-based measures. Furthermore, we find that this measurement also outperforms other contemporary complexity measures on a well-known generalization prediction benchmark. In addition, we analyze the utility and limitations of this approach and find that this metric is well aligned with intuitions expressed in prior work.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This research paper examines the use of margin measurements, the distance to a classifier's decision boundary, as a way to predict the generalization ability of deep neural networks.
- The paper finds that margin-based complexity measures can successfully predict generalization in some cases, but fail in others, and aims to understand the reasons behind this.
- The paper introduces a new margin-based measure that incorporates an approximation of the underlying data manifold, and demonstrates that this measure is generally more predictive of generalization than other margin-based approaches.
Plain English Explanation
When training deep neural networks, one of the key challenges is understanding how well the network will perform on new, previously unseen data - a concept known as generalization. Researchers have explored the use of margin measurements, which quantify the distance between a data point and the decision boundary of the network, as a way to predict generalization ability.
The intuition is that networks with larger margins, meaning their decisions are further from the boundary, should be able to better generalize to new data. However, the researchers found that this relationship between margins and generalization doesn't always hold true.
To understand why, the paper first looks at how different types of noise in the training data can affect the overall margin of the network. It then empirically evaluates the robustness of margin-based metrics at predicting generalization, finding that they have several limitations.
The key contribution of the paper is the introduction of a new margin-based measure that incorporates an approximation of the underlying data manifold. This new metric is shown to be more predictive of generalization than other margin-based approaches, and even outperforms other contemporary complexity measures on a standard benchmark.
Technical Explanation
The paper first analyzes the relationship between margins measured in the input space and sample noise. They find that different types of noise (e.g. Gaussian, adversarial) can have very different effects on the overall margin of a network that has modeled the noisy data.
Next, the researchers empirically evaluate how robust margins measured at different representational spaces (e.g. input, hidden layers) are at predicting generalization. They find that these metrics have several limitations - a large margin does not always exhibit a strong correlation with empirical risk (a measure of generalization).
To address these shortcomings, the paper introduces a new margin-based measure that incorporates an approximation of the underlying data manifold. This metric attempts to capture the geometric structure of the data, in addition to the distance to the decision boundary.
The new measure is shown to be generally more predictive of generalization than all other margin-based measures evaluated. Furthermore, it outperforms other contemporary complexity measures on a well-known generalization prediction benchmark.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough analysis of the limitations of existing margin-based complexity measures and proposes a novel approach to address these issues. However, the authors acknowledge that their new metric also has some limitations.
Specifically, the manifold approximation used in the new measure relies on strong assumptions about the data distribution, which may not hold in all cases. Additionally, the computational complexity of the approach could be prohibitive for large-scale problems.
Further research is needed to understand the broader applicability of this method and to explore alternative ways of incorporating geometric information about the data into generalization prediction models. It would also be valuable to investigate the connection between margin-based measures and other complexity metrics, such as those based on information theory or the neural tangent kernel.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the understanding of generalization in deep neural networks and provides a promising direction for future work in this area.
Conclusion
This research paper offers a critical examination of the use of margin measurements as a way to predict the generalization ability of deep neural networks. While margin-based complexity measures have shown promise in some cases, the paper identifies key limitations and introduces a new approach that incorporates information about the underlying data manifold.
The new metric demonstrates improved performance in predicting generalization compared to existing margin-based and other contemporary complexity measures. This work advances our understanding of the factors that influence neural network generalization and provides a valuable tool for model selection and evaluation. Continued research in this area has the potential to yield important insights that will shape the development of more robust and generalizable deep learning systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
A Margin-based Multiclass Generalization Bound via Geometric Complexity
Michael Munn, Benoit Dherin, Javier Gonzalvo
0
0
There has been considerable effort to better understand the generalization capabilities of deep neural networks both as a means to unlock a theoretical understanding of their success as well as providing directions for further improvements. In this paper, we investigate margin-based multiclass generalization bounds for neural networks which rely on a recent complexity measure, the geometric complexity, developed for neural networks. We derive a new upper bound on the generalization error which scales with the margin-normalized geometric complexity of the network and which holds for a broad family of data distributions and model classes. Our generalization bound is empirically investigated for a ResNet-18 model trained with SGD on the CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 datasets with both original and random labels.
5/30/2024
🤿
Generalization analysis with deep ReLU networks for metric and similarity learning
Junyu Zhou, Puyu Wang, Ding-Xuan Zhou
0
0
While considerable theoretical progress has been devoted to the study of metric and similarity learning, the generalization mystery is still missing. In this paper, we study the generalization performance of metric and similarity learning by leveraging the specific structure of the true metric (the target function). Specifically, by deriving the explicit form of the true metric for metric and similarity learning with the hinge loss, we construct a structured deep ReLU neural network as an approximation of the true metric, whose approximation ability relies on the network complexity. Here, the network complexity corresponds to the depth, the number of nonzero weights and the computation units of the network. Consider the hypothesis space which consists of the structured deep ReLU networks, we develop the excess generalization error bounds for a metric and similarity learning problem by estimating the approximation error and the estimation error carefully. An optimal excess risk rate is derived by choosing the proper capacity of the constructed hypothesis space. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first-ever-known generalization analysis providing the excess generalization error for metric and similarity learning. In addition, we investigate the properties of the true metric of metric and similarity learning with general losses.
5/13/2024
Large Margin Discriminative Loss for Classification
Hai-Vy Nguyen, Fabrice Gamboa, Sixin Zhang, Reda Chhaibi, Serge Gratton, Thierry Giaccone
0
0
In this paper, we introduce a novel discriminative loss function with large margin in the context of Deep Learning. This loss boosts the discriminative power of neural nets, represented by intra-class compactness and inter-class separability. On the one hand, the class compactness is ensured by close distance of samples of the same class to each other. On the other hand, the inter-class separability is boosted by a margin loss that ensures the minimum distance of each class to its closest boundary. All the terms in our loss have an explicit meaning, giving a direct view of the feature space obtained. We analyze mathematically the relation between compactness and margin term, giving a guideline about the impact of the hyper-parameters on the learned features. Moreover, we also analyze properties of the gradient of the loss with respect to the parameters of the neural net. Based on this, we design a strategy called partial momentum updating that enjoys simultaneously stability and consistency in training. Furthermore, we also investigate generalization errors to have better theoretical insights. Our loss function systematically boosts the test accuracy of models compared to the standard softmax loss in our experiments.
5/30/2024
🐍
A separability-based approach to quantifying generalization: which layer is best?
Luciano Dyballa, Evan Gerritz, Steven W. Zucker
0
0
Generalization to unseen data remains poorly understood for deep learning classification and foundation models. How can one assess the ability of networks to adapt to new or extended versions of their input space in the spirit of few-shot learning, out-of-distribution generalization, and domain adaptation? Which layers of a network are likely to generalize best? We provide a new method for evaluating the capacity of networks to represent a sampled domain, regardless of whether the network has been trained on all classes in the domain. Our approach is the following: after fine-tuning state-of-the-art pre-trained models for visual classification on a particular domain, we assess their performance on data from related but distinct variations in that domain. Generalization power is quantified as a function of the latent embeddings of unseen data from intermediate layers for both unsupervised and supervised settings. Working throughout all stages of the network, we find that (i) high classification accuracy does not imply high generalizability; and (ii) deeper layers in a model do not always generalize the best, which has implications for pruning. Since the trends observed across datasets are largely consistent, we conclude that our approach reveals (a function of) the intrinsic capacity of the different layers of a model to generalize.
5/6/2024