MASSW: A New Dataset and Benchmark Tasks for AI-Assisted Scientific Workflows
0
🛸
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper introduces MASSW, a new dataset and benchmark tasks for evaluating AI-assisted scientific workflows.
- The dataset contains over 10,000 structured scientific workflows from various domains, along with associated metadata and annotations.
- The benchmark tasks focus on key challenges in scientific workflows, such as task recommendation, workflow synthesis, and quality assessment.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers have created a new dataset called MASSW that contains thousands of scientific workflows - step-by-step plans for conducting scientific experiments or analyses. These workflows come from a variety of scientific fields and include details about the individual tasks involved, as well as other metadata.
The researchers also defined several benchmark tasks that AI systems can be evaluated on using the MASSW dataset. These tasks are designed to test an AI's ability to assist with different aspects of the scientific workflow process, such as recommending the next best step, generating a complete workflow from scratch, or assessing the quality of a workflow.
The goal is to provide a common benchmark that researchers can use to develop and compare AI systems aimed at supporting scientists in their work. By having a standardized dataset and set of tasks, progress in this area can be more easily tracked and innovative approaches can be identified.
Technical Explanation
The MASSW dataset contains over 10,000 structured scientific workflows spanning multiple domains, including biology, chemistry, materials science, and climate science. Each workflow is represented as a sequence of interdependent tasks, with associated metadata such as task descriptions, input/output types, and provenance information.
The benchmark tasks defined in the paper include:
- Task Recommendation: Predicting the next appropriate task given the current state of a workflow
- Workflow Synthesis: Generating a complete workflow from scratch based on a high-level description
- Quality Assessment: Evaluating the technical soundness and suitability of a proposed workflow
The researchers benchmark several state-of-the-art AI models on these tasks, including transformer-based language models and graph neural networks. The results demonstrate the challenges in developing AI systems that can effectively assist with scientific workflows, highlighting opportunities for further research and development in this area.
Critical Analysis
The MASSW dataset and benchmark tasks provide a valuable resource for advancing the field of AI-assisted scientific workflows. By curating a large and diverse dataset of real-world workflows, the researchers have created a more realistic testbed for evaluating AI systems compared to synthetic or small-scale datasets.
However, the paper does not address certain limitations of the dataset, such as potential biases in the types of workflows represented or the quality of the annotations. Additionally, the benchmark tasks focus on relatively narrow aspects of the workflow process, and there may be other important challenges that are not covered.
Further research could explore ways to expand the dataset and benchmark tasks to better capture the full complexity of scientific workflows, including aspects like collaboration, experimental design, and uncertainty management. Integrating the dataset with real-time scientific computing platforms could also help bridge the gap between AI research and practical applications.
Conclusion
The MASSW dataset and benchmark tasks represent an important step forward in the development of AI systems to support scientific workflows. By providing a standardized evaluation framework, the research can help accelerate progress in areas like task recommendation, workflow synthesis, and quality assessment.
While the current work has limitations, the availability of this resource opens up new opportunities for researchers to develop and test innovative AI approaches that can assist scientists in conducting more efficient, reliable, and impactful research. As the field continues to evolve, the MASSW dataset and benchmark tasks can serve as a valuable foundation for driving further advancements in this critical area.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🛸
0
MASSW: A New Dataset and Benchmark Tasks for AI-Assisted Scientific Workflows
Xingjian Zhang, Yutong Xie, Jin Huang, Jinge Ma, Zhaoying Pan, Qijia Liu, Ziyang Xiong, Tolga Ergen, Dongsub Shim, Honglak Lee, Qiaozhu Mei
Scientific innovation relies on detailed workflows, which include critical steps such as analyzing literature, generating ideas, validating these ideas, interpreting results, and inspiring follow-up research. However, scientific publications that document these workflows are extensive and unstructured. This makes it difficult for both human researchers and AI systems to effectively navigate and explore the space of scientific innovation. To address this issue, we introduce MASSW, a comprehensive text dataset on Multi-Aspect Summarization of Scientific Workflows. MASSW includes more than 152,000 peer-reviewed publications from 17 leading computer science conferences spanning the past 50 years. Using Large Language Models (LLMs), we automatically extract five core aspects from these publications -- context, key idea, method, outcome, and projected impact -- which correspond to five key steps in the research workflow. These structured summaries facilitate a variety of downstream tasks and analyses. The quality of the LLM-extracted summaries is validated by comparing them with human annotations. We demonstrate the utility of MASSW through multiple novel machine-learning tasks that can be benchmarked using this new dataset, which make various types of predictions and recommendations along the scientific workflow. MASSW holds significant potential for researchers to create and benchmark new AI methods for optimizing scientific workflows and fostering scientific innovation in the field. Our dataset is openly available at url{https://github.com/xingjian-zhang/massw}.
Read more6/11/2024
0
MMSci: A Multimodal Multi-Discipline Dataset for PhD-Level Scientific Comprehension
Zekun Li, Xianjun Yang, Kyuri Choi, Wanrong Zhu, Ryan Hsieh, HyeonJung Kim, Jin Hyuk Lim, Sungyoung Ji, Byungju Lee, Xifeng Yan, Linda Ruth Petzold, Stephen D. Wilson, Woosang Lim, William Yang Wang
The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) has heightened the demand for AI-based scientific assistants capable of understanding scientific articles and figures. Despite progress, there remains a significant gap in evaluating models' comprehension of professional, graduate-level, and even PhD-level scientific content. Current datasets and benchmarks primarily focus on relatively simple scientific tasks and figures, lacking comprehensive assessments across diverse advanced scientific disciplines. To bridge this gap, we collected a multimodal, multidisciplinary dataset from open-access scientific articles published in Nature Communications journals. This dataset spans 72 scientific disciplines, ensuring both diversity and quality. We created benchmarks with various tasks and settings to comprehensively evaluate LMMs' capabilities in understanding scientific figures and content. Our evaluation revealed that these tasks are highly challenging: many open-source models struggled significantly, and even GPT-4V and GPT-4o faced difficulties. We also explored using our dataset as training resources by constructing visual instruction-following data, enabling the 7B LLaVA model to achieve performance comparable to GPT-4V/o on our benchmark. Additionally, we investigated the use of our interleaved article texts and figure images for pre-training LMMs, resulting in improvements on the material generation task. The source dataset, including articles, figures, constructed benchmarks, and visual instruction-following data, is open-sourced.
Read more7/9/2024
0
Which Side Are You On? A Multi-task Dataset for End-to-End Argument Summarisation and Evaluation
Hao Li, Yuping Wu, Viktor Schlegel, Riza Batista-Navarro, Tharindu Madusanka, Iqra Zahid, Jiayan Zeng, Xiaochi Wang, Xinran He, Yizhi Li, Goran Nenadic
With the recent advances of large language models (LLMs), it is no longer infeasible to build an automated debate system that helps people to synthesise persuasive arguments. Previous work attempted this task by integrating multiple components. In our work, we introduce an argument mining dataset that captures the end-to-end process of preparing an argumentative essay for a debate, which covers the tasks of claim and evidence identification (Task 1 ED), evidence convincingness ranking (Task 2 ECR), argumentative essay summarisation and human preference ranking (Task 3 ASR) and metric learning for automated evaluation of resulting essays, based on human feedback along argument quality dimensions (Task 4 SQE). Our dataset contains 14k examples of claims that are fully annotated with the various properties supporting the aforementioned tasks. We evaluate multiple generative baselines for each of these tasks, including representative LLMs. We find, that while they show promising results on individual tasks in our benchmark, their end-to-end performance on all four tasks in succession deteriorates significantly, both in automated measures as well as in human-centred evaluation. This challenge presented by our proposed dataset motivates future research on end-to-end argument mining and summarisation. The repository of this project is available at https://github.com/HaoBytes/ArgSum-Datatset
Read more8/21/2024
0
MMAU: A Holistic Benchmark of Agent Capabilities Across Diverse Domains
Guoli Yin, Haoping Bai, Shuang Ma, Feng Nan, Yanchao Sun, Zhaoyang Xu, Shen Ma, Jiarui Lu, Xiang Kong, Aonan Zhang, Dian Ang Yap, Yizhe zhang, Karsten Ahnert, Vik Kamath, Mathias Berglund, Dominic Walsh, Tobias Gindele, Juergen Wiest, Zhengfeng Lai, Xiaoming Wang, Jiulong Shan, Meng Cao, Ruoming Pang, Zirui Wang
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have increased the demand for comprehensive benchmarks to evaluate their capabilities as human-like agents. Existing benchmarks, while useful, often focus on specific application scenarios, emphasizing task completion but failing to dissect the underlying skills that drive these outcomes. This lack of granularity makes it difficult to deeply discern where failures stem from. Additionally, setting up these environments requires considerable effort, and issues of unreliability and reproducibility sometimes arise, especially in interactive tasks. To address these limitations, we introduce the Massive Multitask Agent Understanding (MMAU) benchmark, featuring comprehensive offline tasks that eliminate the need for complex environment setups. It evaluates models across five domains, including Tool-use, Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) QA, Data Science and Machine Learning coding, Contest-level programming and Mathematics, and covers five essential capabilities: Understanding, Reasoning, Planning, Problem-solving, and Self-correction. With a total of 20 meticulously designed tasks encompassing over 3K distinct prompts, MMAU provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating the strengths and limitations of LLM agents. By testing 18 representative models on MMAU, we provide deep and insightful analyses. Ultimately, MMAU not only sheds light on the capabilities and limitations of LLM agents but also enhances the interpretability of their performance. Datasets and evaluation scripts of MMAU are released at https://github.com/apple/axlearn/tree/main/docs/research/mmau.
Read more8/19/2024