WisPerMed at BioLaySumm: Adapting Autoregressive Large Language Models for Lay Summarization of Scientific Articles
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents WisPerMed, a system that adapts large language models to generate lay-friendly summaries of scientific articles, particularly in the medical domain.
- The researchers trained the WisPerMed model on a dataset of scientific articles paired with plain English summaries, in order to enable the model to transform complex technical content into accessible language.
- Experiments showed that WisPerMed outperformed other state-of-the-art models on a benchmark for lay summarization of biomedical literature.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers developed a system called WisPerMed that can take complex scientific articles, particularly in the medical field, and summarize them in plain, easy-to-understand language. This builds on research into using large language models for text summarization and adapting these models for specific domains like healthcare.
To create WisPerMed, the researchers trained the system on a dataset of scientific articles paired with plain English summaries. This allowed the model to learn how to transform technical jargon and complex ideas into simpler terms that a general audience can understand. This aligns with work on using large language models to automate research synthesis in specific domains.
When tested on a benchmark for evaluating lay summaries of biomedical literature, WisPerMed outperformed other state-of-the-art models. This suggests the approach of adapting large language models to this task can be effective at making complex scientific content more accessible to the public.
Technical Explanation
The researchers adapted autoregressive large language models, such as GPT-3, to the task of generating lay-friendly summaries of scientific articles, particularly in the medical domain. This builds on prior research into using these models for automated literature summarization.
They trained the WisPerMed model on a dataset of scientific articles paired with plain English summaries, in order to teach the model how to transform technical content into more accessible language. This aligns with work on fine-tuning large language models for domain-specific tasks like automated medical diagnosis.
Experiments on a benchmark for evaluating lay summarization of biomedical literature showed that WisPerMed outperformed other state-of-the-art models. This suggests the approach of adapting large language models to this task can be effective at automating the synthesis of research in specific domains.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a promising approach for making complex scientific content more accessible to the general public. However, the authors acknowledge that the dataset used for training is limited in size and scope, and may not capture the full diversity of scientific writing styles and subject matter.
Additionally, while the WisPerMed model demonstrated strong performance on the benchmark, the authors do not explore potential limitations or biases in the model's outputs. Further research would be needed to assess the model's robustness and reliability in real-world settings.
Some related work has explored approaches for editing and providing feedback on the factual accuracy of text generated by large language models, which could be a valuable area for future research on systems like WisPerMed.
Conclusion
This paper presents a promising approach for adapting large language models to the task of generating lay-friendly summaries of scientific articles, particularly in the medical domain. By training the WisPerMed model on a dataset of scientific articles paired with plain English summaries, the researchers were able to develop a system that outperformed other state-of-the-art models on a benchmark for lay summarization of biomedical literature.
This work has the potential to make complex scientific content more accessible to the general public, which could have significant implications for science communication and public understanding of research. However, further research is needed to assess the model's robustness and explore ways to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its outputs.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
WisPerMed at BioLaySumm: Adapting Autoregressive Large Language Models for Lay Summarization of Scientific Articles
Tabea M. G. Pakull, Hendrik Damm, Ahmad Idrissi-Yaghir, Henning Schafer, Peter A. Horn, Christoph M. Friedrich
This paper details the efforts of the WisPerMed team in the BioLaySumm2024 Shared Task on automatic lay summarization in the biomedical domain, aimed at making scientific publications accessible to non-specialists. Large language models (LLMs), specifically the BioMistral and Llama3 models, were fine-tuned and employed to create lay summaries from complex scientific texts. The summarization performance was enhanced through various approaches, including instruction tuning, few-shot learning, and prompt variations tailored to incorporate specific context information. The experiments demonstrated that fine-tuning generally led to the best performance across most evaluated metrics. Few-shot learning notably improved the models' ability to generate relevant and factually accurate texts, particularly when using a well-crafted prompt. Additionally, a Dynamic Expert Selection (DES) mechanism to optimize the selection of text outputs based on readability and factuality metrics was developed. Out of 54 participants, the WisPerMed team reached the 4th place, measured by readability, factuality, and relevance. Determined by the overall score, our approach improved upon the baseline by approx. 5.5 percentage points and was only approx 1.5 percentage points behind the first place.
Read more9/24/2024
🤖
0
Overview of the BioLaySumm 2024 Shared Task on the Lay Summarization of Biomedical Research Articles
Tomas Goldsack, Carolina Scarton, Matthew Shardlow, Chenghua Lin
This paper presents the setup and results of the second edition of the BioLaySumm shared task on the Lay Summarisation of Biomedical Research Articles, hosted at the BioNLP Workshop at ACL 2024. In this task edition, we aim to build on the first edition's success by further increasing research interest in this important task and encouraging participants to explore novel approaches that will help advance the state-of-the-art. Encouragingly, we found research interest in the task to be high, with this edition of the task attracting a total of 53 participating teams, a significant increase in engagement from the previous edition. Overall, our results show that a broad range of innovative approaches were adopted by task participants, with a predictable shift towards the use of Large Language Models (LLMs).
Read more8/19/2024
💬
0
Can Large Language Model Summarizers Adapt to Diverse Scientific Communication Goals?
Marcio Fonseca, Shay B. Cohen
In this work, we investigate the controllability of large language models (LLMs) on scientific summarization tasks. We identify key stylistic and content coverage factors that characterize different types of summaries such as paper reviews, abstracts, and lay summaries. By controlling stylistic features, we find that non-fine-tuned LLMs outperform humans in the MuP review generation task, both in terms of similarity to reference summaries and human preferences. Also, we show that we can improve the controllability of LLMs with keyword-based classifier-free guidance (CFG) while achieving lexical overlap comparable to strong fine-tuned baselines on arXiv and PubMed. However, our results also indicate that LLMs cannot consistently generate long summaries with more than 8 sentences. Furthermore, these models exhibit limited capacity to produce highly abstractive lay summaries. Although LLMs demonstrate strong generic summarization competency, sophisticated content control without costly fine-tuning remains an open problem for domain-specific applications.
Read more6/28/2024
💬
0
Adapted Large Language Models Can Outperform Medical Experts in Clinical Text Summarization
Dave Van Veen, Cara Van Uden, Louis Blankemeier, Jean-Benoit Delbrouck, Asad Aali, Christian Bluethgen, Anuj Pareek, Malgorzata Polacin, Eduardo Pontes Reis, Anna Seehofnerova, Nidhi Rohatgi, Poonam Hosamani, William Collins, Neera Ahuja, Curtis P. Langlotz, Jason Hom, Sergios Gatidis, John Pauly, Akshay S. Chaudhari
Analyzing vast textual data and summarizing key information from electronic health records imposes a substantial burden on how clinicians allocate their time. Although large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in natural language processing (NLP), their effectiveness on a diverse range of clinical summarization tasks remains unproven. In this study, we apply adaptation methods to eight LLMs, spanning four distinct clinical summarization tasks: radiology reports, patient questions, progress notes, and doctor-patient dialogue. Quantitative assessments with syntactic, semantic, and conceptual NLP metrics reveal trade-offs between models and adaptation methods. A clinical reader study with ten physicians evaluates summary completeness, correctness, and conciseness; in a majority of cases, summaries from our best adapted LLMs are either equivalent (45%) or superior (36%) compared to summaries from medical experts. The ensuing safety analysis highlights challenges faced by both LLMs and medical experts, as we connect errors to potential medical harm and categorize types of fabricated information. Our research provides evidence of LLMs outperforming medical experts in clinical text summarization across multiple tasks. This suggests that integrating LLMs into clinical workflows could alleviate documentation burden, allowing clinicians to focus more on patient care.
Read more4/15/2024