Mastering Zero-Shot Interactions in Cooperative and Competitive Simultaneous Games

Read original: arXiv:2402.03136 - Published 6/12/2024 by Yannik Mahlau, Frederik Schubert, Bodo Rosenhahn
Total Score

0

📉

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper explores how to adapt self-play and planning algorithms like AlphaZero to simultaneous games, where agents may take different actions concurrently.
  • Missing information about other agents' actions is a key challenge, as it can lead to suboptimal play or the selection of different Nash equilibria.
  • The authors propose Albatross, an algorithm that learns to play a novel equilibrium concept called Smooth Best Response Logit Equilibrium (SBRLE) to enable cooperation and competition with agents of any skill level.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on a common problem in game AI: how to create agents that can play well in simultaneous games, where multiple players make moves at the same time. This is a tricky challenge because the agent doesn't know what the other players will do, which can lead to suboptimal strategies.

To address this, the researchers developed a new algorithm called Albatross. Albatross learns to play what they call a "Smooth Best Response Logit Equilibrium" (SBRLE). This allows the agent to cooperate and compete effectively with other players, even if they are weaker or stronger.

The researchers tested Albatross on a variety of simultaneous games, including cooperative games like Overcooked and competitive games like Battlesnake. They found that Albatross could exploit weaker opponents in the competitive game, and performed 37.6% better than previous state-of-the-art on the cooperative Overcooked benchmark.

The key innovation is that Albatross can model the behavior of other agents, even when their actions are unknown. This allows it to adapt its strategy and find the best way to interact with them, whether that means cooperating or competing.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a new algorithm called Albatross that extends self-play and planning techniques like AlphaZero to simultaneous games. In these games, agents make moves concurrently, and the lack of information about other agents' actions is a major challenge.

Albatross learns to play a novel equilibrium concept called Smooth Best Response Logit Equilibrium (SBRLE). This allows the agent to model the behavior of other players, even if they are not playing optimally. The SBRLE enables Albatross to cooperate or compete effectively with agents of any skill level.

The researchers evaluated Albatross on a range of simultaneous perfect-information games, including the cooperative Overcooked and the competitive Battlesnake. In contrast to AlphaZero, Albatross was able to exploit weaker opponents in Battlesnake. Additionally, Albatross achieved a 37.6% improvement over the previous state-of-the-art on the Overcooked benchmark.

The key technical innovation is Albatross' ability to model other agents' behavior, even when their actions are unknown. This allows it to adapt its strategy to find the best way to interact with them, whether that means cooperating or competing. The SBRLE equilibrium concept enables this by providing a framework for reasoning about other agents' likely responses.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to addressing the challenge of simultaneous games, where missing information about other agents' actions is a key obstacle. The Albatross algorithm and the SBRLE equilibrium concept are innovative solutions that demonstrate the potential for adapting self-play and planning techniques to these more complex multi-agent settings.

One potential limitation is the focus on perfect-information games. In real-world scenarios, agents may have access to noisy or incomplete information about the state of the game and the actions of other players. Extending Albatross to handle such partial observability could further expand its applicability.

Additionally, the paper does not discuss the computational complexity or training time of Albatross compared to other approaches. As these factors can be critical in practical applications, a more detailed analysis of the algorithm's efficiency would be valuable.

Finally, while the results on the Overcooked and Battlesnake benchmarks are impressive, it would be interesting to see how Albatross performs on a wider range of simultaneous games, including those with more complex dynamics or larger state and action spaces. Exploring the generalizability of the approach would help assess its broader impact.

Overall, the Albatross algorithm and the SBRLE equilibrium concept represent a significant contribution to the field of multi-agent reinforcement learning. By enabling agents to reason about and adapt to the behavior of other players, this research takes an important step towards more intelligent and versatile game-playing systems.

Conclusion

The paper introduces Albatross, a novel algorithm that extends self-play and planning techniques to simultaneous games. By learning to play a Smooth Best Response Logit Equilibrium (SBRLE), Albatross can cooperate and compete effectively with agents of varying skill levels, even when their actions are not fully known.

The results demonstrate that Albatross can outperform previous state-of-the-art approaches on both cooperative and competitive simultaneous games. This suggests that the ability to model other agents' behavior is a crucial capability for artificial agents operating in complex, multi-agent environments.

The research presented in this paper represents an important step forward in the field of multi-agent reinforcement learning. By addressing the challenges of simultaneous games, it paves the way for the development of more sophisticated and versatile game-playing systems that can thrive in realistic, interactive scenarios. The potential applications of this work extend beyond games, with implications for a wide range of real-world multi-agent systems, such as autonomous vehicles, robotics, and resource allocation.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📉

Total Score

0

Mastering Zero-Shot Interactions in Cooperative and Competitive Simultaneous Games

Yannik Mahlau, Frederik Schubert, Bodo Rosenhahn

The combination of self-play and planning has achieved great successes in sequential games, for instance in Chess and Go. However, adapting algorithms such as AlphaZero to simultaneous games poses a new challenge. In these games, missing information about concurrent actions of other agents is a limiting factor as they may select different Nash equilibria or do not play optimally at all. Thus, it is vital to model the behavior of the other agents when interacting with them in simultaneous games. To this end, we propose Albatross: AlphaZero for Learning Bounded-rational Agents and Temperature-based Response Optimization using Simulated Self-play. Albatross learns to play the novel equilibrium concept of a Smooth Best Response Logit Equilibrium (SBRLE), which enables cooperation and competition with agents of any playing strength. We perform an extensive evaluation of Albatross on a set of cooperative and competitive simultaneous perfect-information games. In contrast to AlphaZero, Albatross is able to exploit weak agents in the competitive game of Battlesnake. Additionally, it yields an improvement of 37.6% compared to previous state of the art in the cooperative Overcooked benchmark.

Read more

6/12/2024

AlphaZeroES: Direct score maximization outperforms planning loss minimization
Total Score

0

AlphaZeroES: Direct score maximization outperforms planning loss minimization

Carlos Martin, Tuomas Sandholm

Planning at execution time has been shown to dramatically improve performance for agents in both single-agent and multi-agent settings. A well-known family of approaches to planning at execution time are AlphaZero and its variants, which use Monte Carlo Tree Search together with a neural network that guides the search by predicting state values and action probabilities. AlphaZero trains these networks by minimizing a planning loss that makes the value prediction match the episode return, and the policy prediction at the root of the search tree match the output of the full tree expansion. AlphaZero has been applied to both single-agent environments (such as Sokoban) and multi-agent environments (such as chess and Go) with great success. In this paper, we explore an intriguing question: In single-agent environments, can we outperform AlphaZero by directly maximizing the episode score instead of minimizing this planning loss, while leaving the MCTS algorithm and neural architecture unchanged? To directly maximize the episode score, we use evolution strategies, a family of algorithms for zeroth-order blackbox optimization. Our experiments indicate that, across multiple environments, directly maximizing the episode score outperforms minimizing the planning loss.

Read more

6/14/2024

🔗

Total Score

0

MiniZero: Comparative Analysis of AlphaZero and MuZero on Go, Othello, and Atari Games

Ti-Rong Wu, Hung Guei, Pei-Chiun Peng, Po-Wei Huang, Ting Han Wei, Chung-Chin Shih, Yun-Jui Tsai

This paper presents MiniZero, a zero-knowledge learning framework that supports four state-of-the-art algorithms, including AlphaZero, MuZero, Gumbel AlphaZero, and Gumbel MuZero. While these algorithms have demonstrated super-human performance in many games, it remains unclear which among them is most suitable or efficient for specific tasks. Through MiniZero, we systematically evaluate the performance of each algorithm in two board games, 9x9 Go and 8x8 Othello, as well as 57 Atari games. For two board games, using more simulations generally results in higher performance. However, the choice of AlphaZero and MuZero may differ based on game properties. For Atari games, both MuZero and Gumbel MuZero are worth considering. Since each game has unique characteristics, different algorithms and simulations yield varying results. In addition, we introduce an approach, called progressive simulation, which progressively increases the simulation budget during training to allocate computation more efficiently. Our empirical results demonstrate that progressive simulation achieves significantly superior performance in two board games. By making our framework and trained models publicly available, this paper contributes a benchmark for future research on zero-knowledge learning algorithms, assisting researchers in algorithm selection and comparison against these zero-knowledge learning baselines. Our code and data are available at https://rlg.iis.sinica.edu.tw/papers/minizero.

Read more

4/29/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Towards Principled Superhuman AI for Multiplayer Symmetric Games

Jiawei Ge, Yuanhao Wang, Wenzhe Li, Chi Jin

Multiplayer games, when the number of players exceeds two, present unique challenges that fundamentally distinguish them from the extensively studied two-player zero-sum games. These challenges arise from the non-uniqueness of equilibria and the risk of agents performing highly suboptimally when adopting equilibrium strategies. While a line of recent works developed learning systems successfully achieving human-level or even superhuman performance in popular multiplayer games such as Mahjong, Poker, and Diplomacy, two critical questions remain unaddressed: (1) What is the correct solution concept that AI agents should find? and (2) What is the general algorithmic framework that provably solves all games within this class? This paper takes the first step towards solving these unique challenges of multiplayer games by provably addressing both questions in multiplayer symmetric normal-form games. We also demonstrate that many meta-algorithms developed in prior practical systems for multiplayer games can fail to achieve even the basic goal of obtaining agent's equal share of the total reward.

Read more

6/7/2024