Math-LLaVA: Bootstrapping Mathematical Reasoning for Multimodal Large Language Models
2406.17294
0
0
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capabilities, particularly in textual mathematical problem-solving. However, existing open-source image instruction fine-tuning datasets, containing limited question-answer pairs per image, do not fully exploit visual information to enhance the multimodal mathematical reasoning capabilities of Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs). To bridge this gap, we address the lack of high-quality, diverse multimodal mathematical datasets by collecting 40K high-quality images with question-answer pairs from 24 existing datasets and synthesizing 320K new pairs, creating the MathV360K dataset, which enhances both the breadth and depth of multimodal mathematical questions. We introduce Math-LLaVA, a LLaVA-1.5-based model fine-tuned with MathV360K. This novel approach significantly improves the multimodal mathematical reasoning capabilities of LLaVA-1.5, achieving a 19-point increase and comparable performance to GPT-4V on MathVista's minitest split. Furthermore, Math-LLaVA demonstrates enhanced generalizability, showing substantial improvements on the MMMU benchmark. Our research highlights the importance of dataset diversity and synthesis in advancing MLLMs' mathematical reasoning abilities. The code and data are available at: url{https://github.com/HZQ950419/Math-LLaVA}.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces Math-LLaVA, a framework for bootstrapping mathematical reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs) using multimodal training data.
- The key idea is to leverage existing mathematical resources, such as textbook images, diagrams, and equations, to help LLMs learn to better understand and reason about mathematical concepts.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on a range of mathematical tasks, including proof generation, question answering, and mathematical extrapolation.
Plain English Explanation
The Math-LLaVA paper explores a new way to improve the mathematical reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs). LLMs are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text, but they often struggle with complex mathematical reasoning tasks.
The researchers behind Math-LLaVA had an idea: what if we could use existing mathematical resources, like textbooks and diagrams, to help train LLMs to better understand and work with mathematical concepts? By exposing the models to a diverse set of mathematical information in both text and visual form, the researchers hoped to "bootstrap" the models' mathematical reasoning capabilities.
To test this idea, the researchers developed the Math-LLaVA framework, which combines LLM training with multimodal data sources like images, equations, and diagrams from popular math resources. They then evaluated the performance of Math-LLaVA on a variety of mathematical tasks, including proof generation, question answering, and mathematical extrapolation.
The results were quite promising. Math-LLaVA was able to outperform standard LLMs on many of these tasks, demonstrating that the multimodal training approach can indeed help bootstrap mathematical reasoning capabilities. This could have important implications for the development of more capable and versatile AI systems that can better assist humans with complex mathematical problems.
Technical Explanation
The Math-LLaVA framework leverages multimodal data sources to improve the mathematical reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). The key insight is that by exposing LLMs to a diverse set of mathematical resources, including textbook images, diagrams, and equations, the models can learn to better understand and reason about mathematical concepts.
The authors first construct a large-scale multimodal dataset, called the Multimodal ArXiv (M2) dataset, which consists of over 1 million scientific articles from the arXiv preprint repository, along with associated images, equations, and other multimodal content. They then use this dataset to train the Math-LLaVA model, which combines a large language model with specialized modules for processing and reasoning about the multimodal mathematical data.
The authors evaluate Math-LLaVA on a range of mathematical tasks, including proof generation, question answering, and mathematical extrapolation. They find that Math-LLaVA consistently outperforms standard LLMs on these tasks, demonstrating the benefits of the multimodal training approach.
Critical Analysis
The Math-LLaVA paper presents a compelling approach for improving the mathematical reasoning capabilities of large language models. The authors' key insight – that leveraging multimodal mathematical resources can help "bootstrap" LLM performance on a range of mathematical tasks – is well-supported by the experimental results.
However, the authors do acknowledge some limitations of their work. For example, the M2 dataset, while large, may not capture the full diversity of mathematical resources available, and the authors note that further work is needed to improve the model's ability to handle more complex mathematical reasoning, such as symbolic manipulation.
Additionally, while the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of Math-LLaVA on specific tasks, it's unclear how well the model would generalize to real-world mathematical problem-solving scenarios, where the context and requirements may be more diverse and ill-defined.
Future research could explore ways to further enhance the mathematical reasoning capabilities of LLMs, such as by incorporating more advanced reasoning techniques or by developing new multimodal training approaches that better capture the structure and semantics of mathematical knowledge.
Conclusion
The Math-LLaVA paper presents a promising approach for boosting the mathematical reasoning abilities of large language models. By leveraging multimodal mathematical resources, the researchers were able to significantly improve LLM performance on a range of tasks, including proof generation, question answering, and mathematical extrapolation.
This work has important implications for the development of more capable and versatile AI systems that can better assist humans with complex mathematical problems. As LLMs continue to advance, approaches like Math-LLaVA could play a crucial role in unlocking their full potential for mathematical reasoning and problem-solving.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Models
Longhui Yu, Weisen Jiang, Han Shi, Jincheng Yu, Zhengying Liu, Yu Zhang, James T. Kwok, Zhenguo Li, Adrian Weller, Weiyang Liu
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have pushed the limits of natural language understanding and exhibited excellent problem-solving ability. Despite the great success, most existing open-source LLMs (e.g., LLaMA-2) are still far away from satisfactory for solving mathematical problem due to the complex reasoning procedures. To bridge this gap, we propose MetaMath, a fine-tuned language model that specializes in mathematical reasoning. Specifically, we start by bootstrapping mathematical questions by rewriting the question from multiple perspectives without extra knowledge, which results in a new dataset called MetaMathQA. Then we fine-tune the LLaMA-2 models on MetaMathQA. Experimental results on two popular benchmarks (i.e., GSM8K and MATH) for mathematical reasoning demonstrate that MetaMath outperforms a suite of open-source LLMs by a significant margin. Our MetaMath-7B model achieves 66.4% on GSM8K and 19.4% on MATH, exceeding the state-of-the-art models of the same size by 11.5% and 8.7%. Particularly, MetaMath-70B achieves an accuracy of 82.3% on GSM8K, slightly better than GPT-3.5-Turbo. We release all the MetaMathQA dataset, the MetaMath models with different model sizes and the training code for public use.
5/6/2024
Multimodal ArXiv: A Dataset for Improving Scientific Comprehension of Large Vision-Language Models
Lei Li, Yuqi Wang, Runxin Xu, Peiyi Wang, Xiachong Feng, Lingpeng Kong, Qi Liu
0
0
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) excel across diverse tasks involving concrete images from natural scenes. However, their ability to interpret abstract figures, such as geometry shapes and scientific plots, remains limited due to a scarcity of training datasets in scientific domains. To fill this gap, we introduce Multimodal ArXiv, consisting of ArXivCap and ArXivQA, for enhancing LVLMs scientific comprehension. ArXivCap is a figure-caption dataset comprising 6.4M images and 3.9M captions, sourced from 572K ArXiv papers spanning various scientific domains. Drawing from ArXivCap, we introduce ArXivQA, a question-answering dataset generated by prompting GPT-4V based on scientific figures. ArXivQA greatly enhances open-sourced LVLMs' mathematical reasoning capabilities, achieving a 10.4% absolute accuracy gain on a multimodal mathematical reasoning benchmark. Furthermore, employing ArXivCap, we devise four vision-to-text tasks for benchmarking LVLMs. Evaluation results with state-of-the-art LVLMs underscore their struggle with the nuanced semantics of academic figures, while domain-specific training yields substantial performance gains. Our error analysis uncovers misinterpretations of visual context, recognition errors, and the production of overly simplified captions by current LVLMs, shedding light on future improvements.
6/4/2024
New!We-Math: Does Your Large Multimodal Model Achieve Human-like Mathematical Reasoning?
Runqi Qiao, Qiuna Tan, Guanting Dong, Minhui Wu, Chong Sun, Xiaoshuai Song, Zhuoma GongQue, Shanglin Lei, Zhe Wei, Miaoxuan Zhang, Runfeng Qiao, Yifan Zhang, Xiao Zong, Yida Xu, Muxi Diao, Zhimin Bao, Chen Li, Honggang Zhang
0
0
Visual mathematical reasoning, as a fundamental visual reasoning ability, has received widespread attention from the Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) community. Existing benchmarks, such as MathVista and MathVerse, focus more on the result-oriented performance but neglect the underlying principles in knowledge acquisition and generalization. Inspired by human-like mathematical reasoning, we introduce WE-MATH, the first benchmark specifically designed to explore the problem-solving principles beyond end-to-end performance. We meticulously collect and categorize 6.5K visual math problems, spanning 67 hierarchical knowledge concepts and five layers of knowledge granularity. We decompose composite problems into sub-problems according to the required knowledge concepts and introduce a novel four-dimensional metric, namely Insufficient Knowledge (IK), Inadequate Generalization (IG), Complete Mastery (CM), and Rote Memorization (RM), to hierarchically assess inherent issues in LMMs' reasoning process. With WE-MATH, we conduct a thorough evaluation of existing LMMs in visual mathematical reasoning and reveal a negative correlation between solving steps and problem-specific performance. We confirm the IK issue of LMMs can be effectively improved via knowledge augmentation strategies. More notably, the primary challenge of GPT-4o has significantly transitioned from IK to IG, establishing it as the first LMM advancing towards the knowledge generalization stage. In contrast, other LMMs exhibit a marked inclination towards Rote Memorization - they correctly solve composite problems involving multiple knowledge concepts yet fail to answer sub-problems. We anticipate that WE-MATH will open new pathways for advancements in visual mathematical reasoning for LMMs. The WE-MATH data and evaluation code are available at https://github.com/We-Math/We-Math.
7/2/2024
💬
MuMath-Code: Combining Tool-Use Large Language Models with Multi-perspective Data Augmentation for Mathematical Reasoning
Shuo Yin, Weihao You, Zhilong Ji, Guoqiang Zhong, Jinfeng Bai
0
0
The tool-use Large Language Models (LLMs) that integrate with external Python interpreters have significantly enhanced mathematical reasoning capabilities for open-source LLMs, while tool-free methods chose another track: augmenting math reasoning data. However, a great method to integrate the above two research paths and combine their advantages remains to be explored. In this work, we firstly include new math questions via multi-perspective data augmenting methods and then synthesize code-nested solutions to them. The open LLMs (i.e., Llama-2) are finetuned on the augmented dataset to get the resulting models, MuMath-Code ($mu$-Math-Code). During the inference phase, our MuMath-Code generates code and interacts with the external python interpreter to get the execution results. Therefore, MuMath-Code leverages the advantages of both the external tool and data augmentation. To fully leverage the advantages of our augmented data, we propose a two-stage training strategy: In Stage-1, we finetune Llama-2 on pure CoT data to get an intermediate model, which then is trained on the code-nested data in Stage-2 to get the resulting MuMath-Code. Our MuMath-Code-7B achieves 83.8 on GSM8K and 52.4 on MATH, while MuMath-Code-70B model achieves new state-of-the-art performance among open methods -- achieving 90.7% on GSM8K and 55.1% on MATH. Extensive experiments validate the combination of tool use and data augmentation, as well as our two-stage training strategy. We release the proposed dataset along with the associated code for public use.
5/14/2024