MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper introduces MathVerse, a new benchmark for evaluating multi-modal language models on visual math problems.
- MathVerse tests how well these models can understand and reason about diagrams and equations in math questions.
- The paper analyzes the performance of several leading multi-modal models on the MathVerse benchmark.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how well multi-modal language models, which can process both text and images, can handle math problems that involve visual elements like diagrams and equations. The researchers created a new benchmark called MathVerse that tests the model's ability to understand and reason about these visual math problems.
The key idea is that while many language models are good at text-based math problems, they may struggle when the problems also involve visual components. The MathVerse benchmark allows the researchers to specifically test this "visual math" capability. They evaluated several state-of-the-art multi-modal models on the MathVerse tasks and found that there is still room for improvement in this area.
By creating this new benchmark, the researchers hope to spur further progress in developing multi-modal models that can truly "see" and comprehend the diagrams and equations present in complex math problems, not just process the textual descriptions. This could have important implications for building AI systems that can assist humans with math and problem-solving in a more natural, multi-modal way.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new benchmark called MathVerse for evaluating multi-modal language models on visual math problems. MathVerse consists of a dataset of math questions that require reasoning about both textual information and visual elements like diagrams and equations.
The authors evaluate the performance of several state-of-the-art multi-modal models, including ViLT, VinVL, and BLIP, on the MathVerse tasks. They find that while these models perform well on text-based math problems, their performance drops significantly when the problems involve visual components.
The paper provides a detailed analysis of the models' strengths and weaknesses. For example, the models often struggle to understand the semantic relationships between the visual elements and the textual descriptions. They also have difficulty accurately extracting and combining the relevant information from both modalities to arrive at the correct answer.
Overall, the results suggest that current multi-modal language models, despite their impressive capabilities, still have room for improvement when it comes to truly "seeing" and comprehending the visual elements present in complex math problems. The authors hope that the MathVerse benchmark will serve as a useful tool for driving further progress in this area.
Critical Analysis
The MathVerse benchmark provides a valuable contribution to the field by highlighting an important limitation of current multi-modal language models. While these models have shown impressive performance on a range of multimodal tasks, the paper demonstrates that they still struggle with the specific challenge of visual math problems.
One potential limitation of the study is the relatively small size of the MathVerse dataset, which may limit the ability to draw robust conclusions. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that expanding the dataset could be a fruitful direction for future work.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the reasons why the models struggle with visual math problems. Further research could explore the specific cognitive and architectural limitations that lead to these performance issues, which could in turn inform the development of more capable multi-modal models.
Despite these minor caveats, the MathVerse benchmark represents an important step forward in evaluating the true multimodal capabilities of language models. By highlighting this unmet challenge, the paper encourages the AI research community to continue pushing the boundaries of what these models can achieve.
Conclusion
The paper introduces the MathVerse benchmark, a new tool for evaluating the multimodal capabilities of language models on visual math problems. The results show that while current state-of-the-art models perform well on text-based math tasks, they still struggle to fully comprehend the visual elements present in complex math problems.
This finding has important implications for the development of AI systems that can assist humans with math and problem-solving in a more natural, multimodal way. By exposing this limitation, the MathVerse benchmark serves as a valuable resource for driving further progress in the field of multimodal language understanding.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?
Renrui Zhang, Dongzhi Jiang, Yichi Zhang, Haokun Lin, Ziyu Guo, Pengshuo Qiu, Aojun Zhou, Pan Lu, Kai-Wei Chang, Peng Gao, Hongsheng Li
The remarkable progress of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has garnered unparalleled attention, due to their superior performance in visual contexts. However, their capabilities in visual math problem-solving remain insufficiently evaluated and understood. We investigate current benchmarks to incorporate excessive visual content within textual questions, which potentially assist MLLMs in deducing answers without truly interpreting the input diagrams. To this end, we introduce MathVerse, an all-around visual math benchmark designed for an equitable and in-depth evaluation of MLLMs. We meticulously collect 2,612 high-quality, multi-subject math problems with diagrams from publicly available sources. Each problem is then transformed by human annotators into six distinct versions, each offering varying degrees of information content in multi-modality, contributing to 15K test samples in total. This approach allows MathVerse to comprehensively assess whether and how much MLLMs can truly understand the visual diagrams for mathematical reasoning. In addition, we propose a Chain-of-Thought (CoT) evaluation strategy for a fine-grained assessment of the output answers. Rather than naively judging True or False, we employ GPT-4(V) to adaptively extract crucial reasoning steps, and then score each step with detailed error analysis, which can reveal the intermediate CoT reasoning quality by MLLMs. We hope the MathVerse benchmark may provide unique insights to guide the future development of MLLMs. Project page: https://mathverse-cuhk.github.io
Read more8/20/2024
0
MultiMath: Bridging Visual and Mathematical Reasoning for Large Language Models
Shuai Peng, Di Fu, Liangcai Gao, Xiuqin Zhong, Hongguang Fu, Zhi Tang
The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has spurred extensive research into their domain-specific capabilities, particularly mathematical reasoning. However, most open-source LLMs focus solely on mathematical reasoning, neglecting the integration with visual injection, despite the fact that many mathematical tasks rely on visual inputs such as geometric diagrams, charts, and function plots. To fill this gap, we introduce textbf{MultiMath-7B}, a multimodal large language model that bridges the gap between math and vision. textbf{MultiMath-7B} is trained through a four-stage process, focusing on vision-language alignment, visual and math instruction-tuning, and process-supervised reinforcement learning. We also construct a novel, diverse and comprehensive multimodal mathematical dataset, textbf{MultiMath-300K}, which spans K-12 levels with image captions and step-wise solutions. MultiMath-7B achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance among open-source models on existing multimodal mathematical benchmarks and also excels on text-only mathematical benchmarks. Our model and dataset are available at {textcolor{blue}{url{https://github.com/pengshuai-rin/MultiMath}}}.
Read more9/4/2024
0
MathScape: Evaluating MLLMs in multimodal Math Scenarios through a Hierarchical Benchmark
Minxuan Zhou, Hao Liang, Tianpeng Li, Zhiyu Wu, Mingan Lin, Linzhuang Sun, Yaqi Zhou, Yan Zhang, Xiaoqin Huang, Yicong Chen, Yujing Qiao, Weipeng Chen, Bin Cui, Wentao Zhang, Zenan Zhou
With the development of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), the evaluation of multimodal models in the context of mathematical problems has become a valuable research field. Multimodal visual-textual mathematical reasoning serves as a critical indicator for evaluating the comprehension and complex multi-step quantitative reasoning abilities of MLLMs. However, previous multimodal math benchmarks have not sufficiently integrated visual and textual information. To address this gap, we proposed MathScape, a new benchmark that emphasizes the understanding and application of combined visual and textual information. MathScape is designed to evaluate photo-based math problem scenarios, assessing the theoretical understanding and application ability of MLLMs through a categorical hierarchical approach. We conduct a multi-dimensional evaluation on 11 advanced MLLMs, revealing that our benchmark is challenging even for the most sophisticated models. By analyzing the evaluation results, we identify the limitations of MLLMs, offering valuable insights for enhancing model performance.
Read more8/26/2024
🛸
0
VisionGraph: Leveraging Large Multimodal Models for Graph Theory Problems in Visual Context
Yunxin Li, Baotian Hu, Haoyuan Shi, Wei Wang, Longyue Wang, Min Zhang
Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have achieved impressive success in visual understanding and reasoning, remarkably improving the performance of mathematical reasoning in a visual context. Yet, a challenging type of visual math lies in the multimodal graph theory problem, which demands that LMMs understand the graphical structures accurately and perform multi-step reasoning on the visual graph. Additionally, exploring multimodal graph theory problems will lead to more effective strategies in fields like biology, transportation, and robotics planning. To step forward in this direction, we are the first to design a benchmark named VisionGraph, used to explore the capabilities of advanced LMMs in solving multimodal graph theory problems. It encompasses eight complex graph problem tasks, from connectivity to shortest path problems. Subsequently, we present a Description-Program-Reasoning (DPR) chain to enhance the logical accuracy of reasoning processes through graphical structure description generation and algorithm-aware multi-step reasoning. Our extensive study shows that 1) GPT-4V outperforms Gemini Pro in multi-step graph reasoning; 2) All LMMs exhibit inferior perception accuracy for graphical structures, whether in zero/few-shot settings or with supervised fine-tuning (SFT), which further affects problem-solving performance; 3) DPR significantly improves the multi-step graph reasoning capabilities of LMMs and the GPT-4V (DPR) agent achieves SOTA performance.
Read more5/9/2024