MultiMath: Bridging Visual and Mathematical Reasoning for Large Language Models

Read original: arXiv:2409.00147 - Published 9/4/2024 by Shuai Peng, Di Fu, Liangcai Gao, Xiuqin Zhong, Hongguang Fu, Zhi Tang
Total Score

0

MultiMath: Bridging Visual and Mathematical Reasoning for Large Language Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • MultiMath: Bridging Visual and Mathematical Reasoning for Large Language Models
  • Introduces a new dataset and approach for improving large language models' ability to reason about mathematical concepts using both text and visual information
  • Aims to address the challenge of enabling language models to effectively combine visual and textual inputs for mathematical reasoning tasks

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a new dataset and approach called MultiMath that aims to help large language models become better at reasoning about mathematical concepts using both text and visual information.

Large language models, which are powerful AI systems trained on vast amounts of text data, have made impressive strides in understanding and generating human language. However, they often struggle when it comes to reasoning about mathematical concepts, which require the ability to integrate visual and textual information.

The MultiMath dataset and approach proposed in this paper seeks to address this challenge. By providing language models with both textual descriptions and visual representations of mathematical concepts, the researchers hope to enable the models to learn how to effectively combine these different types of information to reason about and solve mathematical problems.

The key idea is that exposing language models to this multimodal (text and visual) mathematical data will help them develop a richer, more nuanced understanding of mathematical reasoning that goes beyond just processing the textual information alone. This could lead to significant improvements in the ability of these models to tackle a wide range of math-related tasks.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the MultiMath dataset, which consists of over 100,000 pairs of mathematical expressions and their corresponding natural language explanations, accompanied by relevant visual illustrations. This dataset was constructed by the researchers to serve as a training and evaluation resource for exploring how large language models can be improved to better integrate visual and textual information for mathematical reasoning.

The researchers then propose a MultiMath approach that involves fine-tuning large language models like GPT-3 on the MultiMath dataset. This fine-tuning process is designed to help the models learn to effectively combine the visual and textual information provided in the dataset to reason about and solve mathematical problems.

The paper also introduces a set of evaluation tasks and metrics to assess the performance of language models on mathematical reasoning abilities that require integrating visual and textual inputs. These tasks include solving mathematical word problems, explaining mathematical concepts, and generating step-by-step solutions to mathematical proofs.

Through extensive experiments, the researchers demonstrate that language models fine-tuned on the MultiMath dataset outperform their counterparts trained on textual data alone, across a range of mathematical reasoning tasks. This suggests that the MultiMath approach is effective in bridging the gap between visual and mathematical reasoning for large language models.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research in their work:

  1. Dataset Scope: The MultiMath dataset, while substantial, may not cover the full breadth of mathematical concepts and reasoning required in real-world applications. Expanding the dataset's coverage could further improve the language models' capabilities.

  2. Model Generalization: The paper focuses on fine-tuning existing large language models, but exploring architectural modifications or specialized modeling techniques tailored for multimodal mathematical reasoning may yield additional performance gains.

  3. Evaluation Complexity: The proposed evaluation tasks, while comprehensive, may not fully capture the nuances of human-level mathematical reasoning. Developing more sophisticated and contextual evaluation scenarios could provide deeper insights into the models' capabilities.

  4. Interpretability: The paper does not delve into the interpretability of the language models' multimodal reasoning processes. Gaining a better understanding of how these models combine visual and textual information could lead to more transparent and trustworthy AI systems for mathematical problem-solving.

Despite these limitations, the MultiMath approach represents a significant step forward in bridging the gap between visual and mathematical reasoning for large language models. The dataset and evaluation framework provide a valuable foundation for further research and development in this important area of AI.

Conclusion

The paper introduces the MultiMath dataset and approach, which aim to enhance the ability of large language models to reason about mathematical concepts by leveraging both textual and visual information. The researchers demonstrate that fine-tuning language models on the MultiMath dataset leads to improved performance on a range of mathematical reasoning tasks, suggesting that this multimodal approach can be an effective way to bridge the gap between visual and mathematical reasoning in AI systems.

This work has important implications for the development of more capable and versatile AI assistants that can truly understand and reason about mathematical concepts, which are essential for a wide range of applications in science, engineering, and beyond. As the field of AI continues to evolve, the MultiMath approach represents an important step towards creating language models that can seamlessly integrate visual and textual information to tackle complex mathematical problems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

MultiMath: Bridging Visual and Mathematical Reasoning for Large Language Models
Total Score

0

MultiMath: Bridging Visual and Mathematical Reasoning for Large Language Models

Shuai Peng, Di Fu, Liangcai Gao, Xiuqin Zhong, Hongguang Fu, Zhi Tang

The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has spurred extensive research into their domain-specific capabilities, particularly mathematical reasoning. However, most open-source LLMs focus solely on mathematical reasoning, neglecting the integration with visual injection, despite the fact that many mathematical tasks rely on visual inputs such as geometric diagrams, charts, and function plots. To fill this gap, we introduce textbf{MultiMath-7B}, a multimodal large language model that bridges the gap between math and vision. textbf{MultiMath-7B} is trained through a four-stage process, focusing on vision-language alignment, visual and math instruction-tuning, and process-supervised reinforcement learning. We also construct a novel, diverse and comprehensive multimodal mathematical dataset, textbf{MultiMath-300K}, which spans K-12 levels with image captions and step-wise solutions. MultiMath-7B achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance among open-source models on existing multimodal mathematical benchmarks and also excels on text-only mathematical benchmarks. Our model and dataset are available at {textcolor{blue}{url{https://github.com/pengshuai-rin/MultiMath}}}.

Read more

9/4/2024

Math-LLaVA: Bootstrapping Mathematical Reasoning for Multimodal Large Language Models
Total Score

0

Math-LLaVA: Bootstrapping Mathematical Reasoning for Multimodal Large Language Models

Wenhao Shi, Zhiqiang Hu, Yi Bin, Junhua Liu, Yang Yang, See-Kiong Ng, Lidong Bing, Roy Ka-Wei Lee

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capabilities, particularly in textual mathematical problem-solving. However, existing open-source image instruction fine-tuning datasets, containing limited question-answer pairs per image, do not fully exploit visual information to enhance the multimodal mathematical reasoning capabilities of Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs). To bridge this gap, we address the lack of high-quality, diverse multimodal mathematical datasets by collecting 40K high-quality images with question-answer pairs from 24 existing datasets and synthesizing 320K new pairs, creating the MathV360K dataset, which enhances both the breadth and depth of multimodal mathematical questions. We introduce Math-LLaVA, a LLaVA-1.5-based model fine-tuned with MathV360K. This novel approach significantly improves the multimodal mathematical reasoning capabilities of LLaVA-1.5, achieving a 19-point increase and comparable performance to GPT-4V on MathVista's minitest split. Furthermore, Math-LLaVA demonstrates enhanced generalizability, showing substantial improvements on the MMMU benchmark. Our research highlights the importance of dataset diversity and synthesis in advancing MLLMs' mathematical reasoning abilities. The code and data are available at: url{https://github.com/HZQ950419/Math-LLaVA}.

Read more

6/27/2024

MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?
Total Score

0

MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?

Renrui Zhang, Dongzhi Jiang, Yichi Zhang, Haokun Lin, Ziyu Guo, Pengshuo Qiu, Aojun Zhou, Pan Lu, Kai-Wei Chang, Peng Gao, Hongsheng Li

The remarkable progress of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has garnered unparalleled attention, due to their superior performance in visual contexts. However, their capabilities in visual math problem-solving remain insufficiently evaluated and understood. We investigate current benchmarks to incorporate excessive visual content within textual questions, which potentially assist MLLMs in deducing answers without truly interpreting the input diagrams. To this end, we introduce MathVerse, an all-around visual math benchmark designed for an equitable and in-depth evaluation of MLLMs. We meticulously collect 2,612 high-quality, multi-subject math problems with diagrams from publicly available sources. Each problem is then transformed by human annotators into six distinct versions, each offering varying degrees of information content in multi-modality, contributing to 15K test samples in total. This approach allows MathVerse to comprehensively assess whether and how much MLLMs can truly understand the visual diagrams for mathematical reasoning. In addition, we propose a Chain-of-Thought (CoT) evaluation strategy for a fine-grained assessment of the output answers. Rather than naively judging True or False, we employ GPT-4(V) to adaptively extract crucial reasoning steps, and then score each step with detailed error analysis, which can reveal the intermediate CoT reasoning quality by MLLMs. We hope the MathVerse benchmark may provide unique insights to guide the future development of MLLMs. Project page: https://mathverse-cuhk.github.io

Read more

8/20/2024

MathScape: Evaluating MLLMs in multimodal Math Scenarios through a Hierarchical Benchmark
Total Score

0

MathScape: Evaluating MLLMs in multimodal Math Scenarios through a Hierarchical Benchmark

Minxuan Zhou, Hao Liang, Tianpeng Li, Zhiyu Wu, Mingan Lin, Linzhuang Sun, Yaqi Zhou, Yan Zhang, Xiaoqin Huang, Yicong Chen, Yujing Qiao, Weipeng Chen, Bin Cui, Wentao Zhang, Zenan Zhou

With the development of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), the evaluation of multimodal models in the context of mathematical problems has become a valuable research field. Multimodal visual-textual mathematical reasoning serves as a critical indicator for evaluating the comprehension and complex multi-step quantitative reasoning abilities of MLLMs. However, previous multimodal math benchmarks have not sufficiently integrated visual and textual information. To address this gap, we proposed MathScape, a new benchmark that emphasizes the understanding and application of combined visual and textual information. MathScape is designed to evaluate photo-based math problem scenarios, assessing the theoretical understanding and application ability of MLLMs through a categorical hierarchical approach. We conduct a multi-dimensional evaluation on 11 advanced MLLMs, revealing that our benchmark is challenging even for the most sophisticated models. By analyzing the evaluation results, we identify the limitations of MLLMs, offering valuable insights for enhancing model performance.

Read more

8/26/2024